Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for حقوق مهندسی و قراردادنویسی

Channel

حقوق مهندسی و قراردادنویسی

@englaw7

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

466subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001116676055
TypeChannel
Username@englaw7
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/englaw7

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4284664477 August 2026 — 432 subscribers7 August 2026 — 432 subscribers15 August 2026 — 428 subscribers29 August 2026 — 442 subscribers5 September 2026 — 449 subscribers13 September 2026 — 466 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 15:38466+17
5 Sept 2026, 12:57449+7
29 Aug 2026, 11:08442+14
15 Aug 2026, 00:18428-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:01432no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:48432first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡ انجمن مهندسان برق تهران ( رضازاده مظلوم ) پیام تخصصی مهندسی برق شماره ۱۵ EBTE-015 🔹 پاسخ پرسش پیام شماره ۱۴ خیر. داشتن گواهی استاندارد برای تک‌تک تجهیزات، به‌تنهایی انطباق کل سیستم را اثبات نمی‌کند. در موضوع کیفیت توان، باید تأثیر متقابل بارها، امپدانس شبکه، نقطه اتصال مشترک (PCC)، شرایط بهره‌برداری و سطح اعوجاج ایجادشده در شبکه نیز بررسی شود. به همین دلیل، ارزیابی باید در سطح System Performance انجام شود، نه

25 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC226 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

۲. وحدت رویه در تابلو مشخصات ساختمان و درج اسم مهندس برق و مکانیک

25 Jul 2026, 22:05 UTC209 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

۱.‌ وحدت رویه در تابلو مشخصات ساختمان و درج اسم مهندس برق و مکانیک

23 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC142 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elec511

چرا عبارت «اجرا مورد تأیید است» می‌تواند برای مهندس ناظر دردسرساز باشد؟ یکی از رایج‌ترین اشتباهات در گزارش‌نویسی مهندسان ناظر، استفاده از عباراتی مانند «اجرا مورد تأیید است» یا «عملیات اجرایی تأیید می‌شود» است. در نگاه اول، این جمله کاملاً عادی به نظر می‌رسد؛ اما از نظر حقوقی، ممکن است دامنه مسئولیت مهندس ناظر را فراتر از حدود قانونی او گسترش دهد. واقعیت این است که وظیفه مهندس ناظر، بازدید از عملیات اجرا و ا

18 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

نمونه قرارداد فنی ؛ حقوقی مجریان

23 Feb 2026, 08:42 UTC350 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nazeran_mojrian_bartar

#پرسش_پاسخ ☸️پرسش خانم مهندس مریم: سلام اگر کسی بخواد به عنوان عضو امتیاز آور و سهام‌دار تو یه شرکت مشغول به کار بشه، آیا مثل زمانی که فرد فقط مدرکشو میذاره، ممکنه پیامدهایی براش داشته باشه؟ ✳️پاسخ از جناب مهندس مارتین درمیناسیان: سلام توضیح مختصر بدهم. شما وقتی یک جایی کار میکنید حتی اگر یک آبدارچی ساده هم باشید بسته به شرح وظایفتان مسولیت دارید چه برسه به مهندس و طراح. وقتی شما تو یک شرکت مشغول بکار میشید، امتیاز

23 Feb 2026, 07:46 UTC230 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nazeran_mojrian_bartar

#پرسش_پاسخ ☸️پرسش خانم مهندس آذرپیکان: سلام در کاری که تو مرحله سقف ها به دلیل مثلا خروج از صلاحیت ناظر ، مجبور به تعویض ناظر و گرفتن ناظر جدید بشود ، آیا ناظر جدید که از یک مرحله ای وارد کار شده و باید پایانکار بدهد و در جریان کیفیت اجرای فونداسیون و سازه تا این مرحله نبوده است مسئولیتی در قبال اونها دارد یا خیر؟ ✳️پاسخ از جناب مهندس حامد عاصم: سلام ناظر دوم بر اساس ۱- گزارشات تخلف و مرحله‌ای دوره نظارت ناظر اول

1 Feb 2026, 18:55 UTC325 viewsread 7 August 2026

تغییرات قانون و ماده ها و تبصره های جدید قانون نظام مهندسی ساختمان

8 Jan 2026, 14:32 UTC458 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

گزارش ملی بررسی حادثه ساختمان پلاسکو #گزارش_ملی_بررسی_حادثه_ساختمان_پلاسکو #هیأت_ویژه_گزارش_ملى_بررسى_حادثه_ساختمان_پلاسکو #گزارش_ملی #بررسی_حادثه #حادثه #ایمنی #ساختمان #پلاسکو #گزارش #آتش_سوزی #آتشنشانی #حریق #آتش #شهرداری #کنترل_ساختمان #تهران #شهرداری_تهران #محمد_تقی_احمدی #علی_اکبر_آقا_کوچک #سعید_بختیاری #فرج_اله_رجبی #شاپور_طاحونی #نصراله_طهماسبی #محمد_فاضلی #سید_باقر_مرتضوی #رسول_میرقادری #مهدی_هداوند #پلاسک

3 Jan 2026, 18:32 UTC250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کتاب 📙 از ناظر برق مبتدی تا حرفه ای👷‍♂️ هم اکنون در سریری کلاب 👈لینک خرید👉 وجه تمایز: ۱. ارجاع بند قانونی مقررات ملی جلو پرانتز هر بند ۲. لیست نظارتی برق در هر مرحله از ساخت و ساز 👈لینک خرید👉 1️⃣ مشاهده فهرست کتاب💫 2️⃣ مشاهده نمونه صفحات کتاب❕️ 3️⃣ مشاهده منابع کتاب👌 👈لینک خرید👉

3 Jan 2026, 18:32 UTC195 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnjomanBarghAlborzPhoto

💥💥مکاتبه انجمن مهندسان برق استان البرز با استاندار و مدیرکل اداره راه و شهرسازی استان درخصوص توجه بیشتر شهرداری‌ها به گزارشات مهندسان و اجرای وظایف قانونی 💥💥 انجمن مهندسان برق استان البرز https://t.me/AnjomanBarghAlborz http://www.aeeea.ir

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @englaw7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حقوق مهندسی و قراردادنویسی” (@englaw7), 466 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englaw7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.