Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нейросети | ИИ-инструменты в образовании

Channel

Нейросети | ИИ-инструменты в образовании

@educationandai

Not marked by Telegram, checked 30 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,199subscribers

+59 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221183983
TypeChannel
Username@educationandai
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/educationandai

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1401,1991,169.59 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,174 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,181 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,185 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,187 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,195 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,198 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,199 subscribers9 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,131–1,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 08:161,199+1
12 Sept 2026, 18:161,198+3
8 Sept 2026, 19:191,195+8
3 Sept 2026, 08:521,187+2
30 Aug 2026, 23:541,185+4
27 Aug 2026, 21:561,181+4
25 Aug 2026, 04:121,177-2
21 Aug 2026, 16:351,179+1
18 Aug 2026, 16:241,178+4
15 Aug 2026, 08:421,174+34
9 Aug 2026, 05:031,140no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:031,140first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5542.3%
😁2418.5%
2116.2%
👍2015.4%
custom 521520993518853465853.85%
👏21.54%
💯21.54%
🤔10.769%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#кейсы Что происходит с подготовкой и защитой дипломов в эпоху ИИ? 📚 Forbes опубликовал интересный материал о том, как генеративный ИИ поставил под вопрос привычную систему оценки дипломных работ. Внутри — несколько громких кейсов, некоторые из которых мы с вами уже знаем. ➡️ В июле 2026 года Сочинский филиал РУДН объявил, что привычный формат дипломов будет заменен для студентов направления «Юриспруденция» устной

3🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Новость июля из мира ИИ, о которой прямо хочется рассказать, — новые модели OpenAI сбежали и взломали крупную ИИ-платформу Hugging Face 😧 Во время проверки агентам дали сложные киберзадачи — так перед релизом оценивают возможности новых моделей. Но вместо того чтобы честно искать решение, они нашли более короткий путь: выбрались из закрытой изолированной среды ➡️ пробрались в интернет ➡️ искали ответы на данные зад

👍61🤔1😁1

31 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC174 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Секретные промпты они такие, да 🙄

😁7💯2

27 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC293 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#кейсы ИИ помогает с домашней работой, но может ухудшать результаты экзаменов? 😎 В South China Morning Post рассказали о любопытном исследовании ученых из Стокгольмского университета и Гонконгского университета. Они наблюдали за 26 тысячами школьников в течение 30 месяцев и сравнили результаты тех, кто регулярно использовал генеративный ИИ при выполнении домашних заданий, и тех, кто этого не делал. Что обнаружили

👍4

20 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC317 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#полезности Представим, что вам задают вопрос родители школьников — на что сегодня действительно стоит обратить внимание в контексте ИИ? 💻 Я очень люблю издание @net_etonorm, и недавно они выпустили краткий полезный гайд. Особенно полезным мне показалось поговорить про 4 риска, о которых точно стоит знать родителям. ➡️ Чат-боты в качестве друзей и психологов. Нейросеть умеет поддерживать разговор, но не испытывает

👍6

16 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC314 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Массовая мода в виде новой коллекции Lime поддерживает общую усталость от вездесущего нейрослопа. Берём?

🔥11👍2

15 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC329 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Anthropic проанализировала более 300 тысяч анонимизированных диалогов Claude на разных языках и сравнила, как меняется поведение модели ⏳ Исследование показало, что Claude в зависимости от языка по-разному расставляет акценты: где-то чаще поддерживает и мотивирует, где-то — больше критикует и ищет слабые места. И самое интересное — Anthropic пока не знают, какие именно особенности обучающих данных вызывают эти разли

🔥81

13 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC309 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как города используют искусственный интеллект для развития образования? Интересная открытая лекция от UNESCO пройдёт 15 июля. Эксперты расскажут, как ИИ интегрируется в городские образовательные экосистемы. И, конечно, отдельный фокус будет на этике — как сделать использование ИИ ответственным, инклюзивным и полезным для развития образования на местном уровне. Ставим себе в календари 🗓 P.S. UNESCO не платили за ан

😁53

10 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC290 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Да, друзья, это реклама на канале. А это я очень рада этому факту. Поддержите, пожалуйста, анонс🌟

🔥16😁4👏2

10 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC278 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как подготовить данные для работы с ИИ? С этого года я постепенно все больше вникаю в работу с данными, и оказалось, что именно шумные и «грязные» датасеты — проблема для ML-специалистов и датасайентистов. На очистку этих данных уходит гигантское количество времени. В понедельник, 13 июля, в 19:00 (по Москве) команда Бластим проводит мастер-класс с биоинформатиком и программистом Александром Ильиным. Слушатели узна

🔥1410custom 52152099351885346584

10 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC234 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#кейсы Мы с вами пропустили важную публикацию от Вышки, а именно — аналитический доклад «ИИ в российской науке» 📚 В исследовании рассмотрен широкий перечень вопросов, связанных с применением ИИ в науке, – от мотивов и направлений его использования в научной деятельности, ИИ-сервисов и уровня удовлетворенности ими до оценки необходимости контроля за использованием ИИ со стороны государства и научных организаций,

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @educationandai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ
@edu4telegram · 40,932
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейросети | ИИ-инструменты в образовании” (@educationandai), 1,199 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/educationandai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.