Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Edward Slavsquat

Channel

Edward Slavsquat

@edwardslavsquat

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,942subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001578036210
TypeChannel
Username@edwardslavsquat
Created16 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edwardslavsquat

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9422,9882,9656 August 2026 — 2,988 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,988 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,987 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,975 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,974 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,970 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,965 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,962 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,958 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,953 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,947 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,946 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,942 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,935–2,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 13:412,942-4
8 Sept 2026, 22:202,946-1
3 Sept 2026, 15:372,947-6
31 Aug 2026, 18:442,953-5
28 Aug 2026, 15:262,958-4
25 Aug 2026, 07:132,962-3
22 Aug 2026, 12:542,965-5
18 Aug 2026, 20:552,970-4
15 Aug 2026, 13:552,974-1
12 Aug 2026, 06:422,975-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:012,980-7
6 Aug 2026, 18:102,987-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:032,988no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:432,988first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

700 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10314.7%
🤣669.43%
🔥557.86%
🤡537.57%
🤬527.43%
💯517.29%
😐507.14%
355.00%
😁284.00%
👎273.86%
🤨223.14%
💩182.57%
😢182.57%
😱172.43%
🥴162.29%
😈152.14%
🤮152.14%
👏142.00%
🤔121.71%
😭81.14%
10 further kinds253.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 700 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,510 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Germany provides Ukraine with drones that vaporize Russians each and every day. Actions have consequences! [source: ria.ru]

🥴15🤡8🤯7👍2🔥2😈2🎅1

15 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈5,760 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fuel ration cards issued via Russia's MAX messenger will be tested in Chita. [source: Kommersant]

💩18😐7👍6💯5🤬3👏1

23 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC≈3,580 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

War of attrition going great. https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/crimea-suspends-gasoline-sales

😐16😭8😁6👏2🤬1🆒1

7 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC≈7,820 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Sevastopol has introduced a gasoline-once-a-week-(maybe)-via-QR-code system. Not to be confused with NATO's "cheap Russian oil (and no QR code needed) via the Druzhba pipeline" system. It is good that we have left the uni-system world for getting gasoline, and now have multiple systems for getting gasoline. [source: ria.ru]

🤬18🤣14😐8🤡4🤔2🏆1👏1

5 Jun 2026, 03:28 UTC≈4,180 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Russian oil exports to NATO states continue, and are reportedly even "back to normal levels". Meanwhile, Crimea is suffering a fuel shortage because Ukrainian (NATO) drones are blockading the land corridor to the peninsula. Gasoline sales in Crimea are now "temporarily suspended". Take a moment and think about this. What could this mean? 🧐

🤨17🔥10🤡9😈3👍21🤔1🤣1

16 May 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,090 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Not the Goldman Sachs-coined acronym we need, but probably the Goldman Sachs-coined acronym we deserve. https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/brics-silent-on-us-israel-war-against

🔥15👍9🤨5🤬4💯2🥴1🙏1

12 May 2026, 11:59 UTC≈4,070 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I feel obliged to mention that Ritter’s 4-year grift-narrative about the Brilliant War of Attrition That Has Murdered Hundreds of Thousands of Ordinary Slavs For No Good Reason Whatsoever makes absolutely zero sense if Ritter is now acknowledging that the long-term threat posed by Ukraine’s rapidly developing military capabilities means Moscow might need to drop a tactical nuke on London if it wants to avoid “dying t

😱12👍11🔥7💯5👏21😁1

8 May 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,030 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/victory-day

😢114👍4👌1👏1🙈1

5 Apr 2026, 10:10 UTC≈8,280 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Over the past several weeks, the Russian government has made a series of decisions so thoroughly perplexing that some Russians now believe they are witnessing a conscious and deliberate effort to detonate their country from within. (Probably your own government is behaving similarly. See? We aren’t so different after all. Why can’t we all just get along?) https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/russian-government-judo

💯30👍108😱4🤔2🙏2😐1

31 Mar 2026, 08:29 UTC≈4,700 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We're back! Is everyone enjoying 2026? To increase enjoyment, read my conversation with the indispensable Iain Davis. https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/agitating-for-mind-revolution

🔥18👍108👎1😱1

8 Feb 2026, 18:03 UTC≈4,200 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Another lesson from the SMO! https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/no-water-for-donetsk-but-lots-of

👍11🤔5👏2

7 Feb 2026, 11:22 UTC≈3,990 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

After flooding Ukraine with weapons for nearly four years, the EU has finally been CHECKMATED by Moscow. (source: TASS)

🤣31😁9🤡8😈3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @edwardslavsquat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,566
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD)
@christineanderson · 35,564
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
REALCHRISSKY
@realchrissky · 32,404
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Simon
@goddek · 39,329
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Independent Medical Alliance
@IMA_Health · 31,741
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
Robin Monotti
@robinmg · 68,021
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
The Exposé News (Official)
@dailyexpose · 27,989
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Edward Slavsquat” (@edwardslavsquat), 2,942 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edwardslavsquat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.