Channel
@epenb0benn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002369596471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @epenb0benn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/epenb0benn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 262 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:46 | 259 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 264 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 261 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 257 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 259 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 51.6% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5359351554493141021 | 12 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5348382568796424026 | 8 | 6.56% | |
| custom 5224652025651807549 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| custom 5350719911473743938 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5298542015946985358 | 2 | 1.64% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.64% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.82% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
на кого делать косплей снова как нибудь потом
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
привет скучали?
💋13❤1
летит прямиком к солнцу
❤5custom 52246520256518075491
с прошедшим димасика #димапобрацкий
❤17custom 52246520256518075494custom 53483825687964240263❤🔥1💘1custom 53507199114737439381
ХАХАХВХА
кто будет со мной общаться на постоянной основе
custom 53483825687964240265❤2custom 52985420159469853582custom 53593515544931410212
➖🌝🌝🌝➖ 🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝 от: дровосека(дровосекса) Тема: Санрио! Ваша задача — нарисовать моих ос в образах персонажей из санрио, персонажа для образа вы можете выбрать самостоятельно! Призы: 1 место — 666руб + два полноценный арта от меня +пиар (закреп вашего тгк на 2 дня) 2 место — 300 руб + один полноценный арт от меня 3 место — 111 руб + арт без рендера 4 место — 67 руб + скетч ‼️ Для участия нужно: • Репост этого поста…
❤5🔥1custom 53593515544931410211
и еще можете в качестве подарка скинуть мани 🌟 2200701017233518 тбанк
🔥4❤2💋1😁1custom 53593515544931410211
пасепи за поздравления 🤩
❤10🍓1custom 53593515544931410211
ее у меня ден ражден репостните если любите меня 🥳
❤20custom 53593515544931410217❤🔥4custom 53507199114737439383🍓1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @epenb0benn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
на кого делать косплей снова как нибудь потом
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“free hugs (лохмати рисует)” (@epenb0benn), 262 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epenb0benn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.