Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ежов

Channel

Ежов

@ezhovs2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,053subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001037715157
TypeChannel
Username@ezhovs2
Created19 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ezhovs2

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,0536,2546,153.55 August 2026 — 6,203 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,203 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,207 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,199 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,204 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,211 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,213 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,193 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,210 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,241 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,253 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,254 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,245 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,236 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,235 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,198 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,185 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,177 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,176 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,174 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,162 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,146 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,129 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,110 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,083 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,053 subscribers5 August 20265 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,023–6,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 23:266,053-30
2 Nov 2026, 13:256,083-27
30 Oct 2026, 15:496,110-19
27 Oct 2026, 22:366,129-17
25 Oct 2026, 07:416,146-16
22 Oct 2026, 17:316,162-12
19 Oct 2026, 19:006,174-2
16 Oct 2026, 16:466,176-1
13 Oct 2026, 10:066,177-8
6 Oct 2026, 21:156,185-13
29 Sept 2026, 17:006,198-37
15 Sept 2026, 14:026,235-1
12 Sept 2026, 03:166,236-9
7 Sept 2026, 18:206,245-9
2 Sept 2026, 22:086,254+1
31 Aug 2026, 01:566,253+12
28 Aug 2026, 04:326,241+31
24 Aug 2026, 22:046,210+17
21 Aug 2026, 12:356,193-20
18 Aug 2026, 11:426,213first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.3%
avg views ÷ 6,053 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held37 (18 June 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total17,920
Reactions total884
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 50s
Average length
2m 10s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,098 reactions across 34 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,38033.7%
🤬66816.3%
❤58414.3%
🔥51312.5%
💯2315.64%
😁1092.66%
🍾1062.59%
👏882.15%
🕊641.56%
🤷‍♂571.39%
😡511.24%
🤡400.976%
⚡330.805%
🤣260.634%
🤝250.61%
🗿130.317%
🤪130.317%
💩90.22%
👌80.195%
😢70.171%
22 further kinds731.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,538 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
94
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 37 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ezhovs2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (57.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

23 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,570 views176 reactions16 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

А я обязываю суд посадить Олега Дерипаску. Если хотите финансово поддержать выход новых расследований, в том числе про путинских олигархов, для которых они очень болезненны, то вот мой Патреон: https://www.patreon.com/ezhovs Подписывайтесь и помогайте. Дерипаска ведь честную журналистику не проспонсирует. Как и его двоюродный брат Павел Езубов, подписанный на этот телеграм-канал (да, я вижу, что он давно за мной ту…

❤107💯36🤣15🤪6👍4👏3⚡2🕊1

21 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,020 views143 reactions3 Starsread 5 November 2026

Смотрю интервью Дудя с Евой Морозовой. И очень с ней согласен, когда она говорит, что сам Путин ей не интересен, а интересна система, в том числе парламентская. Как сделать так, чтобы условный Путин не мог сломать её и погубить целую страну. Вот «Единая Россия» на последних «выборах» без учёта фальсификаций набрала всего около 15% голосов россиян. От общего числа, а не от явки. Даже если брать официальные результат…

❤71🔥26💯25🤝8👌3👍3🤡3😢2

20 Oct 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,140 views51 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @BILD_RussianPhoto

🚩 Обзор от BILD | Трамп против Зеленского. Виды на мир Смотрите через несколько минут, в 16:05 по Москве (15:05 по Берлину) в прямом эфире. Вице-президент Фонда Карнеги Эндрю Вайс, журналист-расследователь Сергей Ежов, руководитель экспертно-аналитического проекта Re:Russia Кирилл Рогов — гости нового Обзора от BILD. 🔗 https://youtu.be/9WGiEo8rHCk @BILD_Russian

🔥33👍11👏2🤡2⚡1💯1🤝1

19 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC≈2,110 views51 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Дмитрий Григоренко последние годы занимал одну из самых высоких позиций в госсистеме. И вот сегодня стало известно, что он уходит с поста вице-премьера. Совсем недавно про Григоренко, который был правой рукой Мишустина, мы выпускали расследование: https://t.me/ezhovs2/1044

👍37🔥8👏4⚡1🗿1

13 Oct 2026, 09:36 UTC≈3,300 views192 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

В The Insider я больше не работаю. Но осталась ещё пара расследований, которые готовил до своего ухода. Сегодня как раз такое опубликовано: https://theins.ru/inv/293471 Выявил, что каждый десятый действующий депутат Европарламента посещал Россию после захвата Крыма и начала санкционной политики. Таких набралось больше 60 европарламентариев! Не менее двух десятков из них при этом можно назвать откровенно прокремлёвск…

👍133❤23👏13🔥8😡7🕊6🤝2

9 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC≈3,560 views94 reactions12 Starsread 5 November 2026

Говорил тут, что деньги от патреона использую в том числе для соло-расследований. Сейчас как раз такой случай. Деньги мне нужны. Поддержать мою работу, оформив подписку, можно здесь: https://www.patreon.com/cw/ezhovs

👍47❤29🕊8🙏3🤝2🤡2⚡1👌1

9 Oct 2026, 10:48 UTC≈3,220 views177 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Новость из Евросоюза, которая меня возмутила. В очередной раз Эстония добилась исключения из санкционного пакета российской компании, которая поставляет редкоземельные металлы эстонской Silmet. Я посмотрел таможенные данные: поставщиком является «Соликамский магниевый завод». Но экспортирует он продукцию не только в Эстонию, но и в Нидерланды, Францию, Литву и Польшу. За время войны выручил десятки миллионов доллар…

🤬118💯41🤣6🕊5❤2🔥1🗿1🤓1

5 Oct 2026, 15:52 UTC≈3,220 views158 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Ну вот и арестовали Андрея Дорошенко, который был уличён мною нарушении антикоррупционных норм. Он фиктивно развёлся с женой и записал на неё квартиру за 100 млн. А на дочь и сына — фирму, осваивающую господряды. Дорошенко был депутатом Госдумы от «Единой России», но в новый созыв не попал. Лишился мандата и отправился в СИЗО.

🍾106👍39⚡5🕊4💯1🔥1🤝1😁1

2 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,540 views77 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @sapereonlineFile

Как в результате антикоррупционных расследований появляются санкции? Почему расследований все больше? Как поддержать независимых журналистов? Об этом новый эпизод подкаста Сапере Ауде — с журналистом-расследователем, выпускником Школы гражданского просвещения Сергеем Ежовым. 📌 Слушайте подкаст на всех платформах, на Youtube-канале Sapere Aude или здесь.

👍56❤9🔥3🥰3✍2🕊2💯1🤝1

26 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC≈3,710 views62 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

В 13 часов по мск буду в эфире здесь https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0J_SkVyTok

👍42❤13🥰2⚡1🏆1👌1🕊1🤡1

23 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈3,360 views168 reactions3 Starsread 5 November 2026

Ещё одно позорище. Суд ЕС решил, что если бывший парламентарий, голосовавший за все людоедские решения, "отошёл от политической жизни", то санкции в отношении него продлевать не стоит. А с сотрудников ФСИН, которые пытали политзаключённых, но вышли на пенсию, тоже надо санкции снимать? Чем это отличается? Это ещё больше развязывает руки всем этим сенаторам и депутатам. Ну и что, если мы сегодня попали под санкции. …

🤬134💯18🤪7👍3🤡2👌1👏1🤷‍♀1

23 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,560 views102 reactions3 Starsread 5 November 2026

Почему не появилось механизма нормального выхода из-под санкций Утром побывал сразу в трёх эфирах: «Разворот», «Дождь» и The Breakfast Show. Комментировал снятие санкций с Алишера Усманова и Михаила Фридмана. Это позорище, конечно. И символическая точка в проигранной Европой санкционной войне. Но возник вопрос. А почему Евросоюз не придумал «нормального» механизма выхода из-под санкций? В обмен на конкретные шаги, …

💯73👍12🕊8❤2🗿2🤔2🤷‍♀2🤷‍♂1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @ezhovs2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTCFinal Results551 voters

Если вы живёте в Европе, то вышли бы на акцию с требованием санкций для Усманова и др. олигархов?

  1. Да26%
  2. Нет6%
  3. Живу не в Европе/Посмотреть результаты62%
  4. Зависит от организаторов7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTCFinal Results531 voters

Что делать на выборах в Госдуму? Ваше мнение

  1. Голосовать за «Яблоко»68%
  2. Голосовать за КПРФ или другую парламентскую партию (но не ЕР)10%
  3. Вообще не голосовать — это всё бессмысленно и того не стоит21%
  4. Я за власть, тут по работе2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПЕВЧИХ
@mariapevchikh · 22,553
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Leonid Volkov
@leonid_volkov · 21,896
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Милов. Команда
@team_milov · 31,223
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
Жданов
@ioannZH · 20,406
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ежов” (@ezhovs2), 6,053 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ezhovs2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.