Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TEST.

Channel

TEST.

@english_test_6

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25,521subscribers

-203 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002537035437
TypeChannel
Username@english_test_6
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/english_test_6

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,01928,66726,8437 August 2026 — 25,724 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,593 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,518 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,426 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,278 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,212 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,019 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,409 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,429 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,291 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,172 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,242 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,739 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,765 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,153 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,608 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,430 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,444 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,504 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,364 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,667 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,559 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,302 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,029 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,841 subscribers3 September 2026 — 27,564 subscribers5 September 2026 — 27,180 subscribers9 September 2026 — 26,568 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,355 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,052 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,778 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,521 subscribers25,5217 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,472–29,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:5625,521-257
15 Sept 2026, 08:4125,778-274
13 Sept 2026, 14:3826,052-303
11 Sept 2026, 17:2126,355-213
9 Sept 2026, 00:5726,568-612
5 Sept 2026, 14:5727,180-384
3 Sept 2026, 14:4027,564-277
2 Sept 2026, 10:3327,841-188
1 Sept 2026, 13:3728,029-273
31 Aug 2026, 13:5528,302-257
30 Aug 2026, 16:2228,559-108
29 Aug 2026, 19:3828,667+2,303
28 Aug 2026, 16:1226,364-140
27 Aug 2026, 13:5726,504+60
26 Aug 2026, 17:2226,444+14
25 Aug 2026, 13:5826,430-178
24 Aug 2026, 16:5626,608-545
22 Aug 2026, 22:3627,153-612
21 Aug 2026, 13:2827,765+2,026
20 Aug 2026, 16:2525,739first reading

Engagement

170 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.48%
avg views ÷ 25,521 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,420
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.791%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 170 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 40 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held170 (27 July 20264 September 2026)
Views total142,797
Reactions total1,010
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,222 reactions across 110 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,13335.2%
🔥38011.8%
❤‍🔥1795.56%
👍1735.37%
🎉1544.78%
🤣1374.25%
👏1253.88%
1203.72%
🗿1093.38%
😎1013.13%
😁852.64%
🐳772.39%
🥰662.05%
🆒611.89%
🤔401.24%
🍓331.02%
😭331.02%
💯280.869%
😇220.683%
🕊200.621%
22 further kinds1464.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC154 viewsread 4 September 2026
Photo

❓ I ___ my phone! I can't find it anywhere. A) have lost B) lost C) had lost Toʻgʻri javobni toptizmi?

Signed Zokirjon

3 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,120 views24 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

PUNCTUATION😍 Ochishga ochdingiz endi reaksiya bosib keting👇😅❤️💘😍 @English_test_6

10😇5🐳3🤔2👍1🔥1🫡1😎1

3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC437 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Qaysi davlatga 100% grant orqali ketishni xohlaysiz ? 💯

Signed Salih

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC≈4,820 views70 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Tenses Ochishga ochdingiz endi reaksiya bosib keting👇😅❤️💘😍 @English_test_6

44😁10🐳4🔥4❤‍🔥3👏3👍1😇1

2 Sept 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 3 September 2026

❗️Ehtimoliy savollarni kormastan imtihonga aslo kirmang 😱

2 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,940 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

👀 13-15 Sentyabr Multilevel imtihonida tushishi mumkin bo'lgan savollarni aynan yopiq kanalimizga joylab qo'ydik✅ 1-SMENA SAVOLLARI 💯😮 1-SMENA SAVOLLARI 💯😮 Har kunlik bepul darslarimiz orqali B2 va C1 sertifikatini osongina oling ‼️ Ehtimoliy savollarni kormastan imtihonga aslo kirmang 😱

3

Signed Zokirjon

2 Sept 2026, 08:57 UTC155 viewsread 2 September 2026

13-15-Sentabr oylarida Tushish ehtimoli yuqori bo'lgan savollar joylandi 👇 Exam Mock Questions Exam Mock Questions

1 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈3,500 views28 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Type of Sentences Ochishga ochdingiz endi reaksiya bosib keting👇😅❤️💘😍 @English_test_6

17😁5👍2🥰2🏆1🤝1

1 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,760 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026

😁😆😁 🇺🇸 C1 C2 vocabulary 📈📌 🇺🇸 C1 C2 vocabulary 📈📌 🇺🇸 C1 C2 vocabulary 📈📌 🇺🇸 C1 C2 vocabulary 📈📌 ✅Ingliz tilini osonroq organing 😎

1

Signed Zokirjon

1 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,760 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

TASK 2 dan 8.5 olishga nima qilish kerak😁 https://t.me/+7Aut65X5EwhhY2My https://t.me/+7Aut65X5EwhhY2My https://t.me/+7Aut65X5EwhhY2My

2🔥2

Signed Zokirjon

Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @english_test_6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,040 voters approx.

The negotiations continued ___ intense pressure from the opposition

  1. during33%
  2. under34%
  3. despite25%
  4. behind8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz997 voters

We walked ___ the river for almost an hour

  1. into22%
  2. along55%
  3. behind14%
  4. below9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz947 voters

The children ran ___ the tunnel to reach the other side

  1. through45%
  2. over31%
  3. along16%
  4. toward8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,030 voters approx.

The museum is closed ___ publiv holidays

  1. at20%
  2. on53%
  3. in17%
  4. by11%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTCAnonymous Quiz849 voters

By next October, Jill ____ (to receive) her drivers's license.

  1. Will be received26%
  2. Is going to receive28%
  3. Will receive24%
  4. Will have received22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz752 voters

If Mike_ time he ___ more teaching Polish in addition to his main work.

  1. Would have / could earn28%
  2. Had had / could earn26%
  3. Had / could earn29%
  4. Had / would can earn17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TEST.” (@english_test_6), 25,521 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/english_test_6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.