Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Edwin Group

Channel

Edwin Group

@edwingroupchannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,638subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001268821563
TypeChannel
Username@edwingroupchannel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edwingroupchannel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6091,6381,623.57 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,616 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,609 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,614 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,619 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,626 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,632 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,631 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,632 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,633 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,631 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,638 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,605–1,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:011,638+7
14 Sept 2026, 05:201,631-2
10 Sept 2026, 08:161,633+1
5 Sept 2026, 09:561,632+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:141,631-1
29 Aug 2026, 11:191,632+6
26 Aug 2026, 09:091,626+7
23 Aug 2026, 04:351,619+4
20 Aug 2026, 02:221,615+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:261,614+5
10 Aug 2026, 22:341,609-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:021,616-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:161,617first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4447.8%
🔥2426.1%
👏88.70%
👍66.52%
🤩55.43%
custom 528294518151396464833.26%
custom 528288553730312281822.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2👍1custom 52828855373031228181

6 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥6❤1👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC201 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В 2026-м году любая переписка с бухгалтером сводится всегда к одному…

❤8

1 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC341 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чужое мнение Самое странное в чужом мнении — не то, что оно существует. А то, какое именно мнение мы выбираем слушать. Человек пишет: — Красавчик. Отлично получилось. Ты такой: — Да ладно. Через минуту приходит другой: — Херня какая-то. И вот тут начинается расследование. Я недавно видел человека, который раздавал советы по бизнесу. Зашёл к нему на страницу. Из достижений только фотография с карпом. И знаете что? …

❤8custom 52829451815139646483custom 52828855373031228181

28 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC333 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лет десять назад мы с командой пытались понять одну вещь. Почему в одних коллективах люди работают с интересом годами, а в других — даже сильные специалисты постепенно гаснут? Тогда наткнулись на исследование американского психолога Артура Арона. Он изучал, как между незнакомыми людьми возникает близость. Подготовил 36 вопросов — от простых к личным. Люди отвечали по очереди. Некоторые пары после эксперимента начинал…

🔥6

23 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC354 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сколько денег нужно для счастья? Недавно увидел исследование. Учёные выяснили, что для счастья человеку нужно около 200 тысяч рублей в месяц. После этой суммы уровень счастья почти перестаёт расти. Очень интересное исследование. Особенно для людей, которые уже зарабатывают 200 тысяч. ⸻ Вообще я заметил странную вещь. Планка счастья всегда находится чуть выше твоего дохода. Когда человек получает 50 тысяч, он…

👍2

21 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC345 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут с ребятами запускаем новое шоу. Хотели узнать ваше мнение. На какую тему актуальнее всего было бы поговорить? Пишите в комментариях 🫶

🔥5

19 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC364 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤8

17 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC431 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У каждого четвёртого начальника психическое расстройство. Честно говоря, звучит даже оптимистично. Потому что если посмотреть на некоторые рабочие чаты, кажется, что исследование проводили очень поверхностно. Вообще руководитель — это человек, который за день может сказать: — Нам нужно думать о стратегии компании на пять лет вперёд. И через три минуты: — Кто опять взял мой сырок из холодильника?! Поэтому меня …

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @edwingroupchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Edwin Group” (@edwingroupchannel), 1,638 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edwingroupchannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.