Channel
@eugeniaguter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002213293186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eugeniaguter |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eugeniaguter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 138 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 137 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 138 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 137 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 138 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 138 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
80 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 20.0% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 15.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.25% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#quiz "Проверим интуицию". How would you say it in English? Картина была написана красным и белым.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🇬🇧 Как произносится слово gnome?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#test Продолжаем нашу рубрику "Проверим интуицию" 🎲 Друзья, какой вариант звучит правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Одиссея: когда миф становится реальностью 🎬 Сегодня были на фильме «Одиссея». До сих пор под впечатлением. Это не просто фильм — это потрясающее зрелище. Визуально — безупречное. Атмосферно — мощное. Актёрская игра — сильная. Пожалуй, это одна из самых впечатляющих работ Кристофера Нолана. Даже если вы не читали «Одиссею» Гомера, вы всё поймёте и почувствуете масштаб этой истории. Да, это не точная экранизация. Э…
❤2👍2
😀 Сеута, анклав и английский язык новостей: как описывают границы, движение людей и попытки найти лучшую жизнь. 30 июля в испанский enclave (анклав) Сеута — город, расположенный в Африке, который принадлежит Испании — за сутки попали 60 тысяч человек.😱 Они шли из Марокко через забор и колючую проволоку. В новостях это звучит коротко: migrants (мигранты) crossed the border (пересекли границу). Но за этими словами — …
❤2🔥1
🧠 English in Mind #1 📌 True или truly? Один комментарий — и целая мини-тема по английскому. На днях в комментариях под моим постом про the GOAT один подписчик написал: *The real GOAT is Pelé.* Я ответила: *I was expecting someone to mention Pelé. 🔥 A true football legend! 🇧🇷* А потом я подумала: а ведь многие в этом месте могут легко ошибиться и написать truly вместо true. И решила предложить вам проверить инт…
🔥4❤1
Какой вариант правильный?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой вариант звучит правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Друзья, предлагаю ввести рубрику - Проверим интуицию🔥 Что делаем? Выбираем вариант, какой вам кажется оптимально подходит по заданию. Голосование анонимное (свои ответ будете знать только вы) 😉 Не стесняемся и не отсиживаемся! Поехали🚀
❤2
🐐 THE GOAT — комплимент или оскорбление? И почему фанаты спорят об этом до хрипоты Вы наверняка видели под постами Роналду и Месси загадочное слово GOAT или эмодзи козла. 🐐 Да, все знают, что goat — это «козёл». Но когда вы видите не просто goat, а the GOAT, — это уже совсем другая история. Это не про животное, а про аббревиатуру GOAT. Так что же это значит? Давайте разбираться. Что такое GOAT? The GOAT — это абб…
🔥2
Вчера я смотрела финал 🇪🇸🇦🇷 и поймала себя на мысли, что эмоции от большого спорта — это как напоминание: мечты сбываются, если не сдаваться. Мои мысли по этому поводу 👇 Испания — чемпион мира по футболу 2026! Молодцы, ребята! 🇪🇸🏆 За каждой большой победой — тысячи часов тренировок, ошибок, сомнений и моментов, когда хочется всё бросить. Success is the sum of small efforts, repeated day in and day out. «Успех — э…
🔥3🎉2
Сегодня финал ЧМ-2026⚽ Друзья, смотрим, переживаем, болеем. А заодно — разбираем и запоминаем фразы, которыми так часто пользуются англоговорящие комментаторы на трансляциях. Сохраняйте, пригодится в следующий раз, когда будете смотреть футбол в оригинале. У футбольных трансляций — свой язык. Быстрый, живой, со своими выражениями и ритмом. Давайте обратим внимание на самые нужные слова и фразы, чтобы чувствовать с…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eugeniaguter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#quiz "Проверим интуицию". How would you say it in English? Картина была написана красным и белым.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🇬🇧 Как произносится слово gnome?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#test Продолжаем нашу рубрику "Проверим интуицию" 🎲 Друзья, какой вариант звучит правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой вариант правильный?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой вариант звучит правильно?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЕВГЕНИЯ ГУТЕР” (@eugeniaguter), 138 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eugeniaguter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.