Channel
@epilog2022
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,785subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001566286092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @epilog2022 |
| Created | 17 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/epilog2022 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 1,785 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:03 | 1,781 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 1,784 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 1,778 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 1,777 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 1,771 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 1,766 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,780 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 1,784 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,783 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,784 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 1,784 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
753 reactions across 26 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 320 | 42.5% | |
| 💯 | 193 | 25.6% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 19.4% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 11.0% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 1.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 753 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обожаю такие истории, когда 60+ мауру самок писдят за русский язык или за то, что выходят храмы УПЦ защищать. Будто котёнок мягкими лапками по спине прошёлся. 🇺🇦Пока сын воюет, его мать во Львовской области избили и высадили из автобуса за… русский язык Военнослужащий ВСУ рассказал, что мать ехала из Польши в Украину, но в автобусе на женщину напали и подбили глаз за русскую речь. Приехавшая полиция стала на сторон…
😁20
Вот допустим будут выборы в Усраине. И выберёт чубатое стадо Залужного или Фёдорова. И когда новый легитимный перзидент недогосударства выебет их покруче Зельца, они будут писать на заборах "Володя вернись"? Бгггг. Кста, при Порошенке, пмсм у хохлов был шанс сохраниться, а теперь фсё, просрали хохлы Крыголама
💯27🔥2
Хаджибей, Николаев, Ильичевск, все порты хохлов на Чёрном море, всегда были крупными транзитными хабами наркотиков в Европу. Поэтому геропейцы должны в жопу целовать Армию России за перекрытие такого канала поставок дури. Это вам не рыбацкие лодки мочить, как пиндосы в ЛатАмерике делают. Один сухогруз с "пшеницей" хуяк, и полтонны кокса как ни бывало. Но европейцы добра не ценят🤷♂
💯26🔥1
Пиндосы и гейропейцы уникальные долбоёбы конечно. А ведь их предупреждали, не связывайтесь с хозлами. Бггг. Почему я не упомянул бриташек, надеюсь понятно. Замечу, Израиль активно продаёт свою технологию защиты аэропортов от дронов, а гейропейцы активно покупают. Бгггг. Не исключаю вариант, что авиасообщение в Гейропе ляжет, после пары-тройки сбитых пассажирских самолёт писюнами украинской сборки. 5000 уже там, в Гей…
🔥13💯5
Вопрос этически-моральный. Может ли настоящий коммунист/ка отбеливать себе анус, когда коровы не доены, картоха не растёт, а олигархи угнетают рабочий класс?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
😁15
Офтопну. Долбоёбы в РосГосСМИ даже не удосужились проверит про кого сказал Трамп о наказании за утечку о нехватке ракет в Пиндоссии. Он говорил о сотрудниках минобороны, а все понесли о СМИ. Если бы это было для пропаганды, я бы понял, но это от хохлизма в федеральных СМИ.
💯20🔥2
Когда то давно, во времена СССР, читал французскую переводную книжку о американской мафии. Там довольно интересно было про Лаки Лучано, Дженовезе, Бакси Сигела, Лепске Бухгалтера, Альберте Анастазиа, корпорацию убийств(это реально существовавшее подразделение Коза Ностра), в общем много любопытного. Почему решил написать немного? Там была интересная тема, когда мафию начал чистить прокурор Дьюи, слегка психанувшие ру…
💯27🔥19👍1
Будет ли оскорблением назвать тупым идиотом человека не знающего когда началась Вторая Мировая Война?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥5
Честно признаюсь, я думал что у Трампа есть железные тестикулы, ошибся. Не, Донни конечно не такой дебил как пишут про него, но яйцы у него не железные, нет. Бггг
😁14🔥3
Зельц так много ссал на Трампа, что Донни скоро будет пить мочу "пидораса-клоуна на работе клоунов-пидорасов", бгггг
😁16🔥2
Сука, один из хохлоканалов сетки Легитимного выдал охренительно умную мыслю. России нужен мирный договор, определяющий все нюансы, от отмены санкций до репараций Усраины России. Усраине нужно перемирие, чтобы подготовится к новому этапу удохления усьроиньцев. Это не Капитан, это блядь Маршал Очевидность. Бгггг. Точно там Подоляка или Царёв ведёт канал. Бгггг
😁32💯11
Любопытно, что вчера я подумал о массовой дезинформации от укров, что дескать суднА в порты сраинские не идут. Мысля не приходит одному) кстати, наверняка ущерб хохлы преувеличат сегодня, типа "не стреляйте маскали, усё у нас сломали". Ну как в Клопомор было, полные подвалы зерна, а сдохнет, но не признается. А не врал бы, глядишь и оставили бы на пожрать и посев
💯12😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @epilog2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос этически-моральный. Может ли настоящий коммунист/ка отбеливать себе анус, когда коровы не доены, картоха не растёт, а олигархи угнетают рабочий класс?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Будет ли оскорблением назвать тупым идиотом человека не знающего когда началась Вторая Мировая Война?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто больший пиздобол? (хрен вам а не хачипури в ответах)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трость Фрасибула” (@epilog2022), 1,785 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epilog2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.