Channel
@einstein_chimige
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,117subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001140093848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @einstein_chimige |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/einstein_chimige |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 3,117 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 3,119 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 3,115 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 3,120 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 3,121 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 3,122 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 3,121 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 3,119 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 3,118 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 3,120 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 3,127 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 3,131 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 3,132 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 3,132 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
همان طور که کارل پوپر فیلسوف علم استدلال کرده، هر نظریه ای برای علمی بودن باید ابطال پذیر باشد. فرضیه های اثبات ناپذیر جهان چندگانه، نظریه ریسمان و چند جهانی تورمی کاملا با نظریاتی که مستقیما با جهان واقعی رابطه دارند و از طریق مشاهده قابل آزمایش هستند مثل مدل استاندارد فیزیک ذرات و وجود ماده و انرژی تاریک، متفاوت اند. همان طور که می دانیم، فیزیک نظری با ریسک تبدیل شدن به ناکجاآبادی بین ریاضیات، فیزیک و فلسفه همراه …
چه فاکتورهایی اندازه جهان قابل مشاهده را تعیین می کند؟ در ستون محبوب "Ask Ethan" (به قلم اخترفیزیکدان معروف، ایتان سیگل در وبلاگ Starts With A Bang)، این موضوع یکی از جذابترین مباحثی است که او بارها به آن پرداخته است. پاسخ کوتاه به این سؤال این است: اندازه جهان قابل مشاهده (Observable Universe) حاصل رقابت و تعادل میان دو فاکتور اصلی است: «سرعت نور» و «نرخ انبساط بافت فضا-زمان از زمان بیگبنگ تا به امروز». اگر فرض…
معرف حضور هستن؟ #پست_فان_پنجشنبه_ها 🏋️♂️ @einstein_chimige 🧠
قدما فلسفه را به دو بخش نظری و عملی تقسیم می کردند. فلسفه نظری شامل طبیعیات و ریاضیات و متافیزیک بود و فلسفه عملی شامل اخلاق و تدبیر منزل و سیاست می شد. بدین ترتیب فیزیک متعلق به بخشی از فلسفه نظری موسوم به حکمت طبیعی بود. گالیله وقتی می خواست به فلورانس برود درخواست کرد که عنوان رسمی او فیلسوف و ریاضیدان باشد. نیوتون عنوان اصول ریاضی حکمت طبیعی را برای کتاب خود انتخاب کرد. هنوز نیز در بعضی از دانشگاه های جهان(از…
#پست_فان_پنجشنبه_ها 🏋️♂️ @einstein_chimige 🧠
🙌🏻
https://flip.it/gvm85P
Photo, posted without a caption
نت موندگار دارین؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
سلاااااااام
ایران به شهرونداش 7 دلار در ماه میده تا اعتراضات اروم شه. یه نفر کامنت گذاشته، من 8 دلار میدم، به اعتراض ادامه بدن.
#همیژوری_یوهویی
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @einstein_chimige. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نت موندگار دارین؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نت شما ضعیفه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انیشتین چی میگه؟؟؟🌏” (@einstein_chimige), 3,117 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/einstein_chimige.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.