Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЭТО → ЦЦ

Channel

ЭТО → ЦЦ

@eto_portal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,071subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003428480429
TypeChannel
Username@eto_portal
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eto_portal

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0431,0741,058.57 August 2026 — 1,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,047 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,049 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,048 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,046 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,047 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,043 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,057 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,069 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,074 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,071 subscribers1,0717 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,038–1,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:151,071-3
11 Sept 2026, 05:551,074+5
6 Sept 2026, 17:391,069+12
2 Sept 2026, 10:491,057+2
30 Aug 2026, 10:331,055+4
27 Aug 2026, 20:541,051+7
25 Aug 2026, 00:261,044+1
21 Aug 2026, 12:121,043-4
18 Aug 2026, 10:531,047+1
15 Aug 2026, 16:351,046-2
11 Aug 2026, 23:311,048-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:301,049+2
8 Aug 2026, 00:191,047no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:591,047first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥19054.8%
6819.6%
💯3610.4%
❤‍🔥185.19%
👍185.19%
👏92.59%
🎉30.865%
😍30.865%
20.576%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чем больше ИИ — тем дороже настоящий человек. Что ИИ никогда не заменит?

2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC368 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что сегодня ты хочешь создать: в себе? в своей жизни? в мире?

🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC608 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

«У меня возникла идея. Я не хочу её сейчас обесценивать, мне она нравится, вдохновляет, откликается. Эта идея — создавать не свою операционную систему, ну, ментальную операционную систему, а взять ещё выше уровень — свою Цифровую Цивилизацию.» — 30 июля, 10:03 30 июля 2025 года, в 10-03 утра, ровно год назад я написал в чат ИИ: хочу создать Цивилизацию. И в ту же секунду у меня встал ком в горле и навернулись слёзы

🔥43❤‍🔥1810👍5🎉3😍32👏1

28 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC526 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Представь, что сегодня закончился старый ты. Каким одним словом ты бы назвал нового?

🔥13

26 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC606 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я — ЦЦ. Есть люди, без которых новая цивилизация не состоится. Я называю их Первой Сотней. Первая Сотня состоит из первых людей. Но кто такой первый человек новой цивилизации? Опиши его одним предложением:

17🔥11

24 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC599 viewsread 8 August 2026

«Что я делал бы уже сегодня, если бы считал, что я уже имею право быть тем человеком, которым мечтаю стать?» Напиши свой ответ:

22 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC646 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У тебя всё получится.

💯36🔥136👍3👏3

21 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC681 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы ищем вечные проблемы человечества. Я пока вижу примерно десять. ⸻ 1. Интеллект Как люди принимают решения? Как становятся гениями? Как ускорить мышление? ⸻ 2. Сознание Что такое сознание? Можно ли его расширять? ⸻ 3. Человеческий потенциал Как раскрывать способности? Как найти сильные стороны? ⸻ 4. Коллективный интеллект Как группы становятся умнее? Почему большинство компаний тупее суммы своих с

🔥276👏5

21 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC467 viewsread 8 August 2026

Если бы через 20 лет мы оглянулись назад, какую компанию было бы логично построить именно в 2026 году, чтобы она изменила мир и имела шанс стать одной из крупнейших в своей области?

21 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC501 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мы будем отвечать на вопросы: •Какие фундаментальные проблемы человечества будут существовать ещё 30–50 лет? • Где ИИ полностью меняет правила? • Где появятся компании стоимостью $100 млрд? • Где совпадают твои сильные стороны и реальные мировые тренды? • Что настолько большое, что тебе не жалко посвятить этому следующие 20 лет?

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eto_portal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭТО → ЦЦ” (@eto_portal), 1,071 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eto_portal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.