Вводи промокод LANCE и получи 50.000$ + Premium на 7 дней!
Ютуба - https://youtube.com/@linteyy?si=Uf-GJkkxYZH_Kyzg
Сообщения каналу - https://t.me/etolance228?direct
Сотрудничество/По вопросам/Забрать приз - @kanekiken2288
Created
Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 88 days, net +4,035. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,944–14,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 02:09
13,584
+8
3 Nov 2026, 05:16
13,576
+25
2 Nov 2026, 02:44
13,551
+142
1 Nov 2026, 00:57
13,409
+224
31 Oct 2026, 01:29
13,185
+60
29 Oct 2026, 22:59
13,125
+17
28 Oct 2026, 21:38
13,108
-6
27 Oct 2026, 17:51
13,114
-4
26 Oct 2026, 16:59
13,118
-6
25 Oct 2026, 18:37
13,124
+34
24 Oct 2026, 19:39
13,090
+32
23 Oct 2026, 17:50
13,058
+54
22 Oct 2026, 14:21
13,004
+42
21 Oct 2026, 07:16
12,962
-9
20 Oct 2026, 08:31
12,971
-9
19 Oct 2026, 09:56
12,980
+25
18 Oct 2026, 11:27
12,955
+3
17 Oct 2026, 12:06
12,952
-7
16 Oct 2026, 14:37
12,959
+2
15 Oct 2026, 16:17
12,957
first reading
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 13,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
134 (3 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
62,560
Reactions total
2,102
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 06:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,180
Videos
≈138
Links
≈418
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 53s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,323 reactions across 134 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,248
45.6%
🤡
904
9.70%
🤣
873
9.36%
🔥
754
8.09%
👎
590
6.33%
👍
557
5.97%
custom 5400317893160217392
381
4.09%
custom 5402506303551579918
298
3.20%
custom 5298937724168853193
143
1.53%
😁
142
1.52%
custom 5400350801199637652
121
1.30%
😎
107
1.15%
custom 5460704463327074557
105
1.13%
custom 5402165485011741124
55
0.59%
custom 5460634369460803689
45
0.483%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
168
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 134 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
61
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @etolance228. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 134 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
То что выше отныне неактуально, теперь наказания за эту фразу выдается следующем образом:
1. Если просто такое в ООС чат - ООС травля / оск.
2. Если есть особенность / дефект и делается акцент на этом прямо или завуалировано - выдается наказание как за угнетение
но я честно добавил бы наказание как ООС оск даже если это в айси чате или голосовом, ибо у нас никаких бля акушеров нету и очевидно если игрок такое говор…
и я не шучу, челу сняли наказание что было выдано хелпером, он пошел дальше это писать типами в оос чат)
это очевидно должно наказываться и наказываться серьезней чем просто оскорбление в ООС, но логика такова, что акушерку же оскорбляют а не тебя епта)
если вы пишите игроку в оос чат что он жертва пьяной акушерки - не оскорбление и наказание не получите! вперед и с песней господа!
(посмотрим как быстро пофиксят)
есть еще один тип комментаторов, которые сидят пиздят «ЧЕТА ВЫ ДОХУЯ ТРЕБУЕТЕ ОТ АДМИНОВ С ТАКОЙ ЗП»
да кто ВЫ то блять, я что ли зарплату им плачу? моя задача работать именно с тем что имеется, я не могу ни повысить ни понизить зарплату никому там
вот это «лояльные» к админам ребята, они лояльные вообще нахуй не в ту сторону)
свою лояльность можно проявить путем того, чтобы не писать на админа сразу жалобу писать,…
бля я в ахуе, многие из вас порой такую хуйню порят
«а зачем сразу снимать? можно же просто предупредить блин», а потом эти же предупредители, жалуются по личкам бегают что их откинули за хуйню, ответили как-то не так в репорте и тд
вы видимо не понимаете, что такие абсолютно глупые ошибки и поступки, это именно показатель того что человек не способен вообще на то, чтобы взаимодействовать с игроками
завтра он проц…
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @etolance228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @etolance228 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ето лансе???” (@etolance228), 13,584 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etolance228.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
