Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАТАЛЬЯ БАРВИНСКАЯ | Продажи в Telegram и MAX

Channel

НАТАЛЬЯ БАРВИНСКАЯ | Продажи в Telegram и MAX

@expertpromotion

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,758subscribers

-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601933309
TypeChannel
Username@expertpromotion
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/expertpromotion

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,7589,8409,7997 August 2026 — 9,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,840 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,829 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,812 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,800 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,796 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,784 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,818 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,809 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,832 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,805 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,788 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,781 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,758 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,746–9,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 20:209,758-23
11 Sept 2026, 05:599,781-7
6 Sept 2026, 14:569,788-17
2 Sept 2026, 02:239,805-27
30 Aug 2026, 03:259,832+23
27 Aug 2026, 13:139,809-9
24 Aug 2026, 12:039,818+34
20 Aug 2026, 22:069,784-12
17 Aug 2026, 14:069,796-4
14 Aug 2026, 05:289,800-12
11 Aug 2026, 00:339,812-17
8 Aug 2026, 06:159,829-11
7 Aug 2026, 07:009,840no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:599,840first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.79%
avg views ÷ 9,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
467
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held44 (22 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total7,007
Reactions total455
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 32m
Average length
25m 20s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,285 reactions across 43 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44534.6%
🔥39630.8%
👍866.69%
💯856.61%
🥰594.59%
😁574.44%
🙏524.05%
🤣231.79%
❤‍🔥161.25%
👏161.25%
🕊141.09%
😍120.934%
🤔100.778%
🤩60.467%
🏆40.311%
😱30.233%
😢10.078%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 44 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @expertpromotion. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC279 views36 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Помните, я рассказывала вам про новый проект? Так вот, кажется, пора наконец рассказать, что я придумала))) Вчера проводила здесь опрос и, честно, удивилась результатам. Я думала, большинство сейчас возвращаются с отдыха и потихоньку включаются в работу. А оказалось, очень многие вообще не отдыхали и работали все лето. Мои дорогие, ну так нельзя. Отдых обязательно планируйте❤️ А я свой большой отпуск уже отгуляла,

15🔥10🥰5👏3🙏2😁1

25 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC446 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026

1 место на сентябрь в «РОСТ С НАТАЛЬЕЙ». В личное наставничество я готова взять одного сильного эксперта, который уже создал работающий проект и сейчас идет в свое развитие и масштаб. Когда вопрос уже не в том, как написать пост, где найти первого клиента или как начать продавать. А в другом. Куда расти дальше? - Как увеличить объем проекта, не превратив свою жизнь в бесконечную операционку? - На чем сейчас сфокуси

🔥1612👍5👏2

24 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC498 views116 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

17 лет! Как пролетели эти 17 лет? Как? В голове вообще сложно уложить. Кажется, одно мгновение - и из маленькой девочки выросла такая взрослая, красивая, умная девушка. И я смотрю на нее и иногда не верю: неужели уже 17? Наверное, дети лучше всего показывают нам, насколько быстро летит время. Хочется только одного - не пропустить его. Быть рядом. Разговаривать. Смеяться. Обниматься. И запоминать. С днем рождения,

59🥰25🔥23🕊4😍3👍2

23 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC499 views42 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Если вас пугает цена изменений - посчитайте, во сколько вам обходится стоять на месте.

💯1814🤩6🔥4

22 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC562 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

В понедельник стартует очередная проКАЧКА канала🚀 И я заметила интересную вещь. Кто-то приходит в проКАЧКУ регулярно: знакомится с новыми людьми, проявляется, получает обратную связь, находит коллег, партнеров, клиентов. А кто-то каждую неделю думает: В следующий раз. Сейчас некогда. Еще успею... Так вот - «следующих разов» в этом формате осталось совсем немного. В сентябре такой проКАЧКИ уже не будет. Я проведу ещ

4🔥3😱2

21 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC700 views17 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

«Как соцсети влияют на самооценку?» Запись панельной дискуссии #1 Тема, которая сегодня касается практически каждого, кто ведет соцсети. Каждый день мы видим чужие результаты, красивые картинки, большие охваты, успешные проекты. И вроде понимаем, что соцсети показывают только часть жизни человека… Но почему тогда иногда ловим себя на сравнении? Почему чужие успехи могут одновременно вдохновлять и заставлять сомнева

7🔥4🕊3👏2❤‍🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC433 views24 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥15❤‍🔥5🥰4

21 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC435 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Иметь наставника, у которого есть то, что ты хочешь и быть наставником для людей, которые не имеют того, что есть у тебя и они хотят это иметь Я забираю с собой то, что для роста доходов нужна система и Наставник! Проявляться. Я как раз копаю в сторону миссии, признания своих супер сил, с учётом отклика внутреннего, чтоб от работы глаза горели.. но никак не выйду с этим в мир. Выходу с намерением собрать перечень сво

🔥4❤‍🔥3💯21

21 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC375 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Делать для себя, то, что по кайфу. Делиться тем, чем делится с подругами в чатах

❤‍🔥2

21 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC391 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ИГРА!!! СБАВИТЬ ГРАДУС СЕРЬЕЗНОСТИ... Это точно, забей, сделать так, чтоб отписались)))))))))))))

🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC481 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

А что, если соцсети влияют на нашу самооценку сильнее, чем мы думаем? Уже в 11.30 Мск встречаемся на панельной дискуссии «Как соцсети влияют на самооценку?» Будем обсуждать: - почему мы сравниваем себя с другими, даже понимая, что видим только часть чужой жизни; - как на нас влияют охваты, подписчики и реакции; - почему чужие успехи иногда вдохновляют, а иногда заставляют обесценивать себя; - и что можно сделать, чт

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @expertpromotion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мария Богданова | Продвижение pinterest
@bogmasha_pinterest · 27,937
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
Остеопатия души
@osteopatiya_dushi · 45,696
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Подруга маркетолог (Маргарита Захарова)
@marketing_dir · 34,329
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Михаил Христосенко
@m_hristosenko · 25,457
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Время=Деньги | Институт TIME$
@times_institute · 67,905
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАТАЛЬЯ БАРВИНСКАЯ | Продажи в Telegram и MAX” (@expertpromotion), 9,758 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expertpromotion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.