Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,242–1,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 16:18
1,248
-2
7 Sept 2026, 06:39
1,250
+3
30 Aug 2026, 18:04
1,247
+4
27 Aug 2026, 07:00
1,243
no change
27 Aug 2026, 06:45
1,243
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
258 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
114
44.2%
😢
71
27.5%
👍
30
11.6%
😭
15
5.81%
🍓
14
5.43%
🥰
7
2.71%
😁
4
1.55%
👏
2
0.775%
🔥
1
0.388%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2023 to 26 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تَعرض حساب المالك للقناة الى الحظر والحذف من منصة التليگرام
ومن المحتمل ان تتعرض القناة بدورها للحظر والحذف
من المؤسف ان ينتهي كل هذا الجهد بهذه البساطة
مع ذلك هذا مصير كل شيء
يومًا ما سينتهي كل شيء
تشرفنا بمعرفتكم
ونتمنى لكم السلامة
«إنا لم نجد دجاجة إلا من بيضة، ولا بيضة إلا من دجاجة، فيجب أن يكون هكذا أبدًا، وهذا يؤذن بقدم العالم»
فيقال ان الدجاجة والبيضة لا تخلو اما ان تكون قديمتين/ازليَّتين او مُحدثتين.
او ان الدجاجة قديمة والبيضة محدثة او العكس، إن كانتا حادثتين فهو المُراد والذي نقول به، وان لم يكونا كذلك فيستحيل ان يكونا قديمين واحداهما من الاخرى في نفس الوقت.
لتوقف وجود الدجاجة على البيضة والبيضة على الدجاجة فينتفي قدم احدهما بالضرورة…
«(لقد صرح القدماء أن الجمال يدرك ولا يوصف).. كما أن الملاحة كذلك.
ولكن يمكن لنا الوقوف على واقع الجمال من خلال إمعان النظر في الأمور الحسية الجميلة.»
-الشيخ جعفر السبحاني | رسالة في التحسين والتقبيح.
«فعلى الرغم من أننا نعيش متوقعين أشياء أفضل، فإننا كثيرًا ما نندم ونتوق إلى استعادة الماضي مجددًا..
إننا ننظر الى الحاضر بصفته شيء يجب تحمله في أثناء استمراره، وعلى أنه ليس إلا طريقًا نحو هدف، ولذلك فإن معظم الناس إذا نظروا إلى الوراء بعد وصولهم إلى نهاية الحياة، يكتشفون أنهم كانوا دومًا يعيشون مؤقتًا..
وسيتفاجئون إذ يكتشفون أن الشيء ذاته الذي تجاهلوه وتركوه يمر دون أن يستمتعوا به، (كان هو الحياة التي قضوا كل أوقات…
❤5👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @exc3rpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
المعرفة القانونية - Legal Knowledge @Legal_Knowledgee · 35,899 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
وزارة التعليم العالي والبحث العلمي @lraq_ed_maktaba · 46,337 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُخْتٰاراتٌ” (@exc3rpt), 1,248 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/exc3rpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.