Channel
@effectisermon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
260subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001620082752 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @effectisermon |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/effectisermon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 260 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 261 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 262 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 260 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 260 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 November 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
⚠️ دورات مجانية لتعلم اللغة الإنجليزية بالإضافة لمسابقات كثيره على قناة الاستاذة.. رابطها👈 @EnglishLearning .... 🎉 @ALRiyadhcar توصيل الرياض 🎉 @aljabri720 القرآن الكريم. Q 🎉 @sbhiat صباح التوكل 🔆 〰 🎉 @jawharatdimont 💚💜❤️جواهر الوعي💜 🎉 @Naba_M_M لُْٱ تْٰيٰۛأسَٰ 🎉 @sbahit صباحيات 🌅 〰 🎉 @iaaaiz كـواري | Quari🪻🩶 🎉 @web_applications تطوير تطبيقات 💻 🎉 @bintzadalraqb ☘كلمة وكليمة 〰 🎉 @coffee710 ك…
Signed لستة الوان، نواشئ (9م-9ص) +1h .
🎲 اختبار 'السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته اختبار من إعداد الاستاذ( اسماء جمال) تتضمن- 25-سؤالاً (حنين)✍️ بــسم الله نبدأ' 🖊 25 سؤالًا · ⏱ 30 ث
قال سفيان الثوري رحمه الله : يا قَوْم! راقبوا الله؛ فإنَّما هي لحظة وقد يُقبض اللبيب. - حلية الأولياء (٨٢/٢) -
قال عمر بن الخطاب - رضي الله عنه - : "جالسوا التوابين فإنهم أرق شيء أفئدة " 📚- الزهد لوكيع ص٥٤٤
قَالَ ابْنُ أَبِيْ جَمْرَةَ - رَحِمَهُ اللّٰهُ تَعَالَى - : " مَنْ كَانَ صَادِقَ النِّيَّةِ لَا يَقَعُ إِلَّا فِيْ خَيْرٍ ، وَلَوْ قَصَدَ الشَّرَّ ، فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ يَصْرِفُهُ عَنْهُ " . 📚[ فَـتْـحُ الـبَـارِي (٦٠/٨) ]
(( هل نَرَي ربَّنا يومَ القيامةِ ؟ )) عن أبي هُريرة أن الناس قالوا : يا رسولَ اللهِ ! هل نَرَي ربَّنا يومَ القيامةِ ؟ قال رسولُ اللهِ ﷺ : " نعم ". قال : هل تُضارُّونَ في رُؤيَةِ الشمسِ بالظَّهِيرَةِ صَحْوًا ليس معها سَحَابٌ ؟ وهل تُضَارُّونَ في رُؤيَةِ القمرَ ليلةَ البَدرِ صَحْوًا ليس فيها سَحَابٌ ؟ قالوا : " لا . يا رسولَ اللهِ ! " قال ﷺ : ما تُضَارُّونَ في رُؤيَةِ اللهِ تبارك وتعالى يومَ القيامةِ إلا كما تُضَار…
"ويقال: (ستون سنة من إمام جائر أصلح من ليلة واحدة بلا سلطان) والتجربة تبين ذلك، ولهذا كان السلف كالفضيل بن عياض وأحمد بن حنبل وغيرهما يقولون: (لو كان لنا دعوة مجابة لدعونا بها للسلطان)". *مجموع الفتاوى جـ٢٨صـ٣٩١
🌼 إِخْواني، انتَبِهوا مِن غَفلَتِكُم، فَنَومُ الغَفلَةِ ثَقيلٌ، وشَمِّروا لآخِرَتِكُم، فإِنَّما الدُّنيا مَنزِلٌ، وفي طَريقِها مَقيلٌ .. 🌟 ابنُ الجوزي | بحرُ الدُّموع.
مــرآةٌ صافيـة ! سألني صديقٌ عن قول بعض علماء العصر أن من قرأ كتب العلامة العثيمين -رحمه الله- فقد حصَّل 90% من العلم، فقلت: هذه لطائف تشمُّ ولا تحكّ، ولعلَّ هذا العالم الفاضل قَصَدَ ما يحتاجه طالب العلم في زمن تأسيسه من المعارف، فهذا القول بهذا المعنى ليس بعيدًا عن الواقع .. لكن يستحق الشيخ من الثناء على معارفه أضعافَ ما قيل، فهو علامة بحقّ، لم تكد تنجب الجزيرة منذ قرون مثلَه في شموليَّته وصفاء ذهنه وحسن ترتيبه، ر…
"حتّى تَتيقن أنّ المَسألة هي مَسألة تَوفيق، انْظُر إلى الذِّكر مِن أسهَل الطاعاتِ، لكن لا يُوفق له إلّا قَليل". ـ ابن عثيمين
قال سفيان بن عيينة - رحمه الله - : " لولا ستْر الله عزَّ وجلَّ ما جالسَنا أحدٌ "
مواعظ ابن الجوزي pinned «ليالي الدنيا بدأت..! ليالي الغنيمة الكبيرة بدأت..! "يا من ضاع عمره في لا شيء استدرك ما فاتك في ليلة القدر فإنها تحسب بالعمر! يا ليلة القدر للعابدين اشهدي، يا أقدم القانتين اركعي لربك واسجدي، يا ألسنة السائلين جدي في المسألة واجتهدي". لطائف المعارف ط: ابن…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @effectisermon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 698,478 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@effectisermon named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مواعظ ابن الجوزي” (@effectisermon), 260 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/effectisermon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.