Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЕНТРЕПРЕНЕРИ | Жорж Піонов

Channel

ЕНТРЕПРЕНЕРИ | Жорж Піонов

@entreprenery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

206subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001924163665
TypeChannel
Username@entreprenery
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/entreprenery

Growth

206207206.56 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 207 subscribers22 August 2026 — 206 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 206–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 15:07206-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:47207no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:32207first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

282 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11440.4%
custom 54452849809786213874315.2%
custom 54249724700231040894114.5%
custom 52066070813349068203010.6%
custom 53979167573336546392910.3%
196.74%
custom 538676691915401604741.42%
👎20.709%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2024 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @entreprenery. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 September 2024 to 20 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Mar 2026, 11:14 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Яка проблема номер один зараз у вас в управлінні ? Що більш за все турбує ? Будь ласка напишіть у коментарі

custom 52066070813349068203

23 Oct 2024, 08:33 UTC587 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"The only way to do great work is to love what you do" – Steve Jobs ❓ «Єдиний спосіб зробити круту річ - це любити те, що ти робиш» - Стів Джобс Доброго ранку! Вивчаємо Англійську та мотивуємось Ентрепрненери!

6custom 54452849809786213876custom 53979167573336546391custom 54249724700231040891

21 Oct 2024, 16:22 UTC595 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кожні півроку ми в компанії проводимо оцінку та зворотний зв'язок співробітникам. Цілий тиждень говорили з колегами про те, що їх мотивує, де брати енергію, що у них виходить краще та розбиралися чому це так? Мої поради: 👣Перевірте, чи по дорозі вам? То чим займається співробітник його вмикає? Це одне з джерел енергії! 🦾Опишіть чого вдалося досягти за звітний період. Чим можете похвалитися і які були труднощі. 🔬Пройд

👍13custom 54452849809786213873👎1custom 52066070813349068201

7 Oct 2024, 07:47 UTC398 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving." Albert Einstein ❓ "Життя схоже на їзду на велосипеді. Щоб зберегти рівновагу, ви повинні постійно рухатися" Альберт Ейнштейн Доброго ранку Ентрепренери! Вивчаємо Англійську та мотивуємось

👍10custom 54452849809786213875custom 53979167573336546393

5 Oct 2024, 14:54 UTC410 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

90% ентрепренерів не досягають успіху! Найчастіша причина - це припинення спроб. Левова частина успіху це дисципліновано йти вперед і не здаватися. 🍗 Полковник Гарланд Сандерс: Його рецепт смаженої курки був відхилений 1,009 разів, перш ніж він заснував KFC 📖 Джоан Роулінг: Її рукопис "Гаррі Поттер і філософський камінь" був відхилений 12 видавництвами перед тим, як його прийняли. 🎬 Уолт Дісней: Перед тим, як отрима

custom 544528498097862138710custom 53979167573336546392custom 54249724700231040892👍1

5 Oct 2024, 08:34 UTC272 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts" Winston Churchill ❓ "Успіх не є остаточним, невдача не є фатальною: важливою є мужність продовжувати" Вінстон Черчилль Доброго ранку! Вивчаємо Англійську та мотивуємось

custom 54452849809786213878custom 52066070813349068203

4 Oct 2024, 20:48 UTC259 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Справа в тому, що погані рішення приймають розумні люди, тому що часто потрапляють у когнітивні пастки. Їх дуже багато і тому ми не контролюємо і не дуже можемо вплинути на них. А розумні люди ще частіше можуть у них попадати і в результаті на виході погане рішення

custom 54249724700231040896👍2

4 Oct 2024, 19:20 UTC264 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тупість часто в розум грає, Її рішення — мов сонце сяє. Реально дивовижний парадокс - коли нам розповідають красиву історію, наш мозок буде шукати факти, які її підтверджують. Замість пошуку даних, які могли б спростувати запропоновану історію, ми насамперед звертаємо увагу на інформацію, яка її підтверджує. Психологічний механізм, який штовхає нас у цю пастку, має знайому назву: підтверджувальне упередження. Ось

👍11custom 53979167573336546396

2 Oct 2024, 16:11 UTC257 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Люди, які працюють без сенсу, та й цілі бізнеси - це реалії нашого світу. Щось я часто бачу людей, які працюють, не розуміючи навіщо. Типо я працюю за гроші, все інше брехня. А найчастіше запитання - як же мотивувати людей? Справа в тому, що люди охочіше підтримують тих, хто ставить акценти на тому, чому вони це роблять. Це стосується клієнтів, співробітників, підрядників і навіть інвесторів Вважаю, що ентрепрене

custom 542497247002310408917👍4custom 52066070813349068203👎1

2 Oct 2024, 06:31 UTC246 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"People don't buy what you do - they buy why you do it!" Simon Sinek ❓ «Люди купують не те, що ви робите - вони купують те, чому ви це робите!» Саймон Сінек Доброго ранку! Вивчаємо Англійську та мотивуємось

8👍4

27 Sept 2024, 16:01 UTC330 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзі! Дякую вам за поради та зворотний зв'язок. Прошу й надалі бути максимально відкритими та прямими в моєму блозі. 🔍Зізнаюсь чесно, що ще шукаю свій тон та манеру письма. Ті, хто знає мене в житті, поки що не впізнають мене в моїх постах. Давайте домовимося: якщо вам дуже сподобався мій пост — ставте 🔥➕🚀 Якщо пост просто нормальний чи ніякий — не ставте нічого або 👍👎 А якщо лайно - то 💩 Як я люблю говорити Call

custom 539791675733365463914👍9

26 Sept 2024, 17:40 UTC302 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

У якому вигляді Вам краше заходить контент❓

  1. ✍️ Текст67%
  2. 📷 Відео «кружок»36%
  3. 🎙Аудіо повідомлення12%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @entreprenery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Sept 2024, 17:40 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

У якому вигляді Вам краше заходить контент❓

  1. ✍️ Текст67%
  2. 📷 Відео «кружок»36%
  3. 🎙Аудіо повідомлення12%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Sept 2024, 20:13 UTCAnonymous Poll81 voters

Кому цікаво можу розповісти як ми проводимо weekly meeting?

  1. Давай 👍94%
  2. Та ну нафік👎0%
  3. Що це таке?🙀6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2024 to 20 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЕНТРЕПРЕНЕРИ | Жорж Піонов” (@entreprenery), 206 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/entreprenery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.