Channel
@ekagors
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
741subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001746740192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ekagors |
| Created | 4 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ekagors |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 741 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 743 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 748 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 750 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 752 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 752 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
192 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 103 | 53.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 14.6% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 8.85% | |
| 😈 | 14 | 7.29% | |
| 💩 | 13 | 6.77% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.13% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.08% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Блин ребят, труд художников обесценился не из-за ИИ, а потому что мы обленились, вот Иванов и Брюллов! Чуваки реально в прошлое отправлялись и писали явление Христа народу там, последний день помпеи, вы вообще понимаете как опасно писать картину во время извержения вулкана? Вот и делайте выводы
🔥9🎃3🗿2🤡2🤯2💩1
Серия комиксов «Люди Арктики» уже в продаже! 👉 https://clck.ru/3V2HXX Что объединяет водителя погрузчика, портового инженера, этнографа, пожарного, водолаза и микробиолога? На первый взгляд — ничего... Но именно они каждый день делают Арктику местом, где рождается будущее целого поколения! Серия комиксов «Люди Арктики» объединяет пять самостоятельных историй о людях, чья работа редко оказывается в центре внимания…
❤🔥10🔥3🤡1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5💩1
А вот себе зону отдыха облагородил
😈14👍6❤🔥4💩3
Из новостей, я все еще работаю над компьютерной игрой (ее пришлось капитально переделывать) НО идет работа довольно бодро чему я рад. Работаю над небольшим онлайн квестом, очень маленькой командой, как только его закончу (надеюсь максимум недели через полторы) начну активно о нем рассказывать! Увы я не могу ничего показывать по обоим проектам, мне кажется что интерес от этого будет меньше чем уже на стадии готового…
😍10💩1
Короче бабке и деду дисреспект За то что я по сусекам искал пиратку Мне кажется можно было столько позитива словить, отговорив переносить релиз паука и просто попросить официально в ответ заценить этот прости господи фильм Или просто совместные сеансы 2 в 1 сделать тк сборы паука в любом случае ушли бы колобку (как было с Чебурашкой)
❤🔥10🤡1
Я ничего плохого к создателям колобка не имею… Но человека паука я им не прощу Кстати паук новый это че за пушка, реально превзошел все мои ожидания даже в плохом качестве и пиратской озвучке
❤🔥16🔥3💩2
Делал тут леттеринг… Еще один проект Кинопоиска в моем списке https://www.kinopoisk.ru/series/12253531/?socialAlias=NDI4NjcyNTA%3D
❤🔥7💩1
Если среди моей аудитории есть те , кто прям глубоко увлекается фанатским и кастомным Лего отпишите мне пожалуйста. У меня идея для проекта с фигурками, но я не понимаю где качественно делают дизайны и фигурки! Спасибо!
❤🔥9💩1
Успел сделать 3 варианта динамики в драках и пока не понимаю какая мне больше нравится частота кадров… Но покажу все 3
❤🔥13💩1
Общество летучих мышей Вот делаю всякое
❤🔥10😍3💩1
Делюсь нейроприколами
🔥9😍4💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ekagors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маленькие мысли ЕкаГОРа” (@ekagors), 741 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekagors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.