Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for astrolg1 - Submundo do Crime.

Channel

astrolg1 - Submundo do Crime.

@equipeastro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,358subscribers

+859 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002493208902
TypeChannel
Username@equipeastro
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/equipeastro

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,49813,35812,9287 August 2026 — 12,499 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,499 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,498 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,512 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,581 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,639 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,672 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,710 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,761 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,823 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,888 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,921 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,963 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,977 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,979 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,992 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,007 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,024 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,033 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,039 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,053 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,054 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,058 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,061 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,056 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,054 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,051 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,056 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,097 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,101 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,140 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,146 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,177 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,252 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,358 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 49 days, net +859. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,369–13,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 02:0013,358+106
19 Sept 2026, 04:1613,252+75
16 Sept 2026, 22:0113,177+31
15 Sept 2026, 00:1813,146+6
13 Sept 2026, 06:2113,140+39
11 Sept 2026, 06:5613,101+4
8 Sept 2026, 09:5813,097+41
5 Sept 2026, 05:0213,056+5
3 Sept 2026, 09:0513,051-3
1 Sept 2026, 23:1613,054-2
1 Sept 2026, 02:1913,056-5
31 Aug 2026, 04:2313,061+3
30 Aug 2026, 07:5313,058+4
29 Aug 2026, 10:3313,054+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:3413,053+14
27 Aug 2026, 12:3413,039+10
26 Aug 2026, 10:2413,029-4
25 Aug 2026, 11:0213,033+9
24 Aug 2026, 07:4813,024+17
22 Aug 2026, 15:0713,007first reading

Engagement

387 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.82%
avg views ÷ 13,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.408%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 387 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held387 (6 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total119,119
Reactions total444
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 98 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,865 reactions across 351 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉37920.3%
❤27314.6%
🤣19310.3%
🕊1799.60%
👌1658.85%
🔥1447.72%
👏784.18%
🤬754.02%
💩452.41%
🍌392.09%
🖕361.93%
👍331.77%
😢231.23%
🫡231.23%
🤡211.13%
😁201.07%
👎191.02%
👀130.697%
👻130.697%
🤮130.697%
19 further kinds814.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 357 of the 387 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC95 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥🚩☯️ Traficantes do PCC executaram hoje um integrante do Comando Vermelho em Pontes e Lacerda (CV), no Mato Grosso.

😁3

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC125 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✨💥 A Polícia Civil e Militar realizaram hoje uma operação no Espírito Santo com o objetivo de combater uma organização criminosa dedicada ao tráfico interestadual de entorpecentes e à lavagem de capitais. As investigações apontaram que empresas formalmente constituídas estariam sendo utilizadas para conferir aparência de licitude aos recursos provenientes do tráfico de drogas.

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC630 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥🇮🇱🚩 Traficantes do Sindicato do Crime executaram ontem um integrante do Comando Vermelho em Serra do Mel (SDC), no Rio Grande do Norte.

👌4🕊2🤬2

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTC618 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @astromg1Photo

📍 Fatima, Sabara Trocou tiro ate o final. Ontem o vulgo Pombo foi assassinado por militares do GER, o mesmo era um alvo prioritario da policia pois ja havia passagens por resistência, trafico e ate homicidio, o mesmo era oriundo do Complexo do Fatima, em Sabara mas tambem traficava no Goiania e tambem teve passagens pelo Poca Oi, no extremo norte de Belo Horizonte. O mesmo havia trocado tiro com militares no Goian…

🔥2❤1🕊1

Signed Lealdade

2 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC637 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @astromg1Photo

📍 Jardim Alvorada x São Jose Frente de Boca é executado pelo TCP do São Jose. Nesta noite de Terça, o vulgo Fael ou Nego, foi executado na Rua Flor de Maio, dentro do Complexo Jardim Alvorada por bandidos ligados ao TCP do São Jose, favela ao lado e em teoria aliada, o motivo seria uma desavença antiga entre as duas quadrilhas que hoje estão sob a bandeira de facções aliadas mas no passado quando eram gangues locai…

🔥2❤1🕊1🥰1

Signed Lealdade

2 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC796 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚩☯️ Traficantes do Comando Vermelho executaram um integrante do PCC em Paranaiba, Mato Grosso do Sul. 💥 O homem é conhecido como “Arthur”.

❤3🕊2

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC857 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍿 CANAIS ➕️ FILMES ➕️ SÉRIES 🍿 Assista tudo em um só lugar! 📺 Canais Ao Vivo | 🏆 Futebol | ✅ Netflix | 🎬 Filmes e Séries | ⭐ Star+ | 🥊 Combate | 🏀 NBA | 🧿 Animes e muito mais! 👉 Ativação rápida e suporte imediato! 📌 https://w.app/t3st3_grat1s

🖕1

Signed FOCO NEWS

2 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC938 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥 Uma das lideranças antigas da facção Bala na Cara, conhecida como “Tonatto”, foi encontrado morto em sua cela no instituto penal de charqueadas. Tonatto foi preso em 2010.

🕊1

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC946 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥 Um traficante do PCC foi morto por um criminosos em Três Lagoas (PCC), no Mato Grosso do Sul, outras quatros pessoas foram baleadas.

❤1🕊1

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC984 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥 Uma mulher conhecida como “Marilei Pereira”, foi morta por criminosos em Maracaju, no Mato Grosso do Sul. Marilei e mãe do traficante “Tiu”, membro do PCC que foi preso mês passado por atirar contra traficantes do Comando Vermelho na cidade. 🏳️ O marido de Marilei estava levando o filho na escola no momento do ataque.

🤬4❤1👍1🕊1

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC972 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💥 Durante patrulhamento no bairro Nossa Senhora de Fátima (TCP), em Sabará (MG), policiais militares foram recebidos a tiros. Um policial foi baleado, mas não corre risco de vida. Um criminoso também foi baleado no ombro e está em estado grave.

❤2🎉1

Signed Abençoado 21

2 Sept 2026, 13:33 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✨💥 O frente do TCP em Itararé (TCP), em Vitória, foi preso pela Polícia Civil.

🎉2

Signed Abençoado 21

Showing the 12 most recent of 387 posts we hold for @equipeastro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTCAnonymous Poll394 voters

Quem é o candidato que terá seu voto?

  1. Lula23%
  2. Augusto Cury28%
  3. Flávio bolsonaro29%
  4. Renan Santos17%
  5. Ronaldo Caiado2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 387 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“astrolg1 - Submundo do Crime.” (@equipeastro), 13,358 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/equipeastro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.