Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭЛЯФИТТ

Channel

ЭЛЯФИТТ

@elyaafitt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,405subscribers

-190 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740037358
TypeChannel
Username@elyaafitt
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elyaafitt

Growth

10,40510,59510,5009 August 2026 — 10,595 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,595 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,578 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,574 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,559 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,543 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,535 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,531 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,513 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,508 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,489 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,478 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,468 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,464 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,452 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,442 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,436 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,434 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,433 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,427 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,405 subscribers9 August 20263 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 25 days, net -190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,377–10,624 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:5710,405-22
2 Sept 2026, 04:0610,427-6
1 Sept 2026, 04:3510,433-1
31 Aug 2026, 04:1610,434-2
30 Aug 2026, 03:0810,436-6
29 Aug 2026, 06:0210,442-2
28 Aug 2026, 02:5410,444-8
27 Aug 2026, 01:4410,452-12
26 Aug 2026, 01:1410,464-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:5410,468-10
23 Aug 2026, 10:3710,478-11
21 Aug 2026, 22:2710,489-19
20 Aug 2026, 19:2710,508-5
19 Aug 2026, 17:1610,513-18
18 Aug 2026, 15:1210,531-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:3510,535-8
16 Aug 2026, 16:0610,543-16
14 Aug 2026, 20:5710,559-15
13 Aug 2026, 09:4710,574-4
12 Aug 2026, 06:5210,578first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 10,405 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held49 (19 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total72,336
Reactions total766
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,380 reactions across 49 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥64346.6%
❤‍🔥40829.6%
🥰1188.55%
😍866.23%
👏654.71%
💘382.75%
🙏181.30%
💅40.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,380 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elyaafitt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC646 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcidwfCNT0K/?igsi=MWVvYTN0YjY4bXBjaw== Люди толстые , тк они бедные?

❤‍🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,170 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Привет! Думаю многие заметили, что я изменила ведения своего блога. Я давно хотела , но боялась , сжималась , откладывала. Поняла , что откладывать уже нельзя, нужно действовать , быть собой и чаще общаться. Показывать настоящее время, не бояться осуждения.

🔥31❤‍🔥6

24 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,440 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcbKdqjNMZ1/?igsi=MWY3aGIyaXBmbmg1OA== Давайте знакомиться 🫂

💘6

24 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Мне было тяжело записывать такое видео , но , рано или поздно до меня это дошло бы.

💘8

24 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,410 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘8❤‍🔥4🔥3

22 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,750 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcVstrONyCC/?igsi=MTNnNmQ4ZzlsMTJ1dA== Распаковка подарочков 😂 Эмоциональные качели знатные

🥰7

21 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,900 views92 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Извините , но это самый лучший День Рождения 🥹😭

🥰44❤‍🔥25👏14🔥8😍1

20 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC≈1,920 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DcRzFHsNMCB/?igsi=MWc5N2JldDVjZTIyOA== 28 🧿🎊

❤‍🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈2,060 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Как понять, что мы друзья? - по одежде

🔥31❤‍🔥8💘4

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @elyaafitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭЛЯФИТТ” (@elyaafitt), 10,405 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elyaafitt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.