Там на WB опять "Псиоников" почти бесплатно продают 🙈
🔥9👍6❤4

Channel
@eo_reellin_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,657subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001792586392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eo_reellin_official |
| Created | 18 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eo_reellin_official |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 1,657 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 1,661 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 1,663 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 1,667 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 1,670 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 1,671 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 1,674 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 1,680 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 1,678 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,684 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,684 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
482 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 110 | 22.8% | |
| 🤣 | 93 | 19.3% | |
| 🎉 | 84 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 13.7% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 9.96% | |
| 🤩 | 29 | 6.02% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 3.94% | |
| 🤗 | 16 | 3.32% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.207% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Там на WB опять "Псиоников" почти бесплатно продают 🙈
🔥9👍6❤4
Не могу не поделиться этой прелестью. Чтобы укрепить стенки, уже ушло 250 тонн металла, если что.
🤯6😱4
🎥Если бы про яму на Горском снимали фильм-катастрофу, то как бы он выглядел показал новосибирский видеомейкер Илья Натворил
🔥14🙈5
Сегодня шестой день мигрени. Надеюсь, последний, но это не факт. Съедаю ибупрофен и вытаскиваю себя на велопрогулку: этим летом поняла, что река - моё место силы. Странно, что забыла, ведь я выросла на Оби. Сейчас осознала, насколько мне её не хватало.
❤35🤗4
#минутка_йумора Подтверждаю лично! Протеиновый коктейль даже вафли испортит 🙈 Тема открыто на канале не поднималась, но человек я в вечном состоянии похудения, уже потерявший больше трети массы. Но не ради сантиметров, а ради отказывающих по очереди суставов: надо им, бедным, облегчить задачу.
🔥27🤗12😁10❤3
Эффект «Буба — Кики» Вам будет забавно, честно. Долгое время считалось, что связь между звучанием слова и его смыслом случайная. Но в 1929 году психолог Вольфганг Кёлер (а позже в 2001 году исследователи Рамачандран и Хаббард) доказал обратное. Если показать людям две фигуры — одну с острыми углами, а другую с плавными изгибами — и попросить угадать, кого из них зовут «Буба», а кого «Кики», более 95% людей разного …
🔥35🤔1
Вообще мы собирались на Алтай, но испугались проблем с бензином. Потому поехали в то же место третий раз подряд, в сельскую местность нашей области. Как обычно, четырехдневный отдых вышел насыщенным. Кошка, кстати, окотилась. Несмотря на попытки управляющего базой посадить её с котятами в багажник, мы привезли домой только воспоминания (а вот 15 лет назад привезли с Чемала Рысю).
🤩29👍16❤1
#минутка_йумора сай-фай
🤣48🔥7😁6😍1
#минутка_йумора велосипедистского
🤣45👍14🔥4😁3
Надеюсь, это будет вкусно 😋 UPD Действительно вкусно. Только не успело пропитаться 😁
👍30🔥14🎉10❤5
Это как нельзя лучше описывает прошедший год. Тем не менее боль практически не пугает, сладить с хаосом пока не получается, так что я пытаюсь принять его как норму жизни. С днём рождения меня 🎂 Тортик, если будет, будет ппшным, но пока я не приняла окончательное решение его готовить 😁
🎉74
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @eo_reellin_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Женя Ео Live️ || Антинаучная фантастика” (@eo_reellin_official), 1,657 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eo_reellin_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.