Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 35 days, net +19,064. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,402–56,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Sept 2026, 22:22
53,330
+365
18 Sept 2026, 19:59
52,965
+86
16 Sept 2026, 14:18
52,879
-148
14 Sept 2026, 20:36
53,027
+489
13 Sept 2026, 04:16
52,538
+837
11 Sept 2026, 08:19
51,701
+3,668
8 Sept 2026, 15:38
48,033
+6,570
5 Sept 2026, 05:40
41,463
+971
3 Sept 2026, 08:58
40,492
+756
1 Sept 2026, 22:54
39,736
+287
1 Sept 2026, 00:43
39,449
+416
31 Aug 2026, 02:34
39,033
+664
30 Aug 2026, 03:27
38,369
+678
29 Aug 2026, 06:35
37,691
+627
28 Aug 2026, 04:05
37,064
+369
27 Aug 2026, 03:18
36,695
+606
26 Aug 2026, 05:18
36,089
+425
25 Aug 2026, 05:22
35,664
+858
24 Aug 2026, 02:03
34,806
+158
22 Aug 2026, 10:13
34,648
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 53,330 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,900
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
62 (29 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
622,560
Reactions total
85,804
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 19:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
42
Videos
5
Links
11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
220,890 reactions across 61 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47,543
21.5%
👍
44,819
20.3%
🥰
42,671
19.3%
❤🔥
42,354
19.2%
😍
42,268
19.1%
👎
803
0.364%
😢
144
0.065%
💔
134
0.061%
😱
88
0.04%
🤯
66
0.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220,890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
STAKE YOUR EPS
BUILD YOUR STAKING POWER
Don’t just hold EPS. Put your EPS to work.
Stake today. Build your position. Prepare for tomorrow.
STAKE • HOLD • BUILD • GROW
Be part of the next chapter of the EPS ecosystem.
Your staking journey starts with one decision: START.
BIGGEST PROFIT. BIGGER VISION. LONG-TERM MINDSET.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
EPSILON FAMILY — IMPORTANT
Who already staked 100 EPS early?
If you paid the 5% liquidity fee when EPS was around $2–$3, and the current price is around $10, your EPS holdings are now worth more in dollar terms than when you originally staked.
I strongly believe in the Epsilon project, and $100 is the future target I’m watching.
Stay active • Keep staking • Hold your EPS • Watch the next move
I🇪🇸 Hello Epsilon Family,
My name is Alejandro Martín, I’m from Spain, and I have 9 years of experience in crypto trading.
From my personal market view, I’m watching EPS closely and see $45–$50 as a possible range.
Withdrawal and Deposit System Update
The withdrawal Deposit system is currently under development for the next 7 hours to improve withdrawal smoothness and security.
Please hold your EPS during this 7-hour development period.
After 7 hours, please check the official system and proceed with your withdrawal according to the latest instructions.
HOLD EPS • STAY CALM • SECURITY FIRST
Withdrawal System Update
The withdrawal system is currently under development for the next 12 hours to improve withdrawal smoothness and security.
Please hold your EPS during this 12-hour development period.
After 12 hours, please check the official system and proceed with your withdrawal according to the latest instructions.
HOLD EPS • STAY CALM • SECURITY FIRST
FAMILY - URGENT & IMPORTANT NOTE
Don't sell your EPS. Hold your EPS.
EPS is moving forward, and $50 is the target we are looking toward. Stay strong and stay focused.
Faster to faster - stake your EPS before the price increases.
Who has already staked — in my honest opinion, you are the lucky ones.
EPSILON FAMILY — STAY STRONG
Don’t stop mining. Be strong, stay focused, and don’t listen to negativity.
Work hard. Keep mining. Keep your genuine referrals active.
Activate your staking and check your daily earning schedule.
Do the math and understand your potential earnings.
You may never have seen a project like Epsilon before.
Keep building now — everyone will see the difference very soon.
KEEP MINING • KEEP…
EPSILON COMMUNITY — ONE USER, ONE ACCOUNT
To keep Epsilon fair, transparent, and trusted, please follow this important rule:
ONE MOBILE NUMBER → ONE EPSILON MINING ACCOUNT 🛡
Do not create or operate multiple Epsilon mining accounts using multiple Telegram accounts on the same mobile/device.
Multiple or duplicate accounts may be treated as ineligible and removed according to Epsilon’s official rules, including ass…
STAKE BEFORE 72H
Have 100+ EPS? Activate your staking before the 72-hour window ends.
Activate Your Staking → Stay Active → Build Your EPS
For any staking issue, contact support:
Telegram: @Epsilonsupportx
EPSILON FAMILY — STAY STRONG. STAY ACTIVE. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
👍1,530❤1,490🥰1,420😍1,380❤🔥1,330👎57😢10💔9
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @epsiloncryptox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Epsilon Community” (@epsiloncryptox), 53,330 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epsiloncryptox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.