Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FriEnglish ☀️| Английские викторины

Channel

FriEnglish ☀️| Английские викторины

@englishProt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,523subscribers

-198 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267291174
TypeChannel
Username@englishProt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/englishProt

Growth

13,52313,72113,6226 August 2026 — 13,721 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,721 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,719 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,717 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,703 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,679 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,674 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,664 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,656 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,646 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,644 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,638 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,630 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,621 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,617 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,609 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,601 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,593 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,585 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,580 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,571 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,567 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,562 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,556 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,552 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,535 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,523 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net -198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,493–13,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 10:5913,523-12
7 Sept 2026, 02:5513,535-17
4 Sept 2026, 09:2113,552-4
2 Sept 2026, 19:1613,556-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:2613,562-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:5313,567-4
30 Aug 2026, 16:3513,571-9
29 Aug 2026, 13:3413,580-5
28 Aug 2026, 13:1313,585-8
27 Aug 2026, 12:1413,593-8
26 Aug 2026, 11:1313,601-8
25 Aug 2026, 09:5813,609-8
24 Aug 2026, 12:2713,617-4
22 Aug 2026, 22:0813,621-9
21 Aug 2026, 08:3813,630-8
20 Aug 2026, 10:2513,638-6
19 Aug 2026, 13:5813,644-2
18 Aug 2026, 15:3213,646-10
17 Aug 2026, 14:0513,656-8
16 Aug 2026, 08:2413,664first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.96%
avg views ÷ 13,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
400
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held81 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total19,618
Reactions total381
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

576 reactions across 81 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34960.6%
11219.4%
🔥7813.5%
🤔111.91%
🤩101.74%
🥰81.39%
👏40.694%
😁40.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 576 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC208 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

He ___ the blame for the whole team. — Он взял вину на себя за всю команду.

  1. shouldered31%
  2. armed7%
  3. handed46%
  4. backed17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3🔥31

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC210 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Cumbersome [ˈkʌmbəsəm]

  1. Громоздкий58%
  2. Ветхий22%
  3. Шаткий20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍5🤩21

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC206 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Lurk [lɜːk]

  1. Таиться43%
  2. Мерцать42%
  3. Подслушивать15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3🥰2

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC245 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

She was ___ off guard by his question. — Его вопрос застал её врасплох.

  1. caught64%
  2. held14%
  3. put13%
  4. found9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC247 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Bruise [bruːz]

  1. Синяк69%
  2. Шрам11%
  3. Заноза20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTC255 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Meticulous [məˈtɪkjələs]

  1. Скрупулёзный69%
  2. Медлительный14%
  3. Расчётливый17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3👍3🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC279 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Spoil [spɔɪl]

  1. Испортить61%
  2. Расколоть6%
  3. Разлить33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6👍4👏1

31 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC271 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Kerb [kɜːb]

  1. Бордюр61%
  2. Обочина28%
  3. Тротуар11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5👍3🥰1

31 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC265 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

The painkillers should ___ in within half an hour. — Обезболивающее должно подействовать в течение получаса.

  1. kick25%
  2. set23%
  3. take29%
  4. come22%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4👍3🔥3

29 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC346 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Stubborn [ˈstʌbən]

  1. Упрямый66%
  2. Ворчливый11%
  3. Замкнутый11%
  4. Вспыльчивый11%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤩6👍3

29 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈1,270 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Draught [drɑːft]

  1. Сквозняк26%
  2. Плесень11%
  3. Духота37%
  4. Сырость27%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥7👍2

29 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC303 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

I can't quite ___ my finger on what's wrong. — Не могу точно понять, что именно не так.

  1. put55%
  2. place8%
  3. lay15%
  4. set23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥6👍2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @englishProt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 81 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz101 voters

He ___ the blame for the whole team. — Он взял вину на себя за всю команду.

  1. shouldered31%
  2. armed7%
  3. handed46%
  4. backed17%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz106 voters

Lurk [lɜːk]

  1. Таиться43%
  2. Мерцать42%
  3. Подслушивать15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz99 voters

Cumbersome [ˈkʌmbəsəm]

  1. Громоздкий58%
  2. Ветхий22%
  3. Шаткий20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz132 voters

Meticulous [məˈtɪkjələs]

  1. Скрупулёзный69%
  2. Медлительный14%
  3. Расчётливый17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz123 voters

She was ___ off guard by his question. — Его вопрос застал её врасплох.

  1. caught64%
  2. held14%
  3. put13%
  4. found9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 05:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz129 voters

Bruise [bruːz]

  1. Синяк69%
  2. Шрам11%
  3. Заноза20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VeryEnglish ☕️ | Очень по-английски
@veryenglink · 57,368
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
English Academy🎓 | Академия Английского языка
@english_academys · 29,633
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Английский язык
@clowar · 34,538
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
Черчилль: Английский с гарантией результата
@immersion_club · 75,446
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Изучаем английский онлайн
@learn_repeat_check · 30,131
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 7 September 2026
5 слов на английском
@anglyskyi_yazyk · 83,650
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
Английский в картинках
@anglysky_yazyki · 58,159
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Английский с нуля
@anglyski_yazik_plus · 30,412
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FriEnglish ☀️| Английские викторины” (@englishProt), 13,523 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishProt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.