Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for washimwelichestwom

Channel

washimwelichestwom

@ennnfer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

488subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001740142640
TypeChannel
Username@ennnfer
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ennnfer

Growth

4704884797 August 2026 — 470 subscribers8 August 2026 — 470 subscribers14 August 2026 — 473 subscribers21 August 2026 — 477 subscribers5 September 2026 — 488 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 467–491 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 17:16488+11
21 Aug 2026, 10:37477+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:07473+3
8 Aug 2026, 04:46470no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:10470first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52423207608983452714624.7%
custom 52446306630296105393921.0%
custom 52404877590507280113518.8%
custom 52423427769007048762915.6%
custom 52422335730622376492111.3%
custom 5426928299345472849158.06%
custom 524005864027824541210.538%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC101 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sleepshrimp1Photo

Сегодня мой ДР так что можете меня поздравить репостнув мои порисульки

custom 524223357306223764921custom 52404877590507280114custom 52446306630296105394

5 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC171 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sleepshrimp1Photo

#часодеи маленькая Лисса )

custom 524232076089834527122custom 52404877590507280116custom 52446306630296105391

5 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC178 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я напоминаю, что я рисую на заказ, кто-то спрашивал об этом, но так и не написал мне в лс((( Прайс-лист в ответном сообщении, буду рада вашим предложениям

custom 524232076089834527115

4 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC198 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все-таки, я не могу молчать. Надеялась, что по фд пойдет флэшмоб репостов ЭТОГО, но так никто и не решился... Я сама обманулась этим "художником", который мало того, что использует ии, так прогоняет через него чужие арты. Меня пугает тенденция к популярности этого в фд, я уже видела и эдиты, и всееее с использованием этих "артов" "Художник" сама не скрывает использование ии, пишет что после этого идет ручная дорабо

custom 524234277690070487620custom 52404877590507280116custom 54269282993454728496

4 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC178 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @chasodei_cf

Предлогаю всем художницам фд проинформировать свою аудиторию, по поводу этой ии-художницы ( https://t.me/chasodei_cf/6204 ). Просто половина её аудитории даже не знают, что она создаёт свои "арты" путём прогона чужих рисунков через ии #тейк@chasodei_cf | отправить тейк

custom 52423207608983452719

4 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC151 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rolak1Photo

А мы вообще-то делали коллаб с Корликс... откладывали дорисовку сто лет Нортон и Лисса молодые🌷

custom 524463066302961053931custom 52423427769007048762custom 54269282993454728492

3 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC191 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#арты А вот и отдельно мой арт для "сломанного планшета" @tesslixx Было интересно принять участие

custom 524048775905072801119custom 52423427769007048767custom 52446306630296105393

3 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC130 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tesslixxPhoto

итоги сломанного телефона :3 участники: 1) @tesslixx 2) @vvcxion 3) @poteraskachas 4) @lidiias_days 5) Aug_tisha (pint) 6) @aiivaart 7) @ksudory 8) @mylvofcon 9) @Lycorus_field 10) @incomprehensible_genius 11) @taill0 12) @ennnfer 13) @Lana_cookies 14) @fromthefarstar подписывайтесь на девочек, они крутые ♡ хочу ещё раз сказать всем спасибо!! со многими я познакомилась поближе. всё прошло гладко, все ответственные.

custom 54269282993454728497custom 52400586402782454121

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ennnfer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“washimwelichestwom” (@ennnfer), 488 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ennnfer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.