Channel
@elizabeth_nott
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
840subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003697521518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elizabeth_nott |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elizabeth_nott |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 840 | +11 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 829 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 822 | +15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:09 | 807 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 811 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 814 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 813 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
311 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5204182860059150781 | 109 | 35.0% | |
| custom 5269257984030049588 | 70 | 22.5% | |
| custom 5368679007984317658 | 51 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5204372182217559134 | 30 | 9.65% | |
| 💘 | 22 | 7.07% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 5.47% | |
| custom 5366387488313080217 | 12 | 3.86% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ˏ 𝓒𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒉 𝒘 𝒂𝒆𝒏𝒖 ˊ ➩ « ваша первая переписка » #ronweasley #fredweasley #georgeweasley #cedricdiggory #leejordan ˏ мои повы в комментариях у прекрасной эну ٭
custom 536867900798431765823custom 52692579840300495889
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
Signed абрикосов саша
всем спасибо за анон тайм!! а я иду читать фф про Билла и Флёр🫶
💘13❤2
Signed абрикосов саша
подписка на прекрасную керу🫶 она моя любимая
Signed абрикосов саша
🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹🌹 🧁долго искал уютный канал с переписками, ботами, хэдканонами, разными историями, благодаря который можно с головой окунуться в мир любимого фандома? тогда тебе определенно сюда 🌹🌹🌹керу
custom 52692579840300495883custom 53663874883130802172custom 53686790079843176581
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed абрикосов саша
это пиздец вообще, накидайте жалобы на этот тгк
custom 536867900798431765815custom 52692579840300495881custom 53663874883130802171
Signed абрикосов саша
боже, происходит просто ужас, не смотрите пожалуйста, просто покидайте жалобы на этот канал @cutecats20 и на этот тоже, как только начнет что то скидывать https://t.me/h8_cats только правда, не смотрите, у меня слезы
💘7❤2custom 52692579840300495881custom 53686790079843176581
Signed абрикосов саша
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
Signed абрикосов саша
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @elizabeth_nott. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ˏ 𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒉 ⚯ ͛” (@elizabeth_nott), 840 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elizabeth_nott.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.