Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🥰2

Channel
@el_feth
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
608subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001646962413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @el_feth |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/el_feth |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 608 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 606 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 602 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 603 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 606 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 611 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 611 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
298 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 216 | 72.5% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 10.4% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 8.39% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 5.37% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 3.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10🥰2
Izvor: -Knjiga "Mudžahidi Arapi i Turci u Bosni i Hercegovini 1992–1995 i ostali dobrovoljci u Armiji RBiH". @el_feth
❤6👍3👏2🔥1
ULOGA ARAPSKIH MUDŽAHIDA U VOJNOJ I ISLAMSKOJ AFIRMACIJI 505. BUŽIMSKE BRIGADE 505 bužimska brigada, na čelu s njenim komandantom Izetom Nanićem, Allah mu se smilovao, isticala se svojom vojnom disciplinom i borbenom efikasnošću. Pored toga, ono što je 505. bužimsku brigadu izdvajalo među ostalim jedinicama Armije Republike Bosne i Hercegovine bio je primjetan islamski duh koji je vladao u njenim redovima, visok mor…
❤18🥰4👍2👏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6🥰2👏1🔥1
"Korist džihada je opća, kako u pogledu vjere tako i dunjaluka, i odnosi se i na onoga ko u njemu učestvuje i na onoga ko ne učestvuje. Džihad obuhvata sve unutrašnje i vanjske ibadete: ljubav prema Allahu, iskrenost prema Njemu, oslanjanje na Njega, žrtvovanje duše i imetka radi Njega, sabur, zuhd, spominjanje Allaha i sve ostale ibadete, onako kako ih nijedno drugo djelo ne obuhvata. Onaj ko vodi džihad, bilo da j…
❤14👍4🥰4🔥1
Iskrenim sinovima ummeta: Nemojte da vas vaše neprijateljstvo prema Iranskom projektu, iako je to neprijateljstvo na mjestu, navede da zanemarite gordost cionističkog pokreta i njegovu rastuću opasnost, koja je trenutno najveća opasnost, najveće zlo i najveća šteta. #Potop_Akse Ali El-Omer (Bivši emir pokreta Ahraru Šam) @el_feth
❤8👍1
RAZLIKA IZMEĐU FITNE MEĐU MUSLIMANIMA I BORBE PROTIV HARIDŽIJA Borbu protiv haridžija je Poslanik ﷺ naredio i preporučio, pa kako da bude isto ono što je on naredio i pohvalio i ono od čega je odvraćao i pohvalio onoga ko to ostavi? Onaj ko izjednači borbu koja se desila među ashabima u bitkama kod Deve i na Siffinu sa borbom protiv Zul Huvejsire Et-Temimija i njemu sličnih zabludjelih haridžija i agresora, njegov g…
❤8👍4🥰2👏1
FOTO:TAHRIRU ŠAM POGUBLJAVA HARIDŽIJE IDIŠA ODGOVORNE ZA ATENTATE PROTIV MUDŽAHIDA U IDLIBU 2018 GODINE @el_feth
❤7🔥2🥰1
Ako pogledamo u savremenu historiju, naći ćemo da su džihadski projekti bili popraćeni neuspjehom, i da su se okončavali bez ostvarenja svojih ciljeva, i primjetit ćemo je da je među ključnim karikama koje su nedostajale bilo shvatanje šerijatske politike. Šejh Ebu Jezen Eš-Šami rahimehullah (Istaknuti emir i šerijatski dužnosnik pokreta Ahraru Šam) @el_feth
❤12👍2👏1🥰1
Šta je vrijednije:Hadž ili Džihad? Prenosi Ebu Hurejre da je Allah Poslanik s.a.w.s. bio upitan: "Koje je djelo najbolje?" -On reče:"Vjerovanje u Allaha i Njegovog Poslanika." -"Zatim šta?" -"Džihad na Allahovom putu.", reče on. -"Zatim šta?" -On reče :"Primljen Hadž." (Bilježe Buhari i Muslim) Abdullah Ibn Omer r.a. je rekao:"Jedan odlazak u borbu na Allahovom putu je bolji od 50 obavljenih hadževa." (Bilježi Ib…
❤13👍2
DŽIHAD JE RIJEŠENJE ZA PODJELE I RAZILAŽENJA MEĐU MUSLIMANIMA Kada ljudi ostave džihad na Allahovom putu, Allah ih može iskušati tako što će među njih usaditi neprijateljstvo, pa da među njima nastane fitna, kao što to vidimo u praksi. Jer, kada se ljudi posvete džihadu na Allahovom putu, Allah zbliži njihova srca, usadi samilost među njima, a njihovu žestinu usmjeri prema Allahovom i njihovom neprijatelju. A kada …
❤12🔥3👏2👍1
"Oni koji odlaze u borbu na Allahovom putu, žrtvujući svoje duše u bitci istine, su obično najčasnija srca, najčišće duše i najplemenitije osobe." Sejjid Kutb rahimehullah @el_feth
❤15🥰2👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @el_feth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@el_feth named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“El-Feth” (@el_feth), 608 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/el_feth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.