Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Об ИСЦЕЛЕНИИ, ЗДОРОВЬЕ и ДЕНЬГАХ

Channel

Об ИСЦЕЛЕНИИ, ЗДОРОВЬЕ и ДЕНЬГАХ

@eduardgulyaev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,167subscribers

-239 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001869629656
TypeChannel
Username@eduardgulyaev
DescriptionОфициальный канал Эдуарда Гуляева в Telegram 💬 Чат с отзывами https://t.me/otzyvGuliaev ❓ Задать вопрос Эдуарду Гуляеву https://edgul.com/ask 📹 YouTube https://youtube.com/@eduard_gulyaev?si=c0Rs5bFfP 📺 Rutube https://rutube.ru/u/EduardGulyaev
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eduardgulyaev

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,16710,40610,286.57 August 2026 — 10,406 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,405 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,406 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,394 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,385 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,368 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,358 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,357 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,349 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,347 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,351 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,346 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,345 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,340 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,345 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,347 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,340 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,338 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,341 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,339 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,330 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,323 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,318 subscribers27 September 2026 — 10,285 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,258 subscribers9 October 2026 — 10,250 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,229 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,226 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,220 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,212 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,205 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,206 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,201 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,202 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,194 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,196 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,194 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,193 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,192 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,202 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,205 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,207 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,203 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,201 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,196 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,193 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,184 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,176 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,171 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,167 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -239. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,131–10,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 18:1910,167-4
4 Nov 2026, 19:1110,171-5
3 Nov 2026, 16:4610,176-8
2 Nov 2026, 13:5610,184-9
1 Nov 2026, 16:1910,193-3
31 Oct 2026, 14:1710,196-5
30 Oct 2026, 16:0010,201-2
29 Oct 2026, 18:0010,203-4
28 Oct 2026, 19:5810,207+2
27 Oct 2026, 20:5910,205+3
26 Oct 2026, 21:4010,202+10
25 Oct 2026, 21:5010,192-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:4610,193-1
23 Oct 2026, 18:5510,194-2
22 Oct 2026, 18:1010,196+2
21 Oct 2026, 16:5010,194-8
20 Oct 2026, 12:1510,202+1
19 Oct 2026, 12:5110,201-5
18 Oct 2026, 14:3710,206+1
17 Oct 2026, 15:5710,205first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.24%
avg views ÷ 10,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
431
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held85 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,186
Reactions total225
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,160
Videos
≈944
Links
≈1,970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
55m 32s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,120 reactions across 85 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤80571.9%
👍998.84%
🔥908.04%
🙏514.55%
❤‍🔥201.79%
👏201.79%
🎉121.07%
💯80.714%
🕊60.536%
🥰40.357%
✍30.268%
⚡10.089%
😍10.089%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 85 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eduardgulyaev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC245 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📣 Друзья, уже завтра приглашаем вас на прямой эфир «Что мешает богатству?» 🔸 6 ноября, пятница 🔸 13:00 🔸 Ведёт Юлия Широкова Деньги влияют практически на все сферы нашей жизни: отношения, семью, возможности и окружение. Но почему одним удаётся прийти к достатку, а другие снова и снова сталкиваются с финансовыми трудностями? Обсудим: • деньги и отношения в паре; • финансовые отношения родителей и взрослых детей; • …

❤5

5 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC251 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🧘‍♀️ Как женщина влияет на доходы мужа? Есть такое сравнение: мужчина — это единица, а женщина — ноль. И это совершенно не означает, что женщина хуже или менее значима. Но если после единицы поставить ноль, получится уже 10. То есть женщина, находясь рядом с мужчиной, может многократно усилить его возможности — в том числе и финансовые. Когда женщина верит в мужа, поддерживает его, вдохновляет, помогает двигаться в…

❤9

5 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC288 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

💮 Когда негатив затрагивает сразу три сферы жизни Бывает, человек говорит: «У меня ничего не складывается». Денег постоянно не хватает, с работой проблемы, в личной жизни тоже всё идёт не так. Меняется одно обстоятельство, затем другое, но общий сценарий остаётся прежним. В таких случаях причиной может быть не одно отдельное нарушение. Иногда при диагностике обнаруживается негативная информация сразу в трёх важных …

❤6🔥5

4 Nov 2026, 10:12 UTC359 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🎯 Одна из причин финансовых неудач Человек работает, старается, экономит, ищет новые возможности, но деньги словно обходят его стороной. Только удалось немного накопить — появляются непредвиденные расходы. Только наметился рост дохода — возникает новое препятствие. И так может продолжаться годами. Когда речь идёт о финансовом неблагополучии, одной из причин может быть так называемая «программа на бедность». Это опр…

❤5

3 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC408 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

⚠️ Чем опасна экономия на себе? «Главное — детям всё дать. А я как-нибудь обойдусь». Очень многие женщины живут именно так: всё лучшее — детям, а собственные желания, развитие и комфорт постоянно откладываются на потом. Новое платье может подождать, обучение кажется слишком дорогим, отдых — необязательным, а уход за собой — тем, без чего вполне можно обойтись. И незаметно это «потом» растягивается на годы, а женщин…

❤13

3 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC365 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

📌 Как убрать денежные установки? «Большие деньги достаются только тяжёлым трудом», «Чтобы много зарабатывать, нужны связи», «Деньги портят людей», «Мне никогда не стать обеспеченным»… Иногда человек даже не замечает, сколько подобных установок находится в его сознании и подсознании. Часть из них формируется ещё в детстве: мы слышим разговоры родителей, наблюдаем за отношением семьи к деньгам, перенимаем взгляды окр…

❤2

3 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC376 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

💰 Что влияет на денежную ёмкость? Для одного человека определённая зарплата — это хорошие деньги: «Мне хватает, я прекрасно зарабатываю». А другой при абсолютно таком же доходе скажет: «Я получаю копейки». Почему? Потому что у каждого своё понимание достатка, свои потребности, цели и программа жизни. У каждого существует определённая внутренняя планка: какая сумма для меня нормальна, сколько я достоин получать, как…

❤5

2 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC414 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🤲 На эти цели деньги даются легче Задумывались ли вы, для чего именно вам нужны большие деньги? Просто иметь больше или реализовать с их помощью что-то действительно важное? Когда человек ставит перед собой благородную цель, Космос может прийти ему на помощь. Например, деньги нужны, чтобы помочь близкому человеку, дать детям хорошее образование, обеспечить достойную жизнь своей семье, реализовать полезный проект ил…

❤16

2 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC461 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

⚡️Почему деньги обходят стороной, даже когда вы делаете всё правильно Бывает, что вы много работаете, стараетесь, пробуете новое, а денег всё равно не хватает. Только появились, и сразу ушли. Кажется, будто стоит невидимый потолок. Причина почти всегда есть. Это информация, которая не позволяет быть материально обеспеченным человеком. И иногда её корни уходят очень далеко. Например, в прошлую жизнь. Когда-то на че…

❤11

1 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC507 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🏆 Как больше зарабатывать? Первое, с чего стоит начать, — с понимания: «Я достоин того, чтобы у меня были деньги». Почему у другого человека может быть высокий доход, успешный бизнес и финансовая свобода, а у вас нет? Вы ничем не хуже. Когда мы видим человека, у которого великолепно идут финансовые дела, не нужно ему завидовать. Наоборот, порадуйтесь: значит, в наше время действительно есть возможность хорошо зараб…

❤8👍3

31 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC557 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Хорошее самочувствие каждый день — это не сказки Бывает, что дела идут нормально, но настроение совсем не соответствует. После сна нет бодрости, неохота что-то делать, голова болит слишком часто. Только бы сходить на работу и вечером скорее домой, отдыхать. Мы стараемся разобраться, найти какую-то новую информацию, раз по-старому не работает. Но правда в том, что жизнью управляет наша энергия — она определяет сос…

❤8🔥3👍1

30 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC509 views64 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🎁 Давайте сделаем подарок вместе! Друзья, сегодня у Эдуарда Александровича день рождения, ему исполнилось 86 лет! 💞 И нам хочется, чтобы одним из подарков стало общее «спасибо» от всех нас — учеников, друзей, читателей и тех, кому близки знания Академии. 📏📏📏📏📏📏📏📏 Если у вас есть Telegram Premium, пожалуйста, подарите свой голос каналу. Это бесплатно и займёт несколько секунд: ➡️ https://t.me/boost/eduardgulyaev …

❤36🎉12🔥7🕊5👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @eduardgulyaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@eduardgulyaev edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @eduardgulyaev as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
27 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инструментальная музыка
@zolotaya_kollekciy · 23,993
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026
RAFAEL FACEGURU
@rafael_faceguru · 27,837
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Об ИСЦЕЛЕНИИ, ЗДОРОВЬЕ и ДЕНЬГАХ” (@eduardgulyaev), 10,167 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eduardgulyaev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.