Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ediz’s Trap House

Channel

Ediz’s Trap House

@edizmode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002684835297
TypeChannel
Username@edizmode
Created14 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edizmode

Growth

1871991939 August 2026 — 199 subscribers9 August 2026 — 199 subscribers16 August 2026 — 196 subscribers23 August 2026 — 194 subscribers30 August 2026 — 192 subscribers8 September 2026 — 187 subscribers16 September 2026 — 190 subscribers1909 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:56190+3
8 Sept 2026, 19:36187-5
30 Aug 2026, 20:08192-2
23 Aug 2026, 15:17194-2
16 Aug 2026, 05:28196-3
9 Aug 2026, 06:41199no change
9 Aug 2026, 01:46199first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2846.7%
👍1220.0%
💯915.0%
813.3%
🍾35.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Never PvP your friends for EL. Work together, stay persistent on your thesis, and win as a team. LOCK IN OR CLOCK IN DUUUUDES https://x.com/EdizEffect/status/2084766075594633673

🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

When I go in on a coin and shill once I will bag work it till minimum 5x so all the homies eat

🍾2

4 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC131 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

2x since the dip earlier. Getting ready for a new ATH potentially?

🍾1

4 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC219 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Last time I'm going to be shilling "dude" here. Still a viral meme that is organically hitting the timeline. More viral potential than NEEGY and comparable to NEEGY. Easily worth more than whats currently at, but we'll see how the market takes it. Still bullish here and expecting a reversal. Send it DUUUUUUDES

🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC134 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

DUDE pulled a 2x overnight and dumped back down to entry. I still think the meme itself is undervalued considering all the traction its getting on Instagram/Tik Tok. Still confident we see this go higher than just 70k, so this could be a potential entry at 35k again. DYOR DUUUUUDES https://dexscreener.com/solana/3zQAQGVrQMeKsjYsMGKsz3rVFqyviuA9MXKikt9vUi5o

4 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Anyone got a dex credit and wants to run up $DUDE with me?

🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC138 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Pretty sure "DUUUUDE" can pull a NEEGY in regard to viral meme potential. I've been seeing tons of these memes pop up on my timeline and they're getting tons of views. Also I find the meme pretty funny (funnier than neegy) Looks undervalued here at 35k (DYOR) F2SD9jTbiAWyZ9Ss7kvFCr95o4TdfjsHSQRGSJ4Xpump

💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @edizmode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ediz’s Trap House” (@edizmode), 190 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edizmode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.