25 measurements spanning 26 days, net +451. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,851–13,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 16:27
13,370
+56
31 Aug 2026, 18:55
13,314
+32
30 Aug 2026, 21:15
13,282
+10
30 Aug 2026, 00:28
13,272
+73
29 Aug 2026, 00:25
13,199
+46
28 Aug 2026, 00:13
13,153
+74
26 Aug 2026, 22:53
13,079
+48
25 Aug 2026, 23:56
13,031
+14
24 Aug 2026, 22:46
13,017
+36
23 Aug 2026, 07:18
12,981
+8
21 Aug 2026, 16:36
12,973
+5
20 Aug 2026, 13:22
12,968
+8
19 Aug 2026, 14:58
12,960
+10
18 Aug 2026, 18:22
12,950
+6
17 Aug 2026, 17:06
12,944
+2
16 Aug 2026, 08:16
12,942
+3
14 Aug 2026, 17:45
12,939
+11
13 Aug 2026, 08:08
12,928
+3
12 Aug 2026, 07:24
12,925
-6
11 Aug 2026, 06:33
12,931
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 13,370 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,030
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.313%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
15 (4 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
75,470
Reactions total
236
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
978
Videos
4
Links
79
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
236 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
150
63.6%
👏
32
13.6%
👍
16
6.78%
👎
16
6.78%
🍌
7
2.97%
💩
7
2.97%
😁
3
1.27%
🤡
3
1.27%
🖕
2
0.847%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A New Chapter, A New Identity: Unveiling Our New Institutional Logo Soon!
Following a period of comprehensive transformation, Ethiopian Public Service University (EPSU) is proudly stepping into a brand new era. Aligned with this dynamic journey, EPSU is excited to announce the arrival of its new institutional logo, a refined visual identity designed to reflect our vision, mission, and core values.
This new emblem s…
Dr. Waqgari Negeri, chairperson of the EPSU Alumni Organizing Committee, on his part, welcomed the participants and highlighted that the university is currently undertaking various reform initiatives and becoming an increasingly preferred institution. He explained the ongoing efforts to establish a major alumni association capable of creating an international impact, noting that the founding process is nearing comple…
EPSU Welcomes Class of 2006 for 20-Year Reunion, Unveils Alumni Association Vision
Addis Ababa – 23 August 2026
The Ethiopian Public Service University (EPSU) hosted a memorable 20-year reunion for its Class of 2006 on August 23, 2026, at Hidase Hall.
During the commemorative session, Dr. Dereje Teklemariam, Director of International Collaboration and Partnerships, announced the formalization of the EPSU Alumni As…
Congratulations!
Our university’s Class of 2006 Alumni Chapter will celebrate the landmark 20th anniversary of its graduation on Sunday, August 23, 2026.
We extend our heartfelt congratulations to all members of the Class of 2006 on reaching this extraordinary milestone. Your enduring excellence serves as a vital cornerstone for the growth and unity of our broader Alumni Association.
EPSU Holds Postgraduates Programs External Curricula Validation Workshop
Ethiopian Public Service University held Postgraduate Programs External Curricula Validation Workshop on August 5, 2026. University faculty, external reviewers, experts, and other key stakeholders participated in the workshop.
In his opening remarks, Dr. Amanuel Kussia , Vice President for Academic Affairs, welcomed the participants and said, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @epsutelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 650,300 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GAT Exam (Graduate Admission Test) for MSc & PhD Students @GATExamAAU · 62,002 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
GAT (Graduate Admission Test) Exam @GATExams · 36,949 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ethiopian Public Service University” (@epsutelegram), 13,370 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/epsutelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
