Channel
@equium_russia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,074subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681066045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @equium_russia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/equium_russia |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 9,074 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 9,078 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 9,084 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:45 | 9,088 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 9,089 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 9,080 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 9,087 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 9,081 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 9,075 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 9,079 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 9,082 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 9,084 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 9,083 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
235 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 101 | 43.0% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 20.9% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 18.3% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 12.3% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.55% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.851% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.426% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что делать, когда привычные стратегии больше не работают, а бизнес каждый день подкидывает новые вызовы? В новом выпуске подкаста говорим с Филиппом Гузенюком — стратегическим консультантом, коучем первых лиц и топ-команд крупных компаний, автором книги «Счастье в деятельности». Обсудили: — почему люди выгорают не от количества дел, а от их бессмысленности; — как перейти из постоянной борьбы в состояние игры; — что…
🔥6👍2
Posted without readable text
🔥6❤3👍1
«Ты ничего великого не сделаешь один» © #эквиум #бизнессообщество
💯9❤3🔥2
«Продумали цель, общество и экономику, но забыли о… » © Владимир Седов, основатель компании «Аскона» и города Доброград, разбирает историю одного микрополиса, где при создании среды для людей допустили один серьёзный просчёт. В отчётах его не видно, а последствия вскрываются лишь через поколение, когда всё уже построено. Об ошибке, которая возможна в любом сообществе, компании и даже целом городе – смотрите в виде…
🔥5👍2❤1
Posted without readable text
👏4🔥3❤1
Средняя продолжительность жизни — 78 лет. Среднему зрителю этого видео — 38. На что предпринимателю потратить оставшееся время? Оскар Хартманн, бизнес-ангел и сооснователь бизнес-сообщества «Эквиум», называет самую недооценённую причину неудач, которую люди осознают слишком поздно.
💯9🔥4👍1🕊1
Posted without readable text
👍5🔥3❤1
«Поехали!» или как меценатство построило триумф отечественной науки. Ниже — путь длиной в 50 лет, уложенный в 4 шага, чтобы увидеть ценность сегодняшних решений на длинной дистанции. Шаг №1. Меценатский жест. В 1909 году предприниматель Христофор Леденцов учреждает первый в России меценатский фонд «Общество содействия успехам опытных наук и их практических применений». Фонд финансировал открытия, изобретения и их …
🔥11
«Надо делать это традицией!» © Резиденты «Эквиум» Москва, вместе со своими детьми и вторыми половинками выбрались на сплав по одной из крупнейших водных артерий Европы – реке Дон. Рыбалка, баня, раки, заплывы на сапах, арт-медитация, песни под гитару и такое редкое в наше время состояние безмятежности. 🎥В ролике – больше, чем просто совместный отдых. Это напоминание для всех предпринимателей о том, как важно иног…
🔥10❤7👏2🎉1
В чём состоит ваша предпринимательская амбиция? Максим Ноготков, основатель брендов «Связной» и Pandora Russia, а также арт-парка «Никола Ленивец», в разговоре с сооснователем «Эквиум» Оскаром Хартманном называет свой magnum opus — проект жизни, который выходит за пределы материальных ценностей. История о масштабе мышления и поиске среды нового типа, где бизнес становится всего лишь инструментом достижения цели.
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍8🔥8🤩3
Пока бизнес небольшой, собственник держит все под личным контролем. Но когда компания растет, становится очевидно: дальше масштабируется не количество вашего времени, а система управления. Онлайн-чаптер бизнес-сообщества «Эквиум» организует вебинар на тему: «План построения Офиса Собственника — Холдинга». Сергей Чабаненко, предприниматель и эксперт по построению управленческих систем. За 19 лет в управлении Сергей…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @equium_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@equium_russia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЭКВИУМ | БИЗНЕС-СООБЩЕСТВО” (@equium_russia), 9,074 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/equium_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.