Channel
@engineerreshaet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
532subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001986111628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @engineerreshaet |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/engineerreshaet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 532 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 533 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 534 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 534 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
140 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 37.1% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 30.0% | |
| 🦄 | 32 | 22.9% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.00% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.86% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔘 Все видео форума #ИнженерыРешают уже в группе Собрали в одном месте: установочный доклад Андрея Волкова, панельную дискуссию с ректорами вузов страны, лекции, выступления спикеров и другие форматы форума Если что-то пропустили или хочется пересмотреть — теперь всё доступно в группе Офиса трансформации ДГТУ в ВК 🤍Пусть эти записи станут поводом вернуться к самым важным мыслям — или открыть их для себя впервые
❤6🔥3🦄2
⭐️То самое видео, которого все ждали В группе — доступен установочный доклад Андрея Волкова, который открывал форум #ИнженерыРешают. Многие спрашивали о нём, и вот он уже доступен для просмотра ➡️Также выкладываем панельную дискуссию, объединившую ректоров вузов со всей страны — разговор о том, куда движется инженерное образование Смотреть оба видео — в группе Офиса трансформации ДГТУ в ВК
❤7🔥5🦄4
👀Часть первая: лекции и доклады форума #ИнженерыРешают уже здесь Знаем, что давно не было новостей — но идеи форума никуда не делись, и мы возвращаемся с записями Внутри — выступления спикеров о будущем инженерного образования и другие форматы форума Все видео — в группе Офиса трансформации ДГТУ в ВК ❤️Форум #ИнженерыРешают собирал тех, кому не всё равно, каким будет инженерное образование завтра. И часть этого р…
🔥7🦄4🥰1
😊 Форум позади, а фото — уже здесь Все кадры с форума #ИнженерыРешают доступны по ссылке — забирайте на память
❤9🔥3🦄2
Форум завершился, но для нас работа продолжается Нам очень важно узнать, каким вы увидели #ИнженерыРешают. Что получилось особенно хорошо? Что стоит изменить? Какие идеи вы хотели бы увидеть в следующем году? Заполнение формы займет всего пару минут, а ваши ответы помогут сделать форум еще лучше 📝 Заполнить форму обратной связи
❤7🔥3🦄2
IV форум #ИнженерыРешают завершился🤍 Два дня, десятки спикеров, сотни участников со всей страны — и идеи, которые продолжат жить далеко за пределами форума Заполнить форму обратной связи
🔥10❤4🦄4
Video message, posted without a caption
🦄4❤3🔥2
🔼Подведение итогов IV форума #ИнженерыРешают! Два дня форум объединял университеты, индустрию, исследователей, преподавателей и студентов, чтобы вместе обсудить, каким должно быть инженерное образование и как университетам отвечать на вызовы технологического развития🔴 За эти два дня участники: 🔴обсудили ключевые вызовы на панельной дискуссии с ректорами ведущих инженерных университетов страны 🔴познакомились с усп…
❤9🔥7🦄5
🙌От обсуждения — к решениям На форуме завершилась проектная работа — формат, где участники обменивались мнениями и вместе работали над конкретными предложениями для развития инженерного образования В карточках собрали главное: о чем говорили участники и какие идеи обсуждали ➡️Круглые столы позволили собрать разные взгляды на актуальные вопросы инженерного образования и наметить возможные направления дальнейшей раб…
❤7🥰3🔥2🦄2
😊Командное проектирование в самом разгаре Сейчас они что-нибудь придумают…
😁7🎉3🦄3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @engineerreshaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 188,131 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#ИнженерыРешают” (@engineerreshaet), 532 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engineerreshaet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.