Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 73 days, net +11,897. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,415–43,882 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 12:17
42,097
+60
27 Oct 2026, 09:06
42,037
+116
26 Oct 2026, 05:56
41,921
+183
25 Oct 2026, 04:16
41,738
+97
24 Oct 2026, 05:46
41,641
+152
23 Oct 2026, 02:07
41,489
+390
21 Oct 2026, 22:40
41,099
+41
20 Oct 2026, 18:20
41,058
+155
19 Oct 2026, 19:07
40,903
+113
18 Oct 2026, 20:18
40,790
+195
17 Oct 2026, 19:01
40,595
+171
16 Oct 2026, 19:08
40,424
+181
15 Oct 2026, 15:38
40,243
+285
14 Oct 2026, 14:51
39,958
+435
13 Oct 2026, 06:28
39,523
+1,009
9 Oct 2026, 03:16
38,514
+1,447
4 Oct 2026, 14:57
37,067
+4,803
26 Sept 2026, 06:41
32,264
+535
19 Sept 2026, 10:19
31,729
+63
16 Sept 2026, 20:15
31,666
first reading
Engagement
141 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.0%
avg views ÷ 42,097 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.161%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
141 (12 August 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
610,970
Reactions total
932
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Oct 2026, 03:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
775
Videos
15
Links
445
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,690 reactions across 132 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,452
85.9%
👍
39
2.31%
👎
39
2.31%
🔥
31
1.83%
🥰
29
1.72%
🤬
27
1.60%
🙏
13
0.769%
👏
10
0.592%
🫡
8
0.473%
🤝
7
0.414%
😭
6
0.355%
💔
4
0.237%
🤗
4
0.237%
😁
3
0.178%
🤡
3
0.178%
❤🔥
2
0.118%
🍌
2
0.118%
💋
2
0.118%
💘
2
0.118%
😘
2
0.118%
5 further kinds
5
0.296%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 141 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.709%
1 of 141 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,320
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,910
over 139 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
WI0dS5BZy5ta3Y
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 141 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
prompt
Create an ultra-realistic vertical 9:16 iPhone photograph matching the reference exactly. A young man stands in the left foreground, framed from the head to below the knees, his body facing slightly right and his head turned toward a bright fountain firework on his right. His face is almost completely silhouetted, with only a faint warm rim light outlining his nose, lips, and jaw. He has thick, dark, volumin…
Create an ultra-photorealistic cinematic editorial photograph in a MANDATORY 3:4 vertical portrait aspect ratio for Instagram. Use the uploaded person as the subject, preserving their identity, facial features, skin tone, age, and hairstyle. Show them seated sideways on a simple black metal folding chair, reclining backward with their head tilted up toward a large, horizontally oriented, brilliantly illuminated recta…
Use the uploaded reference image as the ONLY reference for the complete composition, exact pose, body positioning, outfits, hairstyles, facial expressions, camera angle, framing, background, lighting, colors, and overall mood. Create an ultra-realistic vertical 9:16 romantic couple photograph that recreates the reference image as closely as possible, with a natural smartphone-camera look. POSE & COMPOSITION: A young …
Showing the 12 most recent of 141 posts we hold for @editzboysukdeb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Editz Boy @vseditz33 · 23,651 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 15 September 2026
Sopan Tech 🤖 @sopan_tech · 128,859 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
David editor @david_editor · 152,847 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Editz Boy Sukdeb” (@editzboysukdeb), 42,097 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editzboysukdeb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.