Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,996–8,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 12:49
8,180
+76
2 Nov 2026, 18:16
8,104
-16
30 Oct 2026, 16:16
8,120
+73
27 Oct 2026, 12:14
8,047
+235
24 Oct 2026, 03:37
7,812
+287
21 Oct 2026, 02:21
7,525
-16
18 Oct 2026, 06:48
7,541
-12
15 Oct 2026, 12:10
7,553
-30
12 Oct 2026, 15:14
7,583
-185
5 Oct 2026, 17:36
7,768
-164
28 Sept 2026, 14:02
7,932
+159
19 Sept 2026, 00:35
7,773
+257
14 Sept 2026, 12:37
7,516
+63
10 Sept 2026, 22:19
7,453
+153
6 Sept 2026, 07:15
7,300
+394
1 Sept 2026, 14:36
6,906
+7
29 Aug 2026, 14:24
6,899
+167
26 Aug 2026, 21:18
6,732
+27
24 Aug 2026, 06:46
6,705
-87
20 Aug 2026, 19:27
6,792
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.1%
avg views ÷ 8,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,060
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
44 (26 June 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
54,520
Reactions total
1,801
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 11:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
213
Videos
7
Links
64
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,653 reactions across 44 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
5,360
61.9%
⚡
1,416
16.4%
🙏
864
9.98%
custom 5193019789085254354
656
7.58%
custom 5352791382790514205
357
4.13%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5,054
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 44 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
585
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enter_ragnarok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Уже неделя, как я в Японии.
Однажды уже был здесь - и вернулся, чтобы вновь включить режим бродяги на полную мощность.
Шагаю по улицам Токио, жадно впитывая в себя атмосферу.
Демонстрирую приемы с тренировочным мечом, выкрикивая фразы из аниме.
Штурмую Акихабару, словно демон безудержного шопинга.
Играю с выдрами, исполняя давнюю мечту (ибо выдры - высшие существа).
Медитирую и расслабляюсь в горячих источниках под …
Фундаментальный материал про то, что называют "личной силой".
Что такое личная сила на самом деле.
Откуда она берется.
И как её тренировать.
Все это, подробно и детально, как больше нигде - здесь.
😎
Препятствия на твоём пути - существуют не для того, чтобы тебя остановить.
Но для того, чтобы научить тебя их сокрушать, обходить и взламывать.
Или вовсе подчинять их своей воле - используя их так, как никто бы больше не додумался.
Касаемо данной инициативы - где я в течение некоторого времени отвечал на вопросы людей.
Из года в год, это демонстрирует один и тот же простой факт:
Люди - не умеют задавать вопросы.
Абсолютно.
Большинство - не понимают сами, о чем именно спрашивают.
И зачем.
Настолько, что ничего, кроме "42", как в классике - на это не ответить.
Задавать правильные вопросы - нужно учиться.
Потому что именно вопросы, которые ты з…
Там, где ты застрял в своих собственных ограничениях.
Ты можешь ждать.
Ты можешь терпеть.
Ты можешь страдать.
Долго и бессмысленно.
Или - можешь разрубить все, что сковывает и сдерживает, страшит и ранит тебя.
Лишь за мгновение проявленной решимости.
Это кажется тебе невозможным.
Что ж - это действительно невозможно.
Но только до тех пор, пока этому не научишься.
Сегодня - мы начинаем учиться этому.
С тобой или б…
Проект BANKAI.
Стартуем уже в ближайшие дни.
Подробности - здесь.
Существует меч - способный разрубить цепи, которыми ты скован.
Я научу тебя владеть им и использовать его.
Чтобы обрести такую внутреннюю свободу - какой ты еще никогда не испытывал.
Наблюдая за тем, в каком ужасе люди начали отписываться от канала за крайние дни - могу сказать лишь одно:
"Бегите, глупцы!".
Бегите от того, что может сделать вас сильнее, мудрее и свободнее.
Бегите и не оглядывайтесь.
Здесь - нужны лишь те, кто остаются.
И выжимают максимум из всего, что здесь было, есть и будет дальше.
Для тех, кто остаётся - пояснение по поводу того, "что это было".
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @enter_ragnarok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ragnarøk” (@enter_ragnarok), 8,180 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enter_ragnarok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
