Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кирка

Channel

Кирка

@edvard_rid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,748subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001468700569
TypeChannel
Username@edvard_rid
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edvard_rid

Growth

10,73910,77110,75518 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,771 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,767 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,739 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,750 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,743 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,747 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,762 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,758 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,751 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,755 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,748 subscribers10,74818 August 20263 September 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,734–10,776 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 18:0110,748-7
2 Sept 2026, 12:1510,755+4
1 Sept 2026, 11:5910,751-7
31 Aug 2026, 11:3810,758+3
30 Aug 2026, 14:4610,755+2
29 Aug 2026, 13:1910,753-9
28 Aug 2026, 15:5710,762+6
27 Aug 2026, 15:5810,756+5
26 Aug 2026, 12:5410,751+4
25 Aug 2026, 14:3910,747+4
24 Aug 2026, 12:5610,743-7
22 Aug 2026, 21:4410,750+11
21 Aug 2026, 12:3510,739-18
20 Aug 2026, 11:5210,757-10
19 Aug 2026, 10:3510,767-4
18 Aug 2026, 12:0010,771no change
18 Aug 2026, 11:4510,771first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 10,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,500
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held25 (17 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total42,000
Reactions total1,195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,545 reactions across 25 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,54560.7%
🤯28011.0%
🔥1455.70%
1274.99%
👍1254.91%
🤣833.26%
🥰692.71%
💋562.20%
💩401.57%
😱210.825%
🤔180.707%
😍100.393%
🗿90.354%
🥱60.236%
🤨50.196%
😘40.157%
🤗20.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,545 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 25 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @edvard_rid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,730 views69 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Итоги раздумий, как ускорить процесс копания Установил буровую установку на систему валов Теперь буровая установка благодаря ещё и лебёдке может перемещаться в выделенном квадрате по трём осям🤤

61👍6💋2

27 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈2,510 views102 reactions3 Starsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Я тут... уничтожаю свой мир🥵

72🤯19👍7💋2💩2

23 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈4,080 views81 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Ну хочу и тд

685👍3💋3💩2

21 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,960 views69 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔥А ролик то уже на канале! Бегом смотреть, ставить лайки, писать комментарии. А там есть что обсудить🤤 Ютуб: https://youtu.be/lgnV6LrnX50 Сборка: https://boosty.to/kkirka

🔥54💋6💩5🤣2🥱2

20 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈3,690 views105 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ролик смонтировал полностью. Оставлял пустые места под реплей. Тем временем реплей🫠

75🤣20🔥5💋4💩1

20 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈3,210 views80 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Так, ну... Контента на 2 часа 20 минут! Моё стандартное выживание, на моей сборке, должен успеть за сегодня смонтировать и завтра опубликовать😡

68🔥7💋4💩1

19 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈3,210 views142 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

На этой картине я впервые решил заняться фигурой человека🤤 Но так как рисовал в подарок, решил не рисковать и заранее сделать обводку контура через экран монитора. После накидал цветовые пятна, чтобы контур не потерялся, и уже далее стал вырабатывать детали. Под конец покрыл картину глянцевым лаком, при чём, если заметите, лак лёг немного узорно, из-за того, что впервые использовал силиконовый валик🫠

115🤯13🔥6👍4🥰4

18 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈3,150 views33 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔥 FreshCraft Fantasy v3.7 — глобальное обновление! 🔥 Вышла новая версия фэнтези‑сборки для Minecraft (1.20.1, Forge) — более 400 модов, глубокая проработка контента и крутая атмосфера! ✨Зная какие трудности сейчас испытывает сборка, ребята постарались на славу🧐 Поддержите проект и разработчиков своей активностью😘 🧙‍♂️ Что внутри: система классов и рас + древо прокачки до 30 уровня; магия, драконы, новые измерения, б

🔥24💩5💋4

16 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈3,540 views113 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

🔥Итого, 23 000 слов сценария, что растягивается на 2 часа 20 минут ролика, и всё для того, что рассказать как я проложил железную дорогу до 100 000 координаты💀

🤯91🥰114💋4🤔3

16 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈3,850 views32 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @saudade_studio

Posted without readable text

24🔥3💋2😱21

12 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈4,140 views191 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

🔥Я написал сценарий на час и двадцать минут. А это только одна третья отснятого материала, который я хочу уместить в один ролик.. Ролик кста по моей сборке, так что там будет интересно, не то что последнее время💀 Вы чё хотите ролик на три часа?😭

157🔥20😍10👍2💩2

8 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,930 views178 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня дорисовал очередную картину🥵 Моя вторая картина где так детально рисую человека, первую покажу позже, я забыл про неё🫠 Покупайте - 50 000 руб📈

11244😱14🤣5💩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @edvard_rid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ИВАНЧЕЛА
@ivanchelayt · 36,482
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Корова из майнкрафта / Бурёночек
@Burenochek · 45,290
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
ZeeMan Family
@zeemanofficial · 97,223
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кирка” (@edvard_rid), 10,748 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edvard_rid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.