Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Профессор Ершов А.В.

Channel

Профессор Ершов А.В.

@ershovlabexpert

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,881subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261016209
TypeChannel
Username@ershovlabexpert
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ershovlabexpert

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,88120,03419,957.56 August 2026 — 20,031 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,031 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,034 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,033 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,034 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,033 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,025 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,014 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,010 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,003 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,999 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,001 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,991 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,982 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,977 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,964 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,953 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,946 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,934 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,926 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,928 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,926 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,924 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,916 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,914 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,908 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,893 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,897 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,896 subscribers18 September 2026 — 19,881 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,858–20,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:5919,881-15
15 Sept 2026, 22:1919,896-1
14 Sept 2026, 02:3719,897+4
12 Sept 2026, 10:3819,893-15
10 Sept 2026, 08:4119,908-6
7 Sept 2026, 02:5719,914-2
4 Sept 2026, 12:1519,916-8
2 Sept 2026, 23:3619,924-2
1 Sept 2026, 22:0719,926-2
31 Aug 2026, 19:1619,928+2
30 Aug 2026, 17:4819,926-8
29 Aug 2026, 18:5819,934-10
28 Aug 2026, 19:4319,944-2
26 Aug 2026, 20:3419,946-7
25 Aug 2026, 22:5819,953-11
25 Aug 2026, 00:5719,964-13
23 Aug 2026, 10:3519,977-5
22 Aug 2026, 00:3819,982-9
20 Aug 2026, 17:4219,991-10
19 Aug 2026, 16:3520,001first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.48%
avg views ÷ 19,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held80 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total35,692
Reactions total865
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 14m
Average length
2m 58s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,716 reactions across 78 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
87232.1%
👍58521.5%
🔥48617.9%
😁1525.60%
😱1003.68%
🤣893.28%
💯732.69%
🙏692.54%
🤯391.44%
❤‍🔥371.36%
🙈351.29%
🤔331.22%
🤗301.10%
👏220.81%
180.663%
🙉160.589%
🏆120.442%
😘120.442%
🥰110.405%
👀80.295%
5 further kinds170.626%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,716 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:44 UTC546 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

12👍12🔥6

2 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC706 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🦠 Самое правильное время для вакцинации — это конец августа и максимум начало сентября. Почему именно эти сроки? Вашему организму нужно время. Иммунитет к вирусу не появляется в день укола - на формирование полноценной защиты уходит несколько недель. Если сделать прививку прямо сейчас, к моменту начала осенней эпидемии гриппа Ваша иммунная система будет полностью готова. Если же тянуть до глубокой осени и ставить в

8👍6🔥3😘1

1 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,410 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @BFMnewsVideo

Трагедия у храма Святых Жён-Мироносиц в Москве. Один из прихожан начал вести себя неадекватно и стал бросаться на людей. После того как на место приехала скорая, он напал на медиков. Из многочисленных публикаций СМИ следует, что от ударов лопатой сильно пострадала фельдшер. По некоторым данным, девушку госпитализировали в реанимацию в крайне тяжёлом состоянии. Нападавшим же оказался 29-летний прихожанин этого же хра

😱315🤯5💔1🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,420 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

у меня вопрос только один - почему ТРОЕ медиков просто одновременно не остановили это безумие? Да, согласен, не положено, так уходите и не присутствуйте при этой "разборке", а если уже стоите рядом - так не доводите до абсурда ситуацию Возвращаюсь всегда к подобным ситуациям - нападение на медиков при исполнении должно иметь совершенно иные последствия... ВИДЕО трагедии ниже очень жаль

💯12👍2🤔21🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,270 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как не болеть и победить длительный сухой кашель? Читаем: https://ershovlabexpert.ru/medicalblog/zatyazhnoy-kashel

👍7🔥4🤗43🙏2

1 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,260 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

23👍13❤‍🔥11🙏2

1 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,240 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁16🤣11💯5

31 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,340 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥129👍7

31 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,320 views27 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

12👍10🤗5

30 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,240 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁6🙈5😱4🤔2

30 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,450 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как поддержать ребенка в ОГЭ / ЕГЭ / сессия и прочее Кажется, что сейчас самое время... Начинать нужно уже прямо сейчас: 1. Должны быть скорректированы самые распространенные дефициты (перечень анализов и возможность БЕСПЛАТНОЙ коррекции в ссылке): https://t.me/ershovlabexpert/181 2. Улучшение энергетических процессов, выработки медиаторов в нейронах и не только: - Холин стронг* – по 1 капс. перед завтраком и обе

18👍8🔥7

30 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,380 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

совсем скоро начинаем: 30.08.2026 в 10:00 Мск Прямой эфир на моём YouTube-канале Ответы на вопросы https://youtube.com/@ershovlabexpert?si=H7YUUVEUDg19_-A9

👍8😘2👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @ershovlabexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Профессор Ершов А.В.” (@ershovlabexpert), 19,881 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ershovlabexpert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.