Channel
@el00m
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,469subscribers
+349 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002417682480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @el00m |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/el00m |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 2,469 | +48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:13 | 2,421 | +62 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 2,359 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 2,345 | +50 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 2,295 | +27 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 2,268 | +48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 2,220 | +29 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 2,191 | +46 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 2,145 | +23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 2,122 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 2,120 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 2,120 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 23.9% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 14.7% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 12.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 8.26% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 6.42% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.917% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.917% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعضی وقتاهم اینجوریه که به خودت میای و میبینی ساعت هاست داری فکر میکنی، اما اگه یکی ازت بپرسه به چی فکر میکردی، حتی خودتم نمیدونی چی تو رو اونطوری غرق کرده بود، فقط میدونی برای مدتی اونجا نبودی...🥀
💯1😢1
چشمها همیشه چیزی رو نگه میدارن که آدمها حاضر نیستن به زبون بیارن...🥀 .
💯2👍1
بعضی حرفها شاید به مرور کمرنگ بشن، اما تلخیشون هرگز از بین نمیره🥀. .
👍2😭1
اگه میخوای شاغل بشی این دعـا رو بخون : @AyeDoaa 🤲🏻🏷 برای حاجت های مهمت این دعا رو بخون : @AyeDoaa 🥺🪄
☆ قربان صدقه های هر روزه ات را تزریق کن در دل و جانم من به عشق تـــــــــــــــــــو اعتیاد دارم شاه قلبم 🖇♥︎ 🦋🫂
🥰2❤🔥1🤗1
☆ اگه «د» بودی میشدی «دنیا» اگه «و» بودی میشدی «وفا» اگه «س» بودی میشدی «ستاره» اگه «ت» بودی میشدی «تپش» اگه «د» بودی میشدی «دلخوشی» اگه «آ» بودی میشدی «آرامش» اگه «ر» بودی میشدی «روشنایی» اگه «م» بودی میشدی «ماه» همه حروف داخل پرانتز رو بهم بچسبون! ♥️✨ 🦋🫂
❤4🥰2
نیمی از او میخواست تمام زیباییهای جهان را تجربه کند و نیمی دیگر میخواست همان لحظه بمیرد. در نتیجه نه زندگی میکرد و نه میمرد؛ در تداومی مضحک به سر میبرد.🥀
😢3💔2👌1
☆ مرا ببر آنجا که تو باشى ... من باشم ... و هیچ اثرى از پایِ رفتن نباشد...❤ 🦋🫂
❤2❤🔥2👌1👏1
☆ اگر درباره تو از من بپرسند، میگویم: ميان هياهوى روزگار او جان ميدهد به تن خسته ى من..♥︎ 🦋🫂
❤🔥2😍2❤1👌1🥰1
☆ بودَنَت بَرایِ مَن شُد زِندِگی شُددَلیل شُد اُمید شُد لَبخَند بودَنِت انقَدر قَشنگه کِه قُربون لَحظه به لَحظه بُودَنِت.♥︎ 🦋🫂
❤2🥰2👌1😍1
الهی دلتون برای هر چیز قشنگی که میتپه، خداوند همونو به دلتون بده 🫶 .
🥰4❤1👌1
☆ تو هیجان منی.. تو احساسه منی.. تو آدمه علاقه ی منی.. تو آفتاب منی.. تو عشق منی.. تو آدم درست منی.. تو مقصد منی.. تو هم روح منی.. تو تنها کسی هستی که آرزو میکنم.. دوستت دارم... 💋♥ 🦋🫂
❤3👌1💋1🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @el00m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 127 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@el00m named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🦋رویای پروانه ها🦋” (@el00m), 2,469 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/el00m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.