另:招行网申渠道已下架 Hello Kitty 普卡联名卡面(金葵花版本暂未下架)。目前,与二刺螈略有关联的联名普卡仅剩哔哩哔哩花嫁联名卡、愤怒的小鸟联名卡(小小鸟系列6张、大鸟系列3张),以及非联名卡的宠物(猫咪、狗狗)。 柜面渠道仍可申请 Hello Kitty 预制卡卡板。(感谢 niming 投稿)
👎166😢16😁13🤮8💩7❤2👻1

Channel
@encmasuta
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
13,915subscribers
+4,409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002399548067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @encmasuta |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/encmasuta |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:34 | 13,915 | +17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:48 | 13,898 | +18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 01:38 | 13,880 | +29 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 13,851 | +28 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:06 | 13,823 | +24 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:35 | 13,799 | +21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 13,778 | +17 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 13,761 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 13,745 | +31 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 13,714 | +16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 13,698 | +27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 13,671 | +40 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 13,631 | +22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 13,609 | +24 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 13,585 | +17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 13,568 | +61 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 13,507 | +30 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 13,477 | +17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 13,460 | +29 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 13,431 | first reading |
70 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (29 July 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 162,340 |
| Reactions total | 2,819 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9,491 reactions across 69 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 3,340 | 35.2% | |
| 🤣 | 1,074 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 755 | 7.95% | |
| 🤡 | 713 | 7.51% | |
| ❤ | 472 | 4.97% | |
| 👎 | 362 | 3.81% | |
| 👏 | 343 | 3.61% | |
| 🤯 | 342 | 3.60% | |
| 🤔 | 304 | 3.20% | |
| 😱 | 288 | 3.03% | |
| 🔥 | 286 | 3.01% | |
| 🤬 | 188 | 1.98% | |
| 🙉 | 136 | 1.43% | |
| 🤮 | 127 | 1.34% | |
| 🥱 | 121 | 1.27% | |
| 😁 | 96 | 1.01% | |
| 🆒 | 80 | 0.843% | |
| 🤨 | 74 | 0.78% | |
| 😭 | 62 | 0.653% | |
| 🤷♂ | 48 | 0.506% | |
| 30 further kinds | 280 | 2.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,825 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @encmasuta. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 70 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
另:招行网申渠道已下架 Hello Kitty 普卡联名卡面(金葵花版本暂未下架)。目前,与二刺螈略有关联的联名普卡仅剩哔哩哔哩花嫁联名卡、愤怒的小鸟联名卡(小小鸟系列6张、大鸟系列3张),以及非联名卡的宠物(猫咪、狗狗)。 柜面渠道仍可申请 Hello Kitty 预制卡卡板。(感谢 niming 投稿)
👎166😢16😁13🤮8💩7❤2👻1
招商银行疑似不再允许经VTM换卡为价值认同卡 有 DP 显示,招商银行 VTM 换卡页面已不再显示价值认同卡(借记卡)。人工(客户经理及柜台)换借记卡仍可选择价值认同卡,但人工处理可能会根据任职信息审核。 注:价值认同卡并非面向全部客户发行的联名卡。价值认同卡一般是大型企业或学校合作定制的借记卡,原则上用于合作方员工代发工资/师生校园业务,以金卡和金葵花卡为主。价值认同卡的典型卡面如小米金葵花卡、招商局集团金葵花卡(俗称大船卡)等。此前,可通过 VTM 换出其中部分企业认同卡。 感谢 Haruka 投稿 原始DP可见 [1] [2]
💩80🤷♂5❤3
18家全国性银行均已提供免费微信动账提醒服务 随着今日起工商银行微信动账提醒服务不再与「工银信使」短信动账提醒业务挂钩(可单独开通微信动账提醒、信使取消不影响微信动账提醒),18家全国性商业银行现均已提供免费微信动账提醒服务。 注:招行微信动账提醒需联系APP内客服申请开通,且不会发送全部交易的动账提醒。 18家全国性商业银行:工农中建交邮 招商 中信 兴业 浦发 广发 民生 光大 华夏 平安 浙商 渤海 恒丰 感谢 Mason 投稿
👏148👍12🤓7💩6❤5👎1
中行现已优化2233卡网申进度查询功能 中国银行现已优化此次用于 bilibili 2233 联名借记卡申请的网申预约借记卡系统,在「制卡中」和「待领卡」之间新增「邮寄中」状态,故不再需要使用辅助工具查询网申进度。 不过,该页面仍未显示卡号(或打码卡号)。 感谢 可能过分 投稿
👍60❤5
中行2233万事达借记卡已补境外取现权益 须报名 中国银行现通过活动形式向 bilibili 2233 联名借记卡(万事达)持卡人提供每月一次的境外 ATM 取现发卡行侧手续费返还活动(先扣后返)。活动有效期为2026年11月11日至2027年10月31日,每个月需分别报名,报名入口为 https://shop.mcearnmore.com/shop/2026/09/zh-bz-lmk-fourth/index.html ---------- 另外,中国银行与万事达推出了部分2233万事达借记卡专属消费返现权益,报名入口同上。但是部分活动奖池大小较为精致,请留意。 海淘和指定境外线上商户2%消费返现 2026年11月1日至2027年10月31日,使用中国银行万事达哔哩哔哩2233联名借记卡,通过万事达卡网络在以下指定海淘和境外线上商户消费,可获得笔笔2%消费返现。每卡每月返现累计不超过人民币223.3元。本活动需要报名…
💩52🔥31❤5👍1
建亚现可自助转移流动保安密码 中国建设银行(亚洲)现会在新设备登录建行(港澳)APP时提示是否需要在此装置启动流动保安密码。选择启动并经安全验证冷静期后,流动保安密码即迁移至新设备。 此前,即使手动停用旧设备的建亚流动保安密码,新设备仍无法启用流动保安密码,需致电建亚从后台停用后才能在新设备重新启用。 感谢 Maizi 投稿
👍68❤4🥰3🤡2😁1
汇丰中国个人网银将不再提供转账等服务 客户需经手机银行等转账 汇丰银行(中国)正通过网银登录后条幅通知客户: 自2026年10月31日起,汇丰中国个人网上银行将停止提供转账及相关服务,请下载并登录汇丰中国手机银行或亲临分支行办理转账业务。 关联阅读:从 2025 年 12 月 14 日开始,同为汇丰集团的恒生银行(中国)已关闭个人网银,相关功能均整合至恒生中国手机银行。
😱91💩54🤡27😁7👍4🤔2🖕1😢1
本文近期更新: 1.新增中国银行万事网联“科学之光”专属借记卡 2.更新中信银行魔兽世界联名借记卡相关信息 3.其他文案描述调整
❤32🥰2💩1
汇丰香港停止接受Plus提款卡申请 自10月13日起,汇丰香港暂停受理 PLUS 自动柜员机芯片卡(俗称 PLUS 提款卡)的新申请。在2026年10月13日或之后提交申请,申请将不会被受理,直至另行通知。 感谢 大白熊, Haruka 投稿
😱106💩26🤷♂11😁8😭7❤1👍1🤔1
[教程]中行信用卡解除锁卡后如何恢复Apple Pay卡使用 在一键锁定中国银行信用卡后,信用卡对应的 Apple Pay 虚拟卡会提示「中国银行已暂停这张卡的使用」。而解除锁定主卡后,对应的 Apple Pay 虚拟卡不会自动解锁。 如需解除锁定 Apple Pay 虚拟卡,需按如下操作解锁: 1. 打开中国银行App 2. 首页 「更多」->支付分类下的 「Apple Pay」 3. 左右滑动选择卡片 4. 点击卡面图 5. 点击「卡片状态 已挂失」右侧的「恢复」 此详情页还可修改 Apple Pay 卡的小额免密限额。 编辑碎碎念:之前卡面图上有个不起眼的ⓘ用来进这个详情界面,现在连ⓘ都不显示了,颇有一番让用户发掘彩蛋的巧思,予人「椅子竟然可以坐」般的惊喜。
🤣83💩13💯6👍3🤔2😁2❤1
有关中国银行借记卡维护卡片印制姓名的相关信息 众所周知,中国银行已开立的借记卡的卡片印制姓名是可被维护的。 而要想卡姓名被打印在卡上,需要同时满足几个条件: 1.卡信息中的“卡片印制姓名”栏位被正确维护 2.卡板中预留了打印姓名的位置 3.卡厂支持印制姓名 但实际上,由于中行的系统(渣)问题(IT),即便满足上述条件,也不一定能维护成功,本文试图通过中行新、旧系统关于此部分的对比来进行一些探究。 早年间,在中行使用“IT蓝图”旧交易系统时,可通过以下三种方式维护借记卡姓名信息: 37250-换非预制卡 G04012-综合换卡 37210-维护卡片详细信息 其中,G04012、37210需远程授权,37210还需提供“个人客户信息维护申请表”。 早年间,由于当年各卡厂配置参数的不同,部分卡厂即便维护后也无法打印。 而近年,中行逐步将交易核心系统更换为了“绿洲”系统,在新系统下维护借记卡信息可使用以下方式: 8003325…
💩141🤣41🤯9❤8🥱3👍2🤔1
Welab计划推出港美股交易服务 香港 Welab 汇立银行计划于不早于10月24日逐步推出港美股交易服务,现已发出收费表修改告知。 - 港股净佣0.1% 最低收费13港币 - 美股净佣0.0099美元/股 最低收费1.99美元 相较于其他数字银行的港股服务,Welab 汇立银行的交易佣金收费比例大幅高于众安、大象现行收费。但由于其港股收费的起步价较低,在交易金额较低、频次较低时仍有些许优势。 相较于其他数字银行的美股服务,Welab 汇立银行的收费标准与当前主流收费标准基本相同。 Welab 汇立银行并未在价目表中提及衍生品交易相关收费。 详见 Welab 汇立银行提供的新收费表格 https://www.welab.bank/uploads/welab-general-service-charges-tc-20261024-clean.pdf 感谢 Haruka, Shadow SUS, lamonce 投稿 …
💩88👎6❤4🤡3🤯2👍1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @encmasuta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@encmasuta edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“encmasuta” (@encmasuta), 13,915 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/encmasuta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.