Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for >жіжа балдьож

Channel

>жіжа балдьож

@energyj1ja

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485593310
TypeChannel
Username@energyj1ja
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/energyj1ja

Growth

3234339 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32 subscribers9 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 13:1332-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:4533-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:1634+1
11 Aug 2026, 01:4633no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:4733first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
🕊125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

>з сумного цей шедевр більше не продають в Варусі але я постараюся якось вибратись на розвідку в Fozzy і глянути там >ще наче мав би бути в Ашані

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC25 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>NON STOP SHOT ORANGE VIBE >тупо те ж що і тропік щодо гірчинки і того як приєбашило енергією >але власне з присмаком апельсинів >нічого такого але сподобався більше ((всі інші показники такі ж як у тропіка)) >загальне: 8.5/10

31 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC39 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>не прикольно бо ви забираєте самий оригінальний напій на ринку ((Чінотто)) і даєте манго персик який вже всіх заїбав

1

31 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>REDBULL THE ICE EDITION VANILLA BERRY >пацани нас наїбали воно ідентичне. >оцінка з тих часів впала до 8/10 бо тупо нецікаво 😔

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC37 viewsread 11 August 2026

>спостереження: дуже їбануло в голову прям що я відчуваю кожну венку і як мозок активується і краще концентрується ((подивимось чи моя нейровідмінність змусить мене заснути на роботі.))

30 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC26 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>NONSTOP SHOT TROPIC >єбать воно гірке >розумію що тому що концентроване піздєц але йой >смак як у мультифруктового соку але з гірчинкою >як в'їбе подивимось через годинку хоча б >але я щось відчуваю що мені він з всіх скоріш за все сподобається найменше >для розуміння я раніше вже пив шоти коли часто їздив на змагання по бейсболу але може я якісь такі брав що вони не гірчили як цей... >соу фар не дуже цікаво >смак

30 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

>шотік

  1. ориг14%
  2. тропік57%
  3. орандж вайб29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>REDBULL SUMMER EDITION SUDACHI LIME ZERO SUGAR >прикольний лимонад >не занадто кислий хоча я був би не проти щоб тут її було більше >також мені псував вайб оцей стереотипний смак "шугар фрі" ((той ж що у білого монстра)) >тому наче і да а наче і не думаю що хотів би пити його знову >де: РетроМагаз >кіко: 165₴ але краще беріть або оптом або в наборі Потужний >смак: 6/10 >оригінальність: 9/10 >баночка: 8/10 лише то

28 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

>цікаві штуки від underwood: underwood.beer/product/blood-fury/ underwood.beer/product/stroom-energy-drink-apple-vanilla/

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @energyj1ja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTCFinal Results7 voters

>шотік

  1. ориг14%
  2. тропік57%
  3. орандж вайб29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“>жіжа балдьож” (@energyj1ja), 32 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/energyj1ja.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.