Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for โ€ขยฐโ„ฐ๐“ˆ๐“‰โ„ฏ๐’ถ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐“‰๐“โ„ฏยฐโ€ข

Channel

โ€ขยฐโ„ฐ๐“ˆ๐“‰โ„ฏ๐’ถ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐“‰๐“โ„ฏยฐโ€ข

@estea_battle

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

36subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003697059819
TypeChannel
Username@estea_battle
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/estea_battle

Growth

364339.510 August 2026 โ€” 43 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 43 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 42 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 39 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 36 subscribers10 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 35โ€“44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:1836-3
10 Sept 2026, 18:3939-3
25 Aug 2026, 05:1542-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:3143no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:3143first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’˜640.0%
โค533.3%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ213.3%
๐Ÿ“213.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะ”ะฐะฒะฐะนั‚ะต ััŽะดะธ ะฐะบั‚ะธะฒัƒ)

๐Ÿ’˜1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

6 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะฏะบ ะฒะธ?

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

6 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะ’ัั–ะผ ะฟั€ะธะฒั–ั‚ะธะบะธ

๐Ÿ’˜1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะžะผะณ๐Ÿ’“๐Ÿ’“๐Ÿ’“๐Ÿ’“

๐Ÿ’˜1

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

6 ั€ะตะฐะบ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿฅน

๐Ÿ“1

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

2 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

5 ั€ะตะฐะบ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿ’˜

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

30 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026

ะžะผะณ 4 ั€ะตะฐะบ ะฒ ะบะพะฟั–ะปัŒั†ั–๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

29 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะ”ะพะฑั€ะตัะตะฝัŒะบะพ ะทะฐะปะธัˆัƒ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ

๐Ÿ“1

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

29 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะ“ะพัƒ)))))๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ’

โค1๐Ÿ’˜1

Signed ~โ€~Angel girl~โ€~

29 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะกะพั„ั–ั”ะฝัŒะบะฐ, ะณะพัƒ ะทั€ะพะฑะธัˆ?)

โค1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

29 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะฏะบ ะฒะฐัˆั– ัะฟั€ะฐะฒะธ?

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

29 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ะฃัั–ะผ ะฟั€ะธะฒั–ั‚ะธะบะธ

โค1

Signed โœง๐‘ฌ๐’๐’Š๐’›๐’‚๐’ƒ๐’†๐’•๐’‰โœง

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @estea_battle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

ะŸั€ะพะดะฐั‚ะธ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป

  1. ะขะฐะบ๐Ÿ’60%
  2. ะั–๐ŸŒท60%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œโ€ขยฐโ„ฐ๐“ˆ๐“‰โ„ฏ๐’ถ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐“‰๐“โ„ฏยฐโ€ขโ€ (@estea_battle), 36 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estea_battle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.