Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elon Musk

Channel

Elon Musk

@elonmusk_intel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

20,856subscribers

+4,300 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002515912669
TypeChannel
Username@elonmusk_intel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elonmusk_intel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,600 average views per post against 20,856 subscribers — an engagement rate of 55.8%. Across the 5,646 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.94% and 10.8%, with a median of 5.29%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (1 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled221,120
Mature posts only61.8% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,856 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 5,646 channels · p10 0.531% · p25 1.94% · p50 5.29% · p75 10.8% · p90 18.9%
Position in cohort99.362th percentile · 10.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.144% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,55126,75621,653.57 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,561 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,551 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,756 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,646 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,616 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,560 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,498 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,433 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,063 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,387 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,312 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,234 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,154 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,100 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,086 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,047 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,998 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,938 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,838 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,603 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,497 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,428 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,347 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,251 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,023 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,490 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,948 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,877 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,856 subscribers20,8567 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +4,300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,020–28,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:0220,856-21
15 Sept 2026, 02:5720,877-71
13 Sept 2026, 09:5620,948-1,542
11 Sept 2026, 13:3722,490-533
8 Sept 2026, 21:5623,023-228
5 Sept 2026, 15:1523,251-96
3 Sept 2026, 18:0123,347-81
2 Sept 2026, 13:3523,428-69
1 Sept 2026, 15:0423,497-106
31 Aug 2026, 15:2523,603-235
30 Aug 2026, 11:5423,838-100
29 Aug 2026, 15:1123,938-60
28 Aug 2026, 12:1323,998-49
27 Aug 2026, 12:4324,047-39
26 Aug 2026, 09:3824,086-14
25 Aug 2026, 12:4524,100-54
24 Aug 2026, 11:0624,154-80
22 Aug 2026, 19:1424,234-78
21 Aug 2026, 11:0524,312-75
20 Aug 2026, 11:4224,387first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.5%
avg views ÷ 20,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,000
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.748%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held57 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total197,220
Reactions total1,475
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 47m
Average length
2m 14s

Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,015 reactions across 57 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,14319.0%
💯1,10218.3%
👍1,08618.1%
1,03717.2%
🤯68211.3%
👏4938.20%
😱1592.64%
🙏1482.46%
🤔791.31%
👀761.26%
🤩40.067%
30.05%
👌20.033%
🎉10.017%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,015 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:28 UTC840 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🔻 CANCER TREATMENT IS ENTERING A NEW ERA There’s a cancer treatment where they don’t cut you open. They don’t poison you. They don’t burn you. And it’s FDA approved. They aim sound at the tumor. Actual ultrasound waves that literally shred cancer cells without touching the healthy tissue next to it. Wild. It’s called histotripsy. And the craziest part—patients walk out the same day, asking if anything even hap

👏299💯7👍6👀2

2 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,100 views88 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🚨 JUST IN: US House votes to condemn socialism and a whopping 192 DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT Final vote: 220-192 Read that again: 192 House Democrats, a vast SUPERMAJORITY, support socialism! This is terrifying. Vote RED in November because our nation depends on it! 🇺🇸 Join: @elonmusk✅️ ⚠️ FINAL WARNING: ACCOUNT AT RISK OF PERMANENT SUSPENSION ⚠️ We noticed that your account has not been properly linked to a v

💯46🤔18🤯14🔥91

1 Sept 2026, 22:14 UTC≈1,300 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

📜 THE SECRET COVENANT by John D Rockefeller 🩸 👹 Luciferian Blood Oath Pact When will humans wake up? © Dana Horochowski Join: @elonmusk✅️ ⚠️ FINAL WARNING: ACCOUNT AT RISK OF PERMANENT SUSPENSION ⚠️ We noticed that your account has not been properly linked to a verified phone number or recovery email. Due to recent security updates, all unverified accounts are being reviewed and removed from the platform. Your a

🔥36🙏85

1 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,230 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026

If you’ve been following this movement for any length of time, you already know the pattern. Important information appears in certain places first. Then it spreads. Then the original sources become harder to find. These five channels are currently among the most focused places for: • Med Bed Activation • Quantum Financial System • Juan O Savin • JFK Jr Command Center • Red Pill Project They are not general

👍217💯6👀3👌1

1 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,260 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026

The people who stay quiet and wait usually miss the important moments. The ones who stay connected and informed are the ones who understand what’s happening when things start moving faster. Right now, these channels are actively following the key pieces: • Med Beds and healing technology • The Quantum Financial System • Juan O Savin’s intelligence • The JFK Jr return narrative • The deeper Red Pill truth This

👍28👏6👀5🎉1🙏1

1 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,370 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

An autopsy study found the human heart looks like Swiss cheese after 5+ COVID booster shots… not with holes, but with lethal micro-scars. These micro-scars can trigger CARDIAC ARREST during intense exercise or in the early waking hours, leading to SUDDEN DEATH. Multiple micro-scars evenly scattered throughout the entire myocardium represent a deadly new form of cardiac injury that was NEVER seen before the COVID sh

🤯42🙏17🔥128💯1

31 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC≈1,500 views67 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Trending from the Epstein files… This clip has people talking, whether it’s confirmed or not. The fear in their eyes says enough. No victim should be forgotten. Join: @elonmusk✅️ ⚠️ FINAL WARNING: ACCOUNT AT RISK OF PERMANENT SUSPENSION ⚠️ We noticed that your account has not been properly linked to a verified phone number or recovery email. Due to recent security updates, all unverified accounts are being reviewe

😱29🙏1815🤔4👀1

31 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,390 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Most people only see fragments. One day it’s Med Beds. The next day it’s QFS. Then someone shares a Juan O Savin update. Then the conversation shifts to JFK Jr again. The problem is that everything is scattered. These five channels bring the important pieces together: • Med Bed Activation • Quantum Financial System • Juan O Savin • JFK Jr Command Center • Red Pill Project Each one has a clear focus. Toge

25👍16👀3🤔1

31 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,390 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026

A lot of people are tired of empty promises. They’ve been waiting for real movement on the things that actually matter — Med Beds, the Quantum Financial System, real intelligence, and the people who have been speaking the truth for years. That’s why these channels exist: • Med Bed Activation – Tracking the real status of Med Beds • Quantum Financial System – Updates on QFS and the financial reset • Juan O Savin

35🤔10🙏10👀6👍2

31 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈1,540 views101 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🚨 BREAKING: Health Sec. Bobby Kennedy MIC DROPS the ENTIRE Fake News fearmonger apparatus "In 10 years, there have been THREE measles deaths in America." "There are now about 1.2 MILLION deaths every year from food-induced illness!" "The media and certain demagogic politicians are constantly trying to SCARE us about infectious disease." "And we take the attention away from the chronic disease that is being caused

💯62👍2213👏4

30 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈22,600 views124 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

And here is: An American gets assaulted, humiliated, mishandled, manhandled, and removed during a Board of Elections meeting when she brings up election crimes and going before the grand jury to get free, fair, and legal elections. Beth (Elizabeth) Majeroni at a Chatham County, Georgia, Board of Elections meeting. Majeroni had raised concerns about ballot processing and filed a complaint with the Chatham County gr

🤯76😱2411🔥11👍2

29 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈22,900 views91 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🔥 DAVID BOWIE SAID IT ON TV. NOBODY LISTENED. 🔥 Watch the video. « What is black noise? » He answers. Like an opera singer. A note. The glass shatters. Because the vibration is no longer in the glass's « metabolism ». Then he goes further. The register where you can « crack a city or people ». A « noise bomb ». A « controlled bomb ». « Is it being tested in France? » The patent, he says, was sold the pre

33🤔23👍20🔥13🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @elonmusk_intel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elon Musk” (@elonmusk_intel), 20,856 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elonmusk_intel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.