Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Estúpido Cinema / Failed Cinema

Channel

Estúpido Cinema / Failed Cinema

@estupidocinema

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

493subscribers

+117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003509442601
TypeChannel
Username@estupidocinema
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/estupidocinema

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

376493434.56 August 2026 — 376 subscribers6 August 2026 — 376 subscribers13 August 2026 — 389 subscribers21 August 2026 — 411 subscribers27 August 2026 — 460 subscribers2 September 2026 — 472 subscribers11 September 2026 — 493 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 17:00493+21
2 Sept 2026, 17:23472+12
27 Aug 2026, 06:25460+49
21 Aug 2026, 06:48411+22
13 Aug 2026, 18:17389+13
6 Aug 2026, 20:19376no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:48376first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 19 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣10221.6%
😁9219.5%
💊6213.1%
💅388.05%
🗿347.20%
👏255.30%
😢234.87%
👍224.66%
132.75%
🤓132.75%
🦄102.12%
🌚40.847%
😨40.847%
30.636%
🌭30.636%
👨‍💻30.636%
🔥30.636%
🤮30.636%
🖕20.424%
🤡20.424%
10 further kinds112.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC384 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Alice Subservience (2024). Filme da robô milf interpretada pela atriz que no final dos anos 2000 era musa de Hollywood e foi usada e abusada até ser descartada feito bagaço de laranja, fala sobre uma família normal no futuro próximo em que a esposa precisa de um transplante de coração, e fica a maior parte do tempo internada, pois ela não vive no país do SUS nem tem a fortuna do gordão ex-global. Para cuidar da famí

🤣13🌭3🔥3🤮2

5 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC512 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Dr. House Série que faz o público leigo e os estudantes de medicina babarem feito autistas nível 99 por seu roteiro supostamente genial, fez muito sucesso nos anos 2000 e caralho a quatro. Nela temos House, médico de um importante hospital cujos companheiros de trabalho não descobrem porra nenhuma, deixando o momento estrela para o protagonista desvendar o mistério de cada paciente. O curioso é que as doenças sempre

🤣11👏8

1 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC752 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Menos um filme bosta com lacração. Mesmo que façam mais um Blade com Wesley Snipes e tenha lacrate no roteiro, só a presença do ator fará muita gente ver o filme. @EstupidoCinema

👍17👏4

1 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC846 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Tempo pill de Amy Smart, famosa por Efeito Borboleta (2004) e Adrenalina (2006). @EstupidoCinema

😢10💊4😨4🤯21

31 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,500 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Anunciado próximo filme do Christopher Nolan, a cinebiografia de Barack Obama, primeiro presidente negro dos Estados Unidos, suspeita-se que o diretor não tratará do fato dele ter feito acordo nuclear com o Irã e de peritos de Israel terem comprovado que seus documentos de identidade e certidão de nascimento são falsos. @EstupidoCinema

🤣27😁4🖕2

31 Jul 2026, 01:36 UTC847 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

O tempo pill foi generoso com o Jason Statham. Mas o cara faz exercícios e com certeza uma dieta fabulosa pra ter esse físico aos 59 anos. @EstupidoCinema

🗿21💊6🦄3

30 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,240 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

A normalização do homem ser otário voluntário para vagabunda não é recente. Série: iCarly (2007-2012). @EstupidoCinema

💊17😁8👏1🤮1

29 Jul 2026, 22:46 UTC473 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Julius Rock/ Todo Mundo Odeia o Chris E chegou a vez dele, o maior mangina da galáxia nos anos 80, época em que se passa a série. Julius leva uma vida merda morando em bairro violento cheio de ladrões, trabalha como peão em dois empregos pra bancar Rochelle, a esposa narcisista egoísta que o humilha e trata mal todo dia, o Chris, que começa a série como trombadinha juvenil, o Drew, garoto vagabundo que não faz nada

💊19😁15💅3

29 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC268 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Fox McCloud (StarFox) / Super Mario Galaxy (2026) Pois é o filme do Super Mario Galaxy ficou bem legal na minha opinião. Ficou divertido trouxe novos personagens como o Yoshi, tbm o filho do Koopa. Mas o mais legal do filme é ver a raposa do espaço. Pra quem jogou lá na época do Super Nintendo, pode afirmar que é bemmmm nostálgico. Afinal de contas quem poderia imaginar que os efeitos gráficos iriam evoluir tanto a

👏9👨‍💻3🤓3

29 Jul 2026, 00:54 UTC≈1,420 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Charles Xavier pisando em ovos para não admitir que rejeita a Mística por ela ser baranga, enquanto o Magneto dá uma de São Jorge. Puro Psy ops de Hollywood para iludir homens e mulheres betas de que a aparência não importa ou que tem gente que acha bonito o que é feio. Filme: X-Men Primeira Classe (2011).

😁18💊7🌚4

28 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,120 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Griffith de Berserk (1997). Moço delicadinho com o cabelo branco de poodle fru-fru, comanda o Bando do Falcão, um grupo de mercenários na Europa medieval. Resgata da miséria Caska, uma guerreira mulatinha, e Guts, um órfão. Os três viram grandes amigos, mas quando Guts decide ir embora, Griffith chuta o pau da barraca e faz sesgo proibido com a filha do rei para quem prestava serviços, é capturado e torturado terriv

😁17💅4🦄4🍓1💋1🥴1😍1

26 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC≈1,420 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Único ponto negativo nesse filme é o DeadPool bosta. Esse Dentes de Sabre ficou foda, mas foi jogado fora depois, deveria ser ele o vilão principal em Logan (2017), e não aquele clone genérico do Wolverine que ninguém liga. Filme: X-MEN Origins Wolverine (2009). @EstupidoCinema

🗿113

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @estupidocinema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Estúpido Cinema / Failed Cinema” (@estupidocinema), 493 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/estupidocinema.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.