Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الأستاذ عمار البدراني

Channel

الأستاذ عمار البدراني

@excellence2023

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

993subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001801536072
TypeChannel
Username@excellence2023
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/excellence2023

Growth

9931,000996.52 September 2026 — 998 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,000 subscribers7 September 2026 — 993 subscribers2 September 20267 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 992–1,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 09:17993-7
2 Sept 2026, 19:461,000+2
2 Sept 2026, 13:15998first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.3%
avg views ÷ 993 subscribers
Avg views / post
320
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held18 (24 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total5,766
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14172.7%
👍178.76%
😢73.61%
💔63.09%
😁63.09%
👏42.06%
🔥42.06%
🤔42.06%
21.03%
🥰21.03%
😭10.515%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 12:57 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

مهمات الفصل الثاني ركزوا على الخلايا الثمانية ( الارومة ، الخلية البلازمية ، البدينة ، الدهنية ) العضلات ( القلبية ، الهيكلية ، الملساء ) مقارنة بينهم جدا مهمة الانسجة النباتية ( البرستيمي ، الوعائي ) وانواعهم تعريف الغضروف ، العظم ، النسيج الضام ، خلايا الدبق العصبي ، حبيبات النسل انواع الخلايا العصبية ( احادية القطب وجماعتها ) تعداد الرسومات النسيج العمودي البسيط المكعبي العمودي المطبق الكاذب العظم المصمت وحد

2

31 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC236 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

قبول جوابين في إعراب (كيف) في قول (بهاء الدين زهير) : وهو الحبيب فكيف أصبح قاتلي .... ---- -1- في محل نصب حال + فعل ناقص استوفى خبره -2- في محل نصب خبر للفعل الناقص مقدم وجوبا + فعل ناقص لم يستوف خبره -- ضمن أسئلة اللغة العربية للسادس العلمي (2026 الدور 2)

14

30 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC308 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

رأيي الاسئلة منهجية ، ولو اكو خطأ بسيط بها من عندهم هالشي

10

29 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC318 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

طلاب الدور الثاني وفقكم الله لكل ويا رب نفرح بدرجاتكم ❤️

22👏2🥰2

28 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC351 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @qawarerlibaryPhoto

توفرت ملزمة أسلوب للنفي 2027 للأستاذ عمار البدراني سعر النسخة 3000 دينار فقط ويوجد توصيل للطلب التواصل هنا @bkriraqi

5👍4🔥3

27 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC379 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

القواعد الاستفهام المجموعة الاولى والثالثة مهمين والخصائص والاستفهام المجازي النفي ليس ومشبهاتها ، لم ولما ولن ، لا النافية للجنس ، النفي الضمني بأسلوب الشرط مهم التقديم والتأخير يجي عليه سؤالين واحد ع الخبر وواحد ع المفعول به الخبر ركزوا على من يكون شبه جملة والمبتدأ فيه ضمير يعود ع بعض الخبر وكذلك اذا جا بعده نكرة مخصصة وغير مخصصة المفعول به ركزوا ع اما الشرطية الموجودة واما المحذوفة والضمير المنفصل النداء ركز

9👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @excellence2023. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مُحادثات📮
@H_E_M_O19 · 30,254
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
اختصارات♥️زخرفه♥️اسماء♥️بوت♥️زغرفه
@XO_XC · 35,363
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الأستاذ عمار البدراني” (@excellence2023), 993 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/excellence2023.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.