Channel
@ekimovskih
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,749subscribers
-82 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001086354401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ekimovskih |
| Description | CEO АКГ «Капитал». Эксперт по финансовой стратегии бизнеса. 📌Семинар для собственников —погружение в финансы https://clck.ru/3TsZgT Сайт https://clck.ru/38qZpN Анонсы меро https://clck.ru/32hW7u |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ekimovskih |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 6,749 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:48 | 6,756 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 6,757 | +8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:11 | 6,749 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 6,752 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 6,755 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 6,761 | +11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:10 | 6,750 | -1 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 6,751 | -3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 00:02 | 6,754 | +9 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 6,745 | -6 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 6,751 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 6,757 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 6,759 | +11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 6,748 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 6,755 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 6,766 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 6,770 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 6,781 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 6,782 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 49 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,541 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
204 reactions across 34 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 36.8% | |
| 👍 | 71 | 34.8% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 23.0% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.96% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.96% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.98% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJGLEH7 | 1 | 27 October 2026 | 27 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (63.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Зачем компании выходят на биржу, если можно взять кредит в банке? Деньги — очевидная, но далеко не единственная причина. Если посмотреть на реальные выпуски МСБ, у каждой компании своя логика. 5 причин. 1️⃣ Уйти от зависимости от банков Когда весь долг сосредоточен в одном-двух банках, любое изменение их кредитной политики бьёт по бизнесу. Биржа даёт второй источник финансирования. 2️⃣ Сделать долг удобным для св…
❤1
Биржевое финансирование или банковский кредит: что лучше для бизнеса Если коротко — это не взаимозаменяемые инструменты. А теперь подробнее разберу плюсы и минусы. ✅ Преимущества биржи — Условия проектирует сама компания. Фиксированная ставка, плавающая, в рублях или юанях — под свою модель. КЛС Трейд привлекла 39,5 млн юаней под 17%, когда ключевая ставка была 21%: в рублях деньги обошлись бы дороже. — Можно защит…
🔥2
Posted without readable text
Какой пункт у вас требует особого внимания перед выходом на биржу?
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Posted without readable text
Может ли средний бизнес привлечь деньги на бирже? Может, и это уже не единичные случаи. Когда я говорю собственникам о биржевом финансировании, первая реакция обычно такая: «Это для Газпрома и МТС, не для нас». На самом деле на бирже давно привлекают деньги компании сектора МСБ. Разберу на примерах. 1️⃣Отдельная площадка для МСБ существует с 2017 года. Мосбиржа создала «Сектор Роста» — отдельный сегмент для публич…
👍2🔥2
Недавно в Екатеринбурге прошёл круглый стол «Аудит и консалтинг: кто выигрывает в конкуренции за клиента». По его итогам в журнале «Эксперт-Урал» вышел мой комментарий. 💡Главная мысль в том, что надо подружить предпринимателя с финансами. Я постоянно вижу, как бизнес теряет деньги не из-за кризиса и не из-за рынка. Он просто не считает или считает неправильно. Ставки растут, неопределённости много, а элементарный …
👍2
«Финансы для меня — больная тема. Я продажник, а не финансист. Но за 3 дня я перестал бояться финансов». Это сказал Владимир, участник практикума «Деньги в бизнесе: приумножить и сохранить». И я очень хорошо понимаю, о чём он. Большинство собственников, с которыми я работаю и общаюсь, пришли в бизнес не из финансов. Один выстроил сильные продажи. Другой поднял бренд на маркетинге. Третий знает производство до послед…
👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
👍5
Приглашаю на открытый онлайн‑диалог «Жива ли Биржа? Актуальные кейсы по получению внебанковского финансирования». В кризисное время привычные пути финансирования закрываются, и бизнесу приходится искать новые инструменты. Разберём реальные кейсы и посмотрим, какие биржевые и внебанковские решения действительно работают в 2026–2027 годах. Вопрос привлечения финансирования остаётся одним из ключевых для среднего бизн…
❤2
Почему стратегия компании часто не переживает первого изменения ставки? Годовой финплан обычно строят одной линией: такая выручка, такая маржа, такая ставка по кредиту, такое сейчас время. Потом ЦБ двигает ставку, спрос проседает, себестоимость растёт, и план превращается в документ, который уже никто не открывает. Устойчивые компании держат не один план, а несколько сценариев и заранее знают, что делать, если сраб…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @ekimovskih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ekimovskih edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой пункт у вас требует особого внимания перед выходом на биржу?
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие проблемы вы сейчас испытываете в финансах бизнеса?
The shares total 213%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой у вас размер бизнеса?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бизнес как инвестиция|Ирина Екимовских” (@ekimovskih), 6,749 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekimovskih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.