1 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,420 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Great resource to study AI and different types of AI vulnerabilities https://riskatlas.principle.sg/
❤2
Channel
Daily Security
@ethers_security
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,002subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001699414568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ethers_security |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ethers_security |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 4,002 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 4,006 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 4,009 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 4,012 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 4,013 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 4,018 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 4,019 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 4,022 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 4,028 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 4,030 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
40 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 70.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 15.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
9 Jun 2026, 17:25 UTC930 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Claude Fable is out. As you can see, the new model claims to have been significantly improved. Looking forward to giving it a shot https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5
23 Apr 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,280 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @infinityhedge
PASSWORD MANAGER 'BITWARDEN' CLI WAS COMPROMISED IN A SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACK ⚠️ BITWARDEN CLI 2026.4.0 WAS COMPROMISED AS PART OF THE ONGOING CHECKMARX SUPPLY CHAIN CAMPAIGN AFTER ATTACKERS ABUSED A GITHUB ACTION IN BITWARDEN’S CI/CD PIPELINE: SOCKET - INFINITYHEDGE SOCKET: IF YOU USE BITWARDEN CLI, WE RECOMMEND REVIEWING YOUR CI LOGS AND ROTATING ANY SECRETS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN EXPOSED TO THE COMPROMISED WORKFLOW SEC…
❤1
15 Apr 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Drone Security Cheat Sheet — and the attack surface is bigger than you’d expect. Drones aren’t just flying cameras anymore. They’re networked IoT devices with GPS modules, companion computers, Wi-Fi links, and open ports. That means: GPS spoofing, deauth attacks, firmware tampering, and sensor manipulation are all real threats. The key vulnerable endpoints: • Communication links — unencrypted MAVLink or Wi-Fi traffi…
🥰1
6 Apr 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Interesting story behind Drift Protocol Hack -> On April 1, 2026, the Drift protocol (a DeFi platform on Solana) was exploited in a sophisticated attack that had been planned over six months. -> Starting in Fall 2025, attackers posed as a legitimate quantitative trading firm, meeting Drift contributors in person at multiple crypto conferences across several countries. They built trust through months of genuine-look…
❤1
23 Mar 2026, 22:24 UTC861 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AISecHubPhoto
Meet the Cybersecurity Baron: a specialized LLM fine-tuned for offensive security. This isn't your average chatbot. It's a quantized, 6-bit GGUF model built on Llama 3.1 Instruct, designed to think like a penetration tester. https://huggingface.co/AlicanKiraz0/Cybersecurity-BaronLLM_Offensive_Security_LLM_Q6_K_GGUF
18 Mar 2026, 07:40 UTC828 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
NVIDIA Unveils NemoClaw: The Missing Security Layer for AI Agents OpenClaw exploded out of nowhere in January. An Austrian developer named Peter Steinberger built the first version in about an hour, and within weeks it became one of the fastest-growing open source projects in GitHub history- outpacing Linux's 30-year download record in just three weeks. The PROBLEM with autonomous agents OpenClaw's strength - broa…
❤3👏1
8 Mar 2026, 08:04 UTC982 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo
The AI Skills Explorer is a searchable database of AI skill files- structured prompts in YAML or markdown format-designed specifically for smart contract security auditing. These skills come from top security teams and researchers in the space, giving you battle-tested configurations you can drop directly into your workflow. https://smartcontractshacking.com/tools/ai-skills-explorer Follow for more @ethers_security
👍6❤1🔥1
4 Mar 2026, 11:20 UTC803 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
I would call it a good beginning if you're considering to build a sec tool with AI superpowers Why it is worth a read 🌟 The article presents Amy, a semi-autonomously evolving, freely available open-source specialist smart contract auditor focused on Vault/ERC4626 protocols. While Amy can work with any AI platform, she self-evolved using Claude, which showed the best performance in their testing. What Amy can actual…
❤2🔥2
2 Mar 2026, 19:21 UTC621 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
https://evmresearch.io/index
❤6
26 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC734 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
OpenSourceMalware is a community-driven threat intel platform for tracking malicious packages across npm, PyPI, GitHub & more. Browse verified threats, share findings, and protect your dependencies🔒🤝 👉 https://opensourcemalware.com
❤2
25 Feb 2026, 18:40 UTC613 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
https://www.kali.org/blog/kali-llm-claude-desktop/
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ethers_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 354,435 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Security” (@ethers_security), 4,002 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ethers_security.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.