قبل خواب این موزیکو گوش کنیم @erfanandroid

Channel
**Brooz**
@erfanandroid
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
52,550subscribers
-1,633 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001004915998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @erfanandroid |
| Description | قدیمی ترین کانال نرم افزاری تلگرام از ابان 1394 تنها راه ارتباطی: @aloerfan |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/erfanandroid |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 52,550 | -31 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 52,581 | -29 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 52,610 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 52,622 | -20 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 52,642 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:30 | 52,654 | -18 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 52,672 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 52,687 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 52,688 | -8 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 52,696 | -40 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 52,736 | -42 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 52,778 | -108 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 52,886 | -263 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 53,149 | -29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 53,178 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 53,214 | -43 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 53,257 | -57 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 53,314 | -68 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 53,382 | -58 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 53,440 | first reading |
Engagement
341 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.1%
- avg views ÷ 52,550 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,380
- 119 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 119
- of 341 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 341 (1 August 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 759,276 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 21:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,700
- Videos
- ≈457
- Links
- ≈8,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 03s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
انس جهانی به زیر 4000 سقوط کرد @erfanandroid
با کیفیت ترین سرور ممکن موجود در ایران رو تمامی اپراتورها به صورت اتصال تضمینی فقط فقط گیگی 12 هزار تومن حجم بالا بخرید گیگی 12 درمیاد سرور v2 و nv با ساب پرسرعت بدون ضریب ای پی ثابت مخصوص ترید و اینستا و یوتوب رو همه اپراتورها همه دستگاه ها چندکاربره 20 گیگ 600 تومن 1 ماهه 40 گیگ 800 تومن 1 ماهه( این سرویس درمیاد گیگی 20 تومن) 60 گیگ 1 ماهه 1 تومن 100 گیگ 2 ماهه 1/500 ( گیگی 15 هزار تومن) 150 گیگ 2 ماهه 1/850(گیگ…
ایرانسل تست شده vless://[email protected]:443?security=reality&encryption=none&pbk=wpZDT_592emHu309qN-7-qceofbMJzoAdIx9m9RFJGg&headerType=none&fp=safari&type=tcp&flow=xtls-rprx-vision&sni=de.stream-node6.com&sid=98753667b2406829#%40erfanandroid ss://YWVzLTI1Ni1nY206WlJwZ2FCZUd4dEVOSVhndmhwa1pCS3o5R25XUlMyZFljeDlPK2EyaXdOND0@202.50.253.18:19999#%40meliproxyy ss://YWVzLTI1Ni1nY206WlJ…
ایرانسل https://t.me/proxy?server=web-kook.mosbatbashim.info.&port=5500&secret=DDBighLLvXrFGRMCBVJdFQ https://t.me/proxy?server=88.198.148.89&port=443&secret=YyEEgYdJXfrFmgMCIMJdjjRueWVrdGFuZXQA https://t.me/proxy?server=91.107.160.196&port=443&secret=3XnnAQIAAQAH8AMDhuJMOt0 https://t.me/proxy?server=shoes.golgoli2.co.uk&port=2096&secret=eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=88.198.148.89&port=443&sec…
هر گیگ اینترنت یک ماهه: ۲۸ هزار تومان! @erfanandroid
اینترنت بی کیفیت با گرانی بیشتر! اینترنت رو ۴۰٪ گرون میکنید، اون هم چند ماه بعد از گرونی قبلی؛ در ازای این گرونی، دقیقاً چه خدماتی اضافه شده؟ کدوم کیفیتی بهبود پیدا کرده؟ سرعت اینترنت بهتر شده؟ محدودیتها کمتر شده؟ وقتی کیفیت و سرعت اینترنت اینقدر افتضاحه، افزایش قیمت بر چه اساسی توجیه میشه؟ الان با این گرونیا تفریح یه جوون غیر از اینترنت چیه؟! چرا اینقدر فشار رو بیشتر و بیشتر میکنیم بدون بهبود کیفیت؟! آدم نمید…
شبتون بخیر @erfanandroid
طرف پیام داده اگه پارسال 207 خریده بودیم باید کلی خرج بنزین و روغن و مصرفیاش میکردیم ینی تو مغز یه عده جا مغز،عنبر نساء هستش حاضره هرروز اوارگی بکشه با اسنپ و پیاده بره بیاد از چیزی که میخره استفاده نکنه لذت نبره بخاطر اینکه پول استهلاکشو نده پول میده یه تیکه فلز بندازه گوشه خونه هرروز بره ببینه قیمتش چقد شده اینا همون احمق هایی هستن که کلی زمین بهشون ارث رسیده نمیفروشن بزنن به یه زخمی میزارن واسه وارث گرونتر شه اونم…
طلا مقاومت 26200 رو شکوند و به سمت 29-31 در حرکته این سینگال خرید یا فروش نیست @erfanandroid
https://t.me/proxy?server=great.cipservice.co.uk&port=2096&secret=eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=silver.ciaude.co.uk&port=2096&secret=eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=panir.begir.co.uk&port=8443&secret=EERighJJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=good.cipservice.co.uk&port=2083&secret=eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ https://t.me/proxy?server=hadaf.golgoli2.co.uk&port=2053&secret=eeNEg…
سرور خوب بخرید
Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @erfanandroid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تو کدوم بازار سرمایه گزاری کردین؟
- طلا و دلار27%
- ملک و زمین6%
- ماشین و دیگر وسایل5%
- با کدوم پول چی میگی حاجی68%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@erfanandroid named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 6 posts, 18 August 2026 – 22 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“**Brooz**” (@erfanandroid), 52,550 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/erfanandroid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.