Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EXPANSIO инсайты

Channel

EXPANSIO инсайты

@expansioclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,693subscribers

-128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537150175
TypeChannel
Username@expansioclub
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/expansioclub

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6936,8216,7577 August 2026 — 6,821 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,821 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,813 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,800 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,795 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,785 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,778 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,759 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,739 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,730 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,717 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,710 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,704 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,693 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,674–6,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:576,693-11
13 Sept 2026, 08:026,704-6
9 Sept 2026, 20:016,710-7
4 Sept 2026, 12:596,717-13
31 Aug 2026, 13:376,730-9
28 Aug 2026, 21:546,739-20
25 Aug 2026, 14:596,759-19
22 Aug 2026, 12:036,778-7
19 Aug 2026, 10:036,785-10
16 Aug 2026, 17:396,795-5
13 Aug 2026, 04:046,800-13
10 Aug 2026, 09:386,813-8
7 Aug 2026, 13:176,821no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:056,821first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3446.6%
2737.0%
👍912.3%
👏22.74%
😱11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @expansioclub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC191 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @riazanov_top100Photo

Когда то, что ты делаешь наполнено смыслом ❤️ Это отзыв от одного участника. Expansio - объективно лучший русскоязычный клуб про международный e-com ❤️

🔥53

18 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC493 views6 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

От товара, который красили на кухне, до топа Amazon Сегодня в Expansio разбираем необычный e-commerce кейс с Гаджи Макулевским. В 2017 году он начинал с handmade-товара без эксклюзивного производства. Первую партию отправил на склад Amazon обычной Почтой России. Дальше собственное производство, 7–8 тысяч изделий в год и топовые позиции в категории «Подарки» на Amazon. Но самое интересное здесь не история роста с

4🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,040 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Оффлайн Expansio в Нижнем Новгороде завершился 💙 Это были теплее три дня, которые хочется вспоминать Новые знакомства, разговоры до глубокой ночи, яхты под дождём, ледяная ванна, прогулки по городу и десятки часов общения с людьми, которые говорят с тобой на одном языке Наверное, лучше всего атмосферу передают сами участники: Я зарядился и перезагрузился. В этой ситуации офлайн стал глотком свежего воздуха Кажды

🔥125

22 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC895 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @riazanov_top100Poll

Только селлеров: ваши мысли/планы теперь?

  1. Свой сайт19%
  2. Новые каналы продаж25%
  3. Выход на другой рынок30%
  4. Не меняю своей стратегии28%
  5. Не знаю что делать27%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,440 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Три дня с Expansio С 24 по 26 июля встречаемся офлайн в Нижнем Новгороде Без плотной программы “с утра до вечера” и бесконечных лекций С людьми, ради которых и создавалось сообщество 💋 Что нас ждёт: • прогулка по историческому центру города • вечер на воде с закатом • день на природе и активности • вечеринка • бизнес-завтрак Главная ценность этих встреч - не программа Мы собираемся, чтобы создать связи. Найти

5🔥4

15 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,000 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Автоматизация ради автоматизации С приходом ИИ стало казаться, что любую рутинную задачу нужно как можно быстрее отдать ИИ или собрать под нее отдельную связку Но автоматизация стоит не только денег на разработку Она стоит времени, внимания и поддержки процесса Иногда задача занимает 30 минут в неделю. Тогда дешевле делать ее руками несколько лет, чем тратить десятки часов на создание решения, которое не окупится

🔥54👍4

1 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC≈1,290 views20 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Бренд Olipop вырос с $9 млн до $400 млн, не изобретая новый продукт Он просто перестал продавать пользу и начал продавать эмоцию. Стал понятным потребителю В карточках разбираем механику, которую можно применить далеко за пределами категории напитков

6🔥6👍5👏2😱1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @expansioclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTCAnonymous Poll611 voters

Только селлеров: ваши мысли/планы теперь?

  1. Свой сайт19%
  2. Новые каналы продаж25%
  3. Выход на другой рынок30%
  4. Не меняю своей стратегии28%
  5. Не знаю что делать27%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артем Кей
@artemmkey · 31,390
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Сын Бакальчук
@sonbokalchuk · 37,612
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EXPANSIO инсайты” (@expansioclub), 6,693 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expansioclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.