Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for .ellades

Channel

.ellades

@eilllisss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715905617
TypeChannel
Username@eilllisss
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eilllisss

Growth

1311351337 August 2026 — 132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 132 subscribers16 August 2026 — 131 subscribers24 August 2026 — 132 subscribers31 August 2026 — 133 subscribers9 September 2026 — 135 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 06:39135+2
31 Aug 2026, 14:02133+1
24 Aug 2026, 18:24132+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:25131-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:46132no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:50132first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54295650828476885412128.0%
💋1824.0%
custom 53710125324357203861722.7%
custom 53706636565372335621114.7%
custom 523326780306202375045.33%
custom 533279470225511644522.67%
custom 537065476165996398722.67%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC48 viewsread 9 August 2026

~ можно мне инструментал этой песни 10ти часовой пожалуйста

7 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC51 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

~ 🎎🎎впервые за долгое время смогла ВЕСЬ день провести наедине с собой без работы и реп хороший экспириенс, мне понравилось 🎏🎎 но моя спина такой мув повторять больше не захочет

💋8custom 53706636565372335627custom 53710125324357203866custom 53327947022551164452custom 53706547616599639872custom 52332678030620237501custom 54295650828476885411

6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC58 viewsread 9 August 2026

~ спасибо за солнце, жить захотелось

6 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC58 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 542956508284768854113💋10custom 53710125324357203867custom 52332678030620237503

6 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC52 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @exwywhoPhoto

спешим сообщить, что наши заявочки прошли на фаер 😌 ⭐⭐⭐сможете увидеть нас в 3 совершенно разных по вайбу номерах, такое упускать нельзя когда: 8 августа где: ДК им. Ленина, ул. Копылова 2А будем ждать вас на шоу 🌟

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @eilllisss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.ellades” (@eilllisss), 135 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eilllisss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.