Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for а это точно пэпэ?

Channel

а это точно пэпэ?

@eto_tochno_pp

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,338subscribers

+1,832 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002730759312
TypeChannel
Username@eto_tochno_pp
DescriptionБлог Беляевой Дарьи о вкусном и здоровом похудении. Здесь вниз ползёт вес, а не настроение. Мои системы питания для снижения веса —> https://t.me/eto_tochno_pepe_bot Менеджер канала: @arina_extraPR Связь с автором: @daria_vladimirovna_b
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eto_tochno_pp

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

4,4216,3385,379.58 August 2026 — 4,506 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,421 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,495 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,489 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,858 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,221 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,539 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,623 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,800 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,781 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,740 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,715 subscribers28 September 2026 — 5,700 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,667 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,990 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,122 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,207 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,301 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,300 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,327 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,334 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,338 subscribers8 August 20263 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 87 days, net +1,832. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,133–6,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 14:176,338+4
31 Oct 2026, 05:486,334+7
28 Oct 2026, 07:276,327+27
25 Oct 2026, 02:546,300-1
21 Oct 2026, 18:206,301+94
18 Oct 2026, 16:476,207+85
15 Oct 2026, 12:446,122+132
12 Oct 2026, 11:545,990+323
5 Oct 2026, 15:405,667-33
28 Sept 2026, 09:155,700-15
15 Sept 2026, 14:185,715-25
12 Sept 2026, 04:005,740-41
8 Sept 2026, 04:015,781-19
3 Sept 2026, 08:535,800+177
30 Aug 2026, 22:575,623+84
27 Aug 2026, 20:045,539+318
24 Aug 2026, 20:455,221+363
21 Aug 2026, 07:134,858+369
18 Aug 2026, 05:414,489-6
14 Aug 2026, 23:264,495first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 6,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held33 (4 August 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total19,230
Reactions total1,036
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 22:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
665
Videos
58
Links
100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 38s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,604 reactions across 32 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤70243.8%
🔥25515.9%
😁22213.8%
👍1006.23%
💯754.68%
😱553.43%
🎃261.62%
👏261.62%
❤‍🔥241.50%
🤣221.37%
🥰221.37%
🤝181.12%
😍150.935%
🙏130.81%
✍120.748%
😭70.436%
💘40.249%
👻30.187%
⚡20.125%
🤩10.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC≈1,030 views45 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @howtobe_extraordinaryPhoto

Сладости или гадости? Показывайте себя красивых в комментариях🦇

🎃26❤14👻3🔥2

28 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,720 views60 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Это просто я, когда готовлю 10й вариант одного и тоже же блюда для нового сборника😁😁😁 Ну зато рецептура в итоге получается самой и-де-аль-ной и вам потом очень вкусно✨

❤39👍15😁6

27 Oct 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,830 views125 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Кажется, идеальное дизайнерское решение для кухни стройнеющих найдено!

😁76💯21🤣20❤8

26 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,760 views22 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Кто уже в том возрасте, когда для счастья достаточно, чтобы ничего не заклинило? Я с вами😁 Причём настолько, что однажды даже в отпуск собиралась с заклинившей шеей, уколами и таблетками, которые практически не помогали. Именно тогда я особенно сильно полюбила одну штуку… Мой DeepRoller! Кто давно со мной, наверняка помнит эту историю. Тогда именно прокатка спины у стены давала мне хоть какое-то облегчение... С тех…

❤12🔥6👍4

25 Oct 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,540 views113 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Давайте так: я вам несу поддерживающее видео от любимой мамаситы, а вы в новую неделю шагаете отдохнувшими и счастливыми людьми. Договорились?🫶🏻

❤70🥰22❤‍🔥14🙏7

24 Oct 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,660 views69 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Если в жирах больше всего калорий, может, ну их нахрен? [в продолжение предыдущего поста] Логика вроде бы понятная: в одном грамме жира 9 ккал, а в белках и углеводах — всего по 4. Убираем жиры, экономим калории, быстрее худеем. Красота! Но есть небольшая проблема: жиры нашему организму жизненно необходимы. И вот зачем: 🟢Чтобы нормально работали гормоны. Жиры и холестерин нужны организму в том числе для производств…

❤50🔥19

24 Oct 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,550 views69 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Выглядит как идеальный завтрак для похудения, согласны? Авокадо, красная рыба, яйца, орехи… Всё то, что фитнес-блогеры обожают показывать в своих видео! И всё это действительно прекрасные продукты. Но предлагаю, как всегда, включить критическое мышление. Допустим, у нас на тарелке: 🥑Половина авокадо (100 г) — ~160 ккал 🐟 Слабосолёный лосось (80 г) — ~160 ккал 🥚 Два яйца — ~150 ккал 🍞 Цельнозерновой хлеб (60 г) — ~…

❤38👍23✍4🔥4

23 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,420 views68 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Кстати, именно такой подходит будет в новом сборнике быстрых рецептов. [как и в остальных, в общем то] Вас уже ждёт феерически вкусная адаптация бургера, который можно есть хоть каждый день. Прекрасный состав, соус как у самого вкусного бургера их ваших воспоминаний и абсолютно легальное для похудения кбжу)) Скажите, кайф?! Он, кстати, был виновником приостановки работы над рецептами аж на 3 дня!!! А все потому, чт…

❤42🔥14😁7😍3⚡2

23 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,430 views68 reactionsread 3 November 2026

А теперь давайте разбираться, что же выбрать на ужин: классическую пасту с песто и пармезаном или старый добрый чизбургер? [конечно, если мы предполагаем, что другого выбора нет] Логично, что многие автоматически выбрали пасту. Всё-таки бургер у нас прочно ассоциируется с фастфудом и чем-то совершенно недопустимым на похудении. Но давайте прикинем состав и посмотрим на цифры. 🟢Паста с песто и пармезаном: 80 г сухих…

❤35🔥22👍11

23 Oct 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,770 views193 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Вы худеете и выбираете ужин. Что возьмёте? ❤️ — скорее пасту 🔥 — скорее бургер ✍🏻 — напишу свой вариант в комментариях

❤101🔥82✍8😁2

22 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,870 views113 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

Пост создан для сохранения на случай, когда кто-то в очередной раз скажет: «вот раньше всё ели и ничего страшного»🙄

😱55❤27👍18😭7🔥3🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @eto_tochno_pp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“а это точно пэпэ?” (@eto_tochno_pp), 6,338 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eto_tochno_pp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.