Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,803–10,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:17
10,819
-21
16 Sept 2026, 13:36
10,840
+4
14 Sept 2026, 15:37
10,836
+14
12 Sept 2026, 23:57
10,822
-5
11 Sept 2026, 03:56
10,827
-8
8 Sept 2026, 02:41
10,835
-20
5 Sept 2026, 00:18
10,855
-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:34
10,864
-7
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
10,871
-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:58
10,877
-4
31 Aug 2026, 03:46
10,881
-6
30 Aug 2026, 05:49
10,887
-3
29 Aug 2026, 06:44
10,890
-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:43
10,891
-8
27 Aug 2026, 03:38
10,899
-11
26 Aug 2026, 04:03
10,910
-7
25 Aug 2026, 05:02
10,917
+1
22 Aug 2026, 09:53
10,916
-3
20 Aug 2026, 22:55
10,919
-2
19 Aug 2026, 19:47
10,921
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.42%
avg views ÷ 10,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
911
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
29 (14 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
6,375
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 19:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,958 reactions across 27 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,793
91.6%
👍
143
7.30%
🔥
22
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,958 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.90%
2 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
456
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,130
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFFvF7Ds
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2W5zFJR2g6V
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🤩Гоу знакомиться
🇺🇸 Я - Света, преподаватель английского языка для взрослых B1-C1 и, если бы у саморазвития было рекламное лицо, думаю, им была бы я.
Уже 5 лет я помогаю тем, кто хочет освоить английский или поддержать уже имеющийся уровень. И тут я делюсь полезняшками, которые могут пригодиться и вам:
🤍NATIVE-LIKE SPEECH - файл с тем, что сделает ваш английский живым
🤍AI промпты для изучения и преподавания англ
🤍…
Как перевести предложение 🤔
Этот хлеб уже зачерствел, поэтому нам стоит купить свежую буханку к ужину.
• Носители не переводят "стал твердым" дословно, а используют устойчивый шаблон to go stale (зачерстветь). Поскольку хлеб испортился только что и это важно сейчас, берём время Present Perfect - This bread has gone stale.
• В живой речи носители почти всегда соединяют причину и следствие союзом "so". Если хотите б…
Английский язык забывается быстрее, чем кажется 😨
B2 скатывается до A2 за полгода простоя. Один час английского в неделю — и вы будете всегда в тонусе.
Разговорная онлайн-группа в «Фабрике Английского» стартует 7 сентября! Запишитесь и поддерживайте свой уровень без постоянной зубрёжки 😎
#реклама
О рекламодателе
Фразы-конструкторы, которые делают речь намного легче! 🤓
📚 Иногда знаешь нужные слова, но не понимаешь, как собрать из них нормальное предложение. В таких случаях очень выручают готовые конструкции, делюсь:
• I’d like to – я бы хотел
• I want to – я хочу
• As far as I know – насколько я знаю
• I need to – мне нужно
• I’m planning to – я планирую
• I’d rather – я бы предпочёл
• It depends on – всё зависит от
• The t…
Коллеги, а ваш собственный английский растет вместе с преподавательским опытом?
Мы каждый день работаем с языком: ведем уроки, объясняем грамматику, подбираем материалы. Но преподавать английский и целенаправленно развивать свой язык - все-таки не одно и то же.
Иногда мы замечаем, что давно не чувствуем прогресса. Хочется говорить точнее и свободнее, активнее использовать лексику, больше читать или наконец заняться…
Давно хочется больше говорить на английском? Тогда у меня кое-что есть!
Привет! Я Арина, преподаватель английского. Запускаю Speaking Club для девушек уровня B1–C1 — уютное пространство, где можно говорить на английском про жизнь, тренды, отношения, работу и всё, что нас волнует.
Хочу, чтобы после каждой встречи было ощущение: «Было интересно, я много говорила и узнала что-то новое»
К каждой встрече я готовлю ауте…
Как перевести предложение 🤔
Мне просто любопытно, почему ты вдруг передумал насчёт этой поездки.
• Наше "Мне любопытно" никогда не переводится дословно (To me is curious), носители используют устойчивую фразу "I'm just curious...". В качестве альтернативы для смягчения тона можно взять "I was just wondering..." или "Out of curiosity..."
• Слово "почему" переводим как "why", но так как это косвенный вопрос, порядок…
❓Очень часто мои ученики, особенно на границе между А2 и B1 спрашивают, что им
лучше смотреть и
слушать ❓
И тут есть свои сложности, поскольку фильмы и некоторые подкасты, еще могут быть сложноваты для восприятия, а какие-то банальные ролики для Elementary - уже скучно!
На днях составляла подборку каналов с видео и подкастами, которые подойдут как раз для Pre-Intermediate / Intermediate
Ловите рекомендацию от Лены…
Грамматические конструкции, которые звучат естественно 😌
• I’m used to – я привык
• How about? – как насчёт?
• I’d rather – я бы предпочёл
• Can’t help (doing) – не могу не
• It’s not worth – это не стоит...
• As far as I know – насколько я знаю
• I’m about to – вот-вот собираюсь
• I’m supposed to – мне положено
• I’d better – мне бы лучше…
• I have no idea – понятия не имею
❤️ - если было полезно
Как перевести предложение 🤔
Не хочу придираться, но в последнее время ты довольно небрежно убираешь кухню.
• "Не хочу придираться" лучше переводить готовым блоком "I don't mean to be picky" - я не хочу показаться придирчивым.
• После этого естественно ставим but - но. Получается такая фразочка: I don't mean to be picky, but...
• "В последнее время ты убираешь" передаем через you've been doing - Present Perfect Co…
Как перевести предложение 🤔
Тебе идёт это платье!
• Скажете fits - похвалите размер, а не вид. Да, если хотите сделать комплимент, то можете сказать "It fits you". Но fit - только про размер: сЕло, не жмёт, твой размер, и всё. "Идёт, к лицу" - это suit: This dress suits you (это платье тебе идёт). А "сочетается" с сумкой или туфлями - match.
• This hat suits you.
• These jeans don't fit me.
• Does this scarf match…
❤82🔥4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @englishlb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Английский на завтрак” (@englishlb), 10,819 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/englishlb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.