Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فیزیک اندیشه

Channel

فیزیک اندیشه

@endishea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,213subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355275312
TypeChannel
Username@endishea
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/endishea

Growth

4,2134,2414,2276 August 2026 — 4,241 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,237 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,230 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,232 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,226 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,221 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,217 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,213 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,209–4,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 20:474,213-4
27 Aug 2026, 15:074,217-4
24 Aug 2026, 10:164,221-5
20 Aug 2026, 12:484,226-6
17 Aug 2026, 09:364,232+2
14 Aug 2026, 00:164,230-7
10 Aug 2026, 13:524,237-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:304,240-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:524,241first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
10m 28s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

247 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11245.3%
👍6626.7%
🔥3112.6%
👎156.07%
👏62.43%
👌41.62%
👀31.21%
💯20.81%
😁20.81%
🤯20.81%
😱10.405%
🙏10.405%
🤝10.405%
🥰10.405%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC956 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @physic_factVideo

ویدیوی علمی ستارگان جاودانه: «چگونه ماده تاریک می‌تواند باعث عمر جاودان ستارگان شود» Credit: Melodysheep YouTube Channel در مرکز کهکشان راه شیری، خوشه‌ای از ستارگان کشف شده‌اند که دانشمندان را سردرگم کرده‌اند؛ طوری که انگار برای همیشه جوان مانده‌اند. یک نظریه جدید، توضیحی شگفت‌انگیز و مغز درگیر کننده ارائه می‌دهد که می‌تواند درک ما از تحول ستارگان را کاملاً بازنویسی کند: این ستارگان ممکن است از ماده تاریک تغذیه ‌کنند

👍3

10 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,120 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @physic_factVideo

کیهانشناسی کوانتومی (quantum cosmology) Creadit by: closer to truth «کوانتوم» نظریه‌ای درباره‌ی چیزهای فوق‌العاده ریز و «کیهان‌شناسی» هم درباره‌ی مطالعه‌ی چیزهای فوق‌العاده بزرگه. این دو تا جالب‌تر می‌شن وقتی به ابتدای جهان نگاه می‌کنیم؛ زمانی که کل جهان از کوچک‌ترین ذره هم کوچیک‌تر بوده! حالا اینکه بگیم «جهان یک تابع موج کوانتومی داره» اصلا یعنی‌چی؟ و ویژگی‌های کوانتومیِ فضا-زمان چه‌چیزی هستن؟ . لورا مرسینی هاتن، کی

9

8 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC881 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @physic_fact

لیستی از مجموعه‌ آموزنده‌ی فیزیک تقدیم به شما عزیزان و علاقه‌مندان به دانش و علم فیزیک: . 🔻کانال فیزیک کوانتوم، تئوری کوانتوم به زبان ساده بدون استفاده از ریاضیات برای علاقه‌مندان به کوانتوم. Channel: @quantum_by_sedighi . 🔻کانال اصلی ما مرتبط با دانش‌ همه‌فهم فیزیک. Channel: @physic_fact . 🔻کانال کیهانشناسی و نجوم، اخبار و مطالب آموزنده. Channel: @news_cosmology . 🔻ربات فیزیک، رباتی پر از موضوعات جذاب فیزیک. Bot: @

2

28 Jun 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,540 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

این است که طبیعت به طرز عظیم و غیرقابل‌تصوری، بسیار بزرگ‌تر از آن چیزی است که حواس روزمره ما نشان می‌دهند. مشاهدات انسانی محدود به روزنه‌های کوچکی به دنیای عظیم و حیرت‌انگیز کوانتومی از احتمالات درهم‌آمیخته است. 📚 کتاب «کوانتوم ۲.۰: گذشته، حال و آینده فیزیک کوانتوم» نوشته پل دیویس #پائول_دیویس #Paul_Davies ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

6

28 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,540 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

مصاحبه با پل دیویس، فیزیکدان برجسته، درباره فیزیک کوانتوم منبع: BBC Sky at Night Magazine بدون فیزیک کوانتوم، شما نمی‌توانستید این مطلب را بخوانید. دانشمندی مفهوم ذهن‌بُروزی را توضیح می‌دهد که زیربنای تمام زندگی ماست فیزیک کوانتوم برای بسیاری از مردم، حتی اگر عاشق علم باشند، موضوعی ترسناک به نظر می‌رسد. درهم‌تنیدگی (Entanglement)، برهم‌نهی (Superposition)، دوگانگی موج-ذره (Wave-particle duality) — نگاهی کوتاه ب

7👍3

13 Nov 2025, 20:01 UTC≈3,700 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

نسبیت عام اینشتین برایان گرین توضیح می‌دهد. #برایان_گرین #Brian_Greene ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

9

17 Oct 2025, 05:09 UTC≈3,280 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

درون سیاهچاله چی هست؟ #نیل_دگراس_تایسون #Neil_deGrasse_Tyson ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

5👍2

16 Sept 2025, 14:53 UTC≈4,030 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

چشمان ما فقط ابعاد بزرگ را می‌بینند، اما فراتر از آنها، ابعاد دیگری وجود دارند که به دلیل کوچک بودنشان، از دید پنهان می‌مانند. #برایان_گرین #Brian_Greene ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

7👍5🤯2

24 Aug 2025, 16:11 UTC≈4,370 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

انرژی تاریک چیست؟ توضیحات #نیل_دگراس_تایسون و #برایان_گرین درمورد انرژی تاریک #Brian_Greene #Neil_deGrasse_Tyson ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

8👎1

2 Jul 2025, 18:00 UTC≈4,590 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

سفر به درون سیاهچاله #نیل_دگراس_تایسون #Neil_deGrasse_Tyson ☢ کانال اصلی ☢ 🆔 @endishea

9👎1

13 Jun 2025, 16:38 UTC≈5,940 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026

راوی: جنگ بشه از کشور میری؟ + نادرشاه: وقتی جنگل آتش میگیره، درختان فرار نمیکنند؛ حیوانات فرار میکنند ما اینجا ریشه در خاکیم..

🔥30👍1713👎9😁2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @endishea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 294,371 of 1,629,419 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال علمی بیگ بنگ
@big_bangpage · 39,150
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
| فروغ_ شاملو |
@foroogh_shamloo · 51,985
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فیزیک اندیشه” (@endishea), 4,213 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endishea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.