Вставте правильний артикль: The candidate has ___ strong background in sales.
- a) a58%
- b) an5%
- c) the17%
- d) –21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4

Channel
@engimproving
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,492subscribers
-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001519580283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @engimproving |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/engimproving |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 10,492 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 10,499 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 10,505 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 10,510 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 10,513 | -5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 10,518 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 10,524 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 10,530 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 10,532 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 10,541 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 10,542 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 10,544 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 10,545 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 10,540 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 10,545 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 10,547 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 10,548 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 10,554 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 10,559 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 10,562 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (6 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,746 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
250 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 79 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 28.4% | |
| 👍 | 62 | 24.8% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 7.60% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 3.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вставте правильний артикль: The candidate has ___ strong background in sales.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Коли використовувати "best regards", а коли "yours sincerely": етикет у підписі листа Закінчення листа може сказати про вас більше, ніж здається. Обрати правильний варіант підпису — це справжній етикет. Ось кілька підказок: 🟣 "Yours sincerely" — використовується для формальних листів, коли ви звертаєтеся до конкретної людини (наприклад, "Dear Mr. Johnson"). 🟣 "Yours faithfully" — підходить для формальних листів, ко…
❤7👍1
Оберіть правильний варіант: If we had more resources, we ___ the project faster.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏4
Як правильно висловлювати ввічливу незгоду англійською Висловлювати незгоду — це мистецтво, особливо в професійному середовищі. Важливо зробити це ввічливо, щоб зберегти позитивну атмосферу та уникнути конфліктів. Ось кілька фраз, які допоможуть: ▫️ "I see your point, but…" — Я розумію вашу точку зору, але… ▫️ "I respect your opinion, however…" — Я поважаю вашу думку, проте… ▫️ "That’s an interesting idea, but have…
🥰6
Як правильно висловлювати подяку англійською: фрази для різних ситуацій Вміння висловити вдячність — важливий елемент спілкування в англійській мові, особливо у професійній сфері. Ці фрази допоможуть вам звучати щиро та професійно: ▫️ "Thank you for your effort." — Дякую за ваші зусилля. ▫️ "I truly appreciate your support." — Я щиро ціную вашу підтримку. ▫️ "Many thanks for your assistance." — Щиро дякую за вашу д…
❤10👍5🔥1
Оберіть правильний варіант: By Friday, the team ___ the final proposal.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥4🥰2
Вставні слова в англійській: робимо мовлення плавним та переконливим Вставні слова (linking words) допомагають з’єднувати частини речень, додавати інформацію, показувати причину чи наслідок, виражати контраст або підводити підсумки. Вони роблять мовлення зрозумілішим і професійним. Ось основні категорії вставних слів із перекладом та прикладами: 🟣 Для зв’язку ідей або контрасту: ▫️ However — однак. "I thought it …
🔥10❤2
Перекладіть речення: “She is responsible for handling customer complaints.”
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤩4🔥3
Вставте правильне слово: The company has decided to ___ its new service in September.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏5🔥1
Як описувати характер англійською: ключові слова та фрази Описуючи людей, варто використовувати різноманітну лексику, яка допоможе тобі виражати свою думку чітко та природно. 🟣Позитивні риси характеру ▫️Reliable — надійний ▫️Honest — чесний ▫️Generous — щедрий ▫️Friendly — дружелюбний ▫️Hard-working — працьовитий ✔️He's always reliable and never lets you down — Він завжди надійний і ніколи не підводить. 🟣Негативн…
🔥7❤6🤩2
📊 Data Analytics — одна з тих сфер, де попит на спеціалістів зростає швидше, ніж ринок встигає їх готувати. Причина проста. Компанії вже давно навчилися збирати дані. Тепер їм потрібні люди, які можуть ці дані зрозуміти та перетворити на конкретні рішення для бізнесу. Саме тому аналітиків шукають у: ▪️ IT ▪️ e-commerce ▪️ маркетингу ▪️ фінансах ▪️ логістиці ▪️ продуктових компаніях На безкоштовному марафоні від G…
❤3
Перекладіть слово “negotiate” у бізнес-контексті:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @engimproving. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вставте правильний артикль: The candidate has ___ strong background in sales.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Оберіть правильний варіант: If we had more resources, we ___ the project faster.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Оберіть правильний варіант: By Friday, the team ___ the final proposal.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Перекладіть речення: “She is responsible for handling customer complaints.”
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вставте правильне слово: The company has decided to ___ its new service in September.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Перекладіть слово “negotiate” у бізнес-контексті:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CATENGLISH | Англійська для кар'єри” (@engimproving), 10,492 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engimproving.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.